Document Detail


Optimized versus corrected peak power during friction-braked cycle ergometry in males and females.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17474039     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The aim of this study was to compare optimization and correction procedures for the determination of peak power output during friction-loaded cycle ergometry. Ten male and 10 female sports students each performed five 10-s sprints from a stationary start on a Monark 864 basket-loaded ergometer. Resistive loads of 5.0, 6.5, 8.0, 9.5, and 11.0% body weight were administered in a counterbalanced order, with a recovery period of 10 min between sprints. Peak power was greater and occurred earlier, with less work having been done before the attainment of peak power, when the data were corrected to account for the inertial and frictional characteristics of the ergometer. Corrected peak power was independent of resistive load (P > 0.05), whereas uncorrected peak power varied as a quadratic function of load (P < 0.001). For males and females, optimized peak power (971 +/- 122 and 668 +/- 37 W) was lower (P < 0.01) than either the highest (1074 +/- 111 and 754 +/- 56 W respectively) or the mean (1007 +/- 125 and 701 +/- 45 W respectively) of the five values for corrected peak power. Optimized and mean corrected peak power were highly correlated both in males (r = 0.97, P < 0.001) and females (r = 0.96, P < 0.001). The difference between optimized and mean corrected peak power was 37 +/- 30 W in males and 33 +/- 14 W in females, of which approximately 15 W was due to the correction for frictional losses. We conclude that corrected peak power is independent of resistive load in males and females.
Authors:
David V B James; Dan M Wood; Tom C B Maberly; Mark De Ste Croix
Related Documents :
2963939 - Manual wheelchair propulsion: effects of power output on physiology and technique.
24079429 - Microinstability and internal impingement in overhead athletes.
17565769 - Are there differences in performance, metabolism, and quadriceps muscle activity in bla...
8492689 - Exercise ventilatory response to upright and aero-posture cycling.
7768239 - Maximal power and torque-velocity relationship on a cycle ergometer during the accelera...
1803059 - Cardiorespiratory responses to cyclic triangular ramp forcings in work load.
2311599 - Muscle hypertrophy and fast fiber type conversions in heavy resistance-trained women.
17701169 - Chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the lower extremities: improved screening us...
15289799 - Optimal exercise intensities for fat metabolism in handbike cycling and cycling.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of sports sciences     Volume:  25     ISSN:  0264-0414     ISO Abbreviation:  J Sports Sci     Publication Date:  2007 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-05-02     Completed Date:  2007-07-11     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8405364     Medline TA:  J Sports Sci     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  859-67     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sport, Health and Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK. djames@glos.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Bicycling / physiology*
Ergometry*
Exercise Test
Female
Great Britain
Humans
Male
Physical Exertion / physiology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Relationship between maximal oxygen uptake and oxygen uptake attained during treadmill middle-distan...
Next Document:  Modelling age and secular differences in fitness between basketball players.