Document Detail


Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9843287     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a recently developed hardware and software system for CT scanning that generates images in real time and switches to helical CT scanning by either a visual cue or a region of interest (ROI) amplitude threshold. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We randomly and prospectively divided 120 abdominal CT examinations into three groups. Two groups received 75 ml of contrast agent at 1.5 ml/sec. Helical CT scanning began after visualization of the contrast bolus arrival in the hepatic veins (visual cue triggering) (39 patients) or after reaching an ROI threshold (automated ROI threshold triggering) (39 patients). A third group served as a control group (42 patients) and received 150 ml of contrast agent at 1 ml/sec. Quality of hepatic enhancement was assessed objectively and subjectively. Comparisons were made after stratifying each group into three weight classes. RESULTS: Errors occurred in 12 (31%) of 39 examinations in the group with automated ROI threshold triggering. In that group, we found a significantly (p < .04) lower mean hepatic enhancement in two of three weight categories, and a significantly (p < .04) lower mean subjective scan quality in one of three weight categories, than we found in the group with visual cue triggering. CONCLUSION: Optimizing portal venous phase helical CT of the liver after a low-volume bolus of contrast agent and an injection rate of 1.5 ml/sec is best achieved by initiating helical CT scanning after visualizing the contrast bolus arrival within the liver rather than after reaching a preset attenuation threshold.
Authors:
G D Schweiger; P J Chang; B P Brown
Related Documents :
9163827 - Helical ct for detection and characterization of renal masses.
9135647 - New barium paste mixture for helical (slip-ring) ct evaluation of rectal carcinoma.
15075837 - Advanced imaging in stone management.
22190657 - Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from mr imaging data: comparison with radio...
21540217 - Cardiac silhouette findings and mediastinal lines and stripes: radiograph and ct scan c...
20117627 - Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in anterior cruciate ligament grafts ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  171     ISSN:  0361-803X     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  1998 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-12-16     Completed Date:  1998-12-16     Revised Date:  2008-02-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1551-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Contrast Media / administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Iohexol / diagnostic use
Iothalamate Meglumine / diagnostic use
Liver / radiography*
Liver Neoplasms / radiography
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Contrast Media; 13087-53-1/Iothalamate Meglumine; 66108-95-0/Iohexol

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparing single-shot RARE and multislic...
Next Document:  Hepatic and portal surface veins: a new anatomic variant revealed during abdominal CT.