Document Detail

Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17931389     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
AIMS: The aims of this study were (i) to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on the outcome of primary (initial or first time) root canal treatment; (ii) to investigate the influence of some study characteristics on the estimated pooled success rates.
METHODOLOGY: Longitudinal clinical studies investigating outcome of primary root canal treatment, published up to the end of 2002, were identified electronically (MEDLINE and Cochrane database 1966-2002 December, week 4). Four journals (International Endodontic Journal, Journal of Endodontics, Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Endodontics Radiology and Dental Traumatology & Endodontics), bibliographies of all relevant papers and review articles were hand-searched. Three reviewers (Y-LN, SR and KG) independently assessed, selected the studies based on specified inclusion criteria, and extracted the data onto a pre-designed proforma. The study inclusion criteria were: longitudinal clinical studies investigating root canal treatment outcome; only primary root canal treatment carried out on the teeth studied; sample size given; at least 6-month postoperative review; success based on clinical and/or radiographic criteria (strict, absence of apical radiolucency; loose, reduction in size of radiolucency); overall success rate given or could be calculated from the raw data. The findings by individual study were summarized and the pooled success rates by each potential influencing factor were calculated for this part of the study.
RESULTS: Of the 119 articles identified, 63 studies published from 1922 to 2002, fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for the review: six were randomized trials, seven were cohort studies and 48 were retrospective studies. The reported mean success rates ranged from 31% to 96% based on strict criteria or from 60% to 100% based on loose criteria, with substantial heterogeneity in the estimates of pooled success rates. Apart from the radiographic criteria of success, none of the other study characteristics could explain this heterogeneity. Twenty-four factors (patient and operative) had been investigated in various combinations in the studies reviewed. The influence of preoperative pulpal and periapical status of the teeth on treatment outcome were most frequently explored, but the influence of treatment technique was poorly investigated.
CONCLUSIONS: The estimated weighted pooled success rates of treatments completed at least 1 year prior to review, ranged between 68% and 85% when strict criteria were used. The reported success rates had not improved over the last four (or five) decades. The quality of evidence for treatment factors affecting primary root canal treatment outcome is sub-optimal; there was substantial variation in the study-designs. It would be desirable to standardize aspects of study-design, data recording and presentation format of outcome data in the much needed future outcome studies.
Y-L Ng; V Mann; S Rahbaran; J Lewsey; K Gulabivala
Related Documents :
11483459 - Preventive care in the emergency department: should emergency departments institute a f...
16959759 - A commentary on clinical trials in chronic heart failure.
19821289 - Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring.
15846699 - Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nsaids) versus opioids for acute renal colic.
16503369 - Treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: methodological issues, operational ...
16549699 - Nasogastric intubation after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of recent literature.
10225069 - Focus on mobilisation after lower abdominal surgery. a double-blind randomised comparis...
24083829 - Impact of stone branch number on outcomes of prcutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment ...
21830369 - Utility of placement of pancreatic duct spontaneous dislodgement stent for prevention o...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review     Date:  2007-10-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  International endodontic journal     Volume:  40     ISSN:  0143-2885     ISO Abbreviation:  Int Endod J     Publication Date:  2007 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-11-12     Completed Date:  2008-01-07     Revised Date:  2011-11-09    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8004996     Medline TA:  Int Endod J     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  921-39     Citation Subset:  D    
Unit of Endodontology, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Research Design
Root Canal Therapy*
Treatment Outcome
Comment In:
Int Endod J. 2011 Nov;44(11):1079-80   [PMID:  21972838 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature -- Part 2. Influence of...
Next Document:  Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro.