Document Detail


Outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament treatment: a review of the evidence.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21079509     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the current recommendations in an evidence-based manner with regard to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of multiple databases, evaluating studies on the outcomes of PCL treatment in isolation and in the multiligamentous injured knee.
RESULTS: Twenty-one studies of isolated PCL reconstructions and 10 studies of combined PCL reconstruction were identified for inclusion. Eight studies reported graft failure as an outcome, with an overall rate of 11.6%. Three studies reported outcomes of single bundle PCL reconstruction using hamstring autograft; there were 12 graft failures in 96 reconstructions (12.5%). There were 2 graft failures in a total of 17 combined PCL/anterior cruciate ligament/posterolateral corner reconstructions (11.8%). In the combined PCL studies, return to preinjury activity level ranged from 19 to 68%. In the isolated PCL studies, 50 to 82% of patients were able to return to preinjury activity level. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes (Lysholm and IKDC). From 37% to 70% of patients in the combined PCL studies had a normal posterior drawer test at final follow-up. One study showed a significant difference in the mean posterior drawer test side-to-side difference between the 7-strand and 4-strand hamstring autograft groups (1.7 vs. 3.7 mm, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, firm recommendations on what treatment or technique to choose cannot be given based upon the available literature. There is a need for higher-quality clinical studies to guide treatment decisions. Generally good results are reported after PCL reconstruction, but the long-term studies available suggest that normal stability in the majority of patients is not restored.
Authors:
Sommer Hammoud; Keith R Reinhardt; Robert G Marx
Related Documents :
19171269 - A minimum 2-year follow-up after selective anteromedial or posterolateral bundle anteri...
17202919 - Single-and double-incision double-bundle acl reconstruction.
16493169 - All-inside meniscal repair using a new flexible, tensionable device.
11252459 - Is a knee brace advantageous after anterior cruciate ligament surgery? a prospective, r...
17578979 - The effect of initiating a preventive multimodal analgesic regimen on long-term patient...
9048389 - A prospective, clinical study evaluating arthroscopic acl reconstruction using the semi...
6849849 - Lamicel: a new technique for cervical dilatation before first trimester abortion.
17522469 - Role of mesohepatectomy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for la...
15278539 - Epidural administration and analgesic spread: comparison of injection with catheters an...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Sports medicine and arthroscopy review     Volume:  18     ISSN:  1538-1951     ISO Abbreviation:  Sports Med Arthrosc     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-16     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9315689     Medline TA:  Sports Med Arthrosc     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  280-91     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Postoperative rehabilitation of the posterior cruciate ligament.
Next Document:  A Randomized, Open-Label Pilot Study Comparing Desirudin and Argatroban in Patients With Suspected H...