| Optimal magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21392151 Owner: NLM Status: In-Process |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Quality magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is complex and requires optimization of many technical factors. The most important factors are: magnet field and gradient strengths, coil selection, receiver bandwidth, field of view and image matrix size, number of excitations, slice thickness, image weighting and contrast, imaging planes and the direction of the phase, and frequency gradients. The ability to augment a standard MR study with additional sequences, and the need to ensure the completed study is comprehensive and robust must be balanced against the time the patient spends under anesthesia in the magnet. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Ian Robertson |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association Volume: 52 ISSN: 1058-8183 ISO Abbreviation: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Publication Date: 2011 Mar-Apr |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-03-11 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9209635 Medline TA: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: S15-22 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
© 2011 Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA. ian_robertson@ncsu.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Health status of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A parent's perspective.
Next Document: Growth of Clinical Veterinary Magnetic resonance imaging.