| Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22473436 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BACKGROUND: Precise quantification of overdiagnosis of breast cancer (defined as the percentage of cases of cancer that would not have become clinically apparent in a woman's lifetime without screening) due to mammography screening has been hampered by lack of valid comparison groups that identify incidence trends attributable to screening versus those due to temporal trends in incidence. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the percentage of overdiagnosis of breast cancer attributable to mammography screening. DESIGN: Comparison of invasive breast cancer incidence with and without screening. SETTING: A nationwide mammography screening program in Norway (inviting women aged 50 to 69 years), gradually implemented from 1996 to 2005. PARTICIPANTS: The Norwegian female population. MEASUREMENTS: Concomitant incidence of invasive breast cancer from 1996 to 2005 in counties where the screening program was implemented compared with that in counties where the program was not yet implemented. To adjust for changes in temporal trends in breast cancer incidence, incidence rates during the preceding decade were also examined. The percentage of overdiagnosis was calculated by accounting for the expected decrease in incidence following cessation of screening after age 69 years (approach 1) and by comparing incidence in the current screening group with incidence among women 2 and 5 years older in the historical screening groups, accounting for average lead time (approach 2). RESULTS: A total of 39,888 patients with invasive breast cancer were included, 7793 of whom were diagnosed after the screening program started. The estimated rate of overdiagnosis attributable to the program was 18% to 25% (P < 0.001) for approach 1 and 15% to 20% (P < 0.001) for approach 2. Thus, 15% to 25% of cases of cancer are overdiagnosed, translating to 6 to 10 women overdiagnosed for every 2500 women invited. LIMITATION: The study was registry-based. CONCLUSION: Mammography screening entails a substantial amount of overdiagnosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Norwegian Research Council and Frontier Science. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Mette Kalager; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer; Rulla M Tamimi |
Related Documents
:
|
9538356 - Deaths and tumours among workers grinding stainless steel: a follow up. 8347096 - Lung functions and chest radiographs in shipyard workers exposed to asbestos. 16808626 - Mortality among radiation workers at rocketdyne (atomics international), 1948-1999. 23616046 - Overexpression of clusterin promotes angiogenesis via the vascular endothelial growth f... 21675836 - Anticancer effects of metformin and its potential use as a therapeutic agent for breast... 12395746 - Geographic & age variations in invasive cervical cancer in kentucky, 1995-1999. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Annals of internal medicine Volume: 156 ISSN: 1539-3704 ISO Abbreviation: Ann. Intern. Med. Publication Date: 2012 Apr |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2012-04-04 Completed Date: 2012-05-21 Revised Date: 2013-05-13 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0372351 Medline TA: Ann Intern Med Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 491-9 Citation Subset: AIM; IM |
Affiliation:
|
Harvard School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. mkalager@hsph.harvard.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Aged Breast Neoplasms / epidemiology, radiography* Early Detection of Cancer Female Humans Incidence Mammography / standards* Mass Screening / methods, standards* Middle Aged Norway / epidemiology Registries Time Factors |
| Comments/Corrections | |
Comment In:
|
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):536-7
[PMID:
22473439
]
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):219; author reply 221-2 [PMID: 22868848 ] Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):220; author reply 221-2 [PMID: 22868850 ] Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):219-20; author reply 221-2 [PMID: 22868849 ] Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):220-1; author reply 221-2 [PMID: 22868851 ] Am Fam Physician. 2013 Mar 15;87(6):408-9 [PMID: 23547573 ] Evid Based Med. 2013 Apr;18(2):e17 [PMID: 22923706 ] |
Summary for patients in:
|
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):I58
[PMID:
22473444
]
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Effect of an iPod video intervention on consent to donate organs: a randomized trial.
Next Document: Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines.