Document Detail


Opposing systematic reviews: the effects of two quality rating instruments on evidence regarding t'ai chi and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21548814     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: This article compares and contrasts two systematic reviews of t'ai chi (TC) interventions on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. The aim is to examine how chosen quality rating instruments can impact systematic reviews of TC literature.
METHODS: The rating instruments in the reviews, the three-item scale of Jadad et al. and the ad hoc checklist of Wayne et al., were analyzed using Oxman's evaluation criteria for systematic reviews regarding inclusion of articles, interpretation of results, and overall implications for the efficacy of TC on bone mineral density.
RESULTS: According to Oxman's criteria, the Jadad scale did not address advances in statistical methods and was not comprehensive enough to adapt to the clinical context or topic. In contrast, the checklist by Wayne et al. was comprehensive, adaptable to clinical context and topical relevance, and compatible with recent developments in statistics and experimental design. These quality rating instruments were critical in the inclusion of studies, analyses, and overall conclusions summarizing the TC literature. The conclusions from the two systematic reviews were starkly opposing; Lee et al. found no convincing evidence, dismissing TC studies as low quality, while Wayne et al. stated that TC may be an effective, safe, and practical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Readers must exercise caution concerning high or low ratings from systematic reviews of TC studies because the choice of quality rating tool can dramatically influence the summary and conclusions of the reviews. There is no consensus on quality rating standards at this time. Of the two, the Jadad scale was not only inadequate but also inappropriate for reviewing TC studies, potentially misleading researchers, clinicians and policymakers. Future systematic reviews of TC should utilize instruments that are updated to current scientific standards, comprehensive, adaptable to clinical context, and relevant to the research topic.
Authors:
Sunny Y Alperson; Vance W Berger
Related Documents :
23442494 - Drug-induced lupus associated with rifabutin and literature review.
21393414 - Comparison of 2008 national and state-level self-reported and observed seatbelt use est...
7021864 - Eosinophilic gastroenteritis with rectal involvement: case report and a review of liter...
21410594 - Do rates of arthritis and chorea predict the incidence of acute rheumatic fever?
9864874 - Testicular torsion after previous orchidopexy for undescended testis.
15622594 - Sclerosing mesenteritis with occult ileal perforation: report of a case simulating exte...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2011-05-06
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)     Volume:  17     ISSN:  1557-7708     ISO Abbreviation:  J Altern Complement Med     Publication Date:  2011 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-05-20     Completed Date:  2011-11-28     Revised Date:  2013-06-30    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9508124     Medline TA:  J Altern Complement Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  389-95     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nursing Research , and NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. alpersonsy@mail.nih.gov
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Biomedical Research / standards*
Bone Density*
Checklist
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal / prevention & control*
Research Design / standards*
Review Literature as Topic*
Tai Ji*
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The effect of comorbidity burden on health care utilization for patients with cancer using hospice.
Next Document:  Variability of angular measurements of head posture within a session, within a day, and over a 7-day...