Document Detail

Operator-induced errors in Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensing: model eye study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17189805     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of instrument realignment and angular misalignment during the clinical determination of wavefront aberrations by simulation in model eyes. SETTING: Aston Academy of Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom. METHODS: Six model eyes were examined with wavefront-aberration-supported cornea ablation (WASCA) (Carl Zeiss Meditec) in 4 sessions of 10 measurements each: sessions 1 and 2, consecutive repeated measures without realignment; session 3, realignment of the instrument between readings; session 4, measurements without realignment but with the model eye shifted 6 degrees angularly. Intersession repeatability and the effects of realignment and misalignment were obtained by comparing the measurements in the various sessions for coma, spherical aberration, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). RESULTS: The mean differences between the 2 sessions without realignment of the instrument were 0.020 microm +/- 0.076 (SD) for Z(3)(-1)(P = .551), 0.009 +/- 0.139 microm for Z(3)(1)(P = .877), 0.004 +/- 0.037 microm for Z(4)(0) (P = .820), and 0.005 +/- 0.01 microm for HO root mean square (RMS) (P = .301). Differences between the nonrealigned and realigned instruments were -0.017 +/- 0.026 microm for Z(3)(-1)(P = .159), 0.009 +/- 0.028 microm for Z(3)(1) (P = .475), 0.007 +/- 0.014 microm for Z(4)(0)(P = .296), and 0.002 +/- 0.007 microm for HO RMS (P = 0.529; differences between centered and misaligned instruments were -0.355 +/- 0.149 microm for Z(3)(-1) (P = .002), 0.007 +/- 0.034 microm for Z(3)(1)(P = .620), -0.005 +/- 0.081 microm for Z(4)(0)(P = .885), and 0.012 +/- 0.020 microm for HO RMS (P = .195). Realignment increased the standard deviation by a factor of 3 compared with the first session without realignment. CONCLUSIONS: Repeatability of the WASCA was excellent in all situations tested. Realignment substantially increased the variance of the measurements. Angular misalignment can result in significant errors, particularly in the determination of coma. These findings are important when assessing highly aberrated eyes during follow-up or before surgery.
Alejandro Cervino; Sarah L Hosking; Mark C M Dunne
Related Documents :
20227675 - Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond l...
25485145 - Evaluation of corneal stromal demarcation line after two different protocols of acceler...
25237185 - Morning pentraxin3 levels reflect obstructive sleep apnea-related acute inflammation.
4074885 - The routine differential leukocyte count vs automated differential counts.
8807655 - Ocular hazards of industrial spot welding.
20706655 - Sleep health issues for children with fasd: clinical considerations.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cataract and refractive surgery     Volume:  33     ISSN:  0886-3350     ISO Abbreviation:  J Cataract Refract Surg     Publication Date:  2007 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-12-26     Completed Date:  2007-03-12     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8604171     Medline TA:  J Cataract Refract Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  115-21     Citation Subset:  IM    
School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Diagnostic Errors*
Models, Biological*
Observer Variation
Refractive Errors / diagnosis*
Reproducibility of Results
Vision Screening / instrumentation*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Factors influencing refractive outcomes after combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy...
Next Document:  Effect of ophthalmic solution components on acrylic intraocular lenses.