Document Detail

Optimizing GnRH antagonist administration: meta-analysis of fixed versus flexible protocol.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15949209     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether flexible gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration according to follicular size would be more beneficial than starting on a fixed day. Only randomized controlled trials were included after a comprehensive search strategy. The data were combined for meta-analysis with RevMan software. Eleven trials were identified, but only four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate per woman randomized, although there was a trend towards a higher pregnancy rate with the fixed protocol, especially with delayed administration beyond day 8 [odds ratio (OR) 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-1.1]. There was no premature LH surge in any participant in either protocol. However, there was a statistically significant reduction both in number of antagonist ampoules (OR -1.2 95%, CI -1.26 to -1.15) and amount of gonadotrophin (OR 95.5 IU, 95% CI 74.8-116.1) used in the flexible protocol. In conclusion, there was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate between flexible and fixed protocols. There was a statistically significant reduction in the amount of recombinant FSH with the flexible protocol.
Hesham Al-Inany; Mohamed A Aboulghar; Ragaa T Mansour; Gamal I Serour
Related Documents :
16269069 - The impact of maternal stress on pregnancy outcome in a well-educated caucasian populat...
19707899 - The effect of second-line surgery on reproductive performance of women with recurrent e...
17434499 - First trimester bacterial vaginosis, individual microorganism levels, and risk of secon...
16629699 - The association of the pon1 q192r polymorphism with complications and outcomes of pregn...
25075279 - Case report: pregnancy in a patient with recurrent glioblastoma.
7056199 - Fetal loss, gravidity and pregnancy order: is the truncated cascade analysis valid?
9058339 - Gamete intrafallopian transfer. does smoking play a role?
3535359 - Does position and size of corpus luteum have any effect on nausea of pregnancy?
6849219 - Congenital intestinal aganglionosis in white foals.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Reproductive biomedicine online     Volume:  10     ISSN:  1472-6483     ISO Abbreviation:  Reprod. Biomed. Online     Publication Date:  2005 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-06-13     Completed Date:  2005-08-05     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101122473     Medline TA:  Reprod Biomed Online     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  567-70     Citation Subset:  IM    
The Egyptian IVF-ET Centre, Maadi, Cairo, Egypt.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone / administration & dosage*,  antagonists & inhibitors*
Luteinizing Hormone / blood
Ovarian Follicle / drug effects
Pregnancy Rate
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reg. No./Substance:
33515-09-2/Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; 9002-67-9/Luteinizing Hormone

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Osteomyelitis of the ischium: unusual presentation.
Next Document:  Is the occurrence of the empty follicle syndrome a predictor that a subsequent stimulated cycle will...