Document Detail

Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16326784     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic sensitivity is calculated as the number of correct diagnoses divided by the sum of correct diagnoses plus the number of missed or false negative diagnoses. Because missed diagnoses are generally detected during clinical follow up or at necropsy, the low necropsy rates seen in current practice may result in overestimates of diagnostic performance. Using three target conditions (aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and active tuberculosis), the prevalence of clinically missed cases among necropsied and non-necropsied deaths was estimated and the impact of low necropsy rates on the apparent sensitivity of antemortem diagnosis determined. METHODS: After reviewing case series for each target condition, the most recent study that included cases first detected at necropsy was selected and the reported sensitivity of clinical diagnosis adjusted by estimating the total number of cases that would have been detected had all decedents undergone necropsy. These estimates were based on available data for necropsy rates, time period, country (US v non-US), and case mix. RESULTS: For all three target diagnoses, adjusting for the estimated prevalence of clinically missed cases among non-necropsied deaths produced sensitivity values outside the 95% confidence interval for the originally reported values, and well below sensitivities reported for the diagnostic tests that are usually used to detect these conditions. For active tuberculosis the sensitivity of antemortem diagnosis decreased from an apparent value of 96% to a corrected value of 83%, with a plausible range of 42-91%; for aortic dissection the sensitivity decreased from 86% to 74%; and for pulmonary embolism the reduction fell only modestly from 97% to 91% but was still lower than generally reported values of 98% or more. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to adjust for the prevalence of missed cases among non-necropsied deaths may substantially overstate the performance of diagnostic tests and antemortem diagnosis in general, especially for conditions with high early case fatality.
K G Shojania; E C Burton; K M McDonald; L Goldman
Related Documents :
8432514 - Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: a review of 1,000 cases.
10641944 - Suicide by electrocution with low-voltage current.
8849614 - Transesophageal echocardiographic features and management of retained intracardiac air ...
1882774 - The moving, projected, annual total. a kinetic prognostic entity.
8537994 - Ethmoidal myofibroblastoma.
22652424 - Acute psychosis during the postictal period in a patient with idiopathic generalized ep...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Quality & safety in health care     Volume:  14     ISSN:  1475-3901     ISO Abbreviation:  Qual Saf Health Care     Publication Date:  2005 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-12-05     Completed Date:  2006-03-10     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101136980     Medline TA:  Qual Saf Health Care     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  408-13     Citation Subset:  H    
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aneurysm, Dissecting / diagnosis*,  mortality
Aortic Aneurysm / diagnosis*,  mortality
Confidence Intervals
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Diagnostic Errors*
Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*,  mortality
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tuberculosis / diagnosis*,  mortality
United States
Grant Support
290-970013//PHS HHS
Comment In:
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):144   [PMID:  16585118 ]
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):397   [PMID:  16326780 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident anal...
Next Document:  What is the patient really taking? Discrepancies between surgery and anesthesiology preoperative med...