Document Detail


Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: a conceptual model.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21916943     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: This study was intended to develop a conceptual framework of the factors impacting on faculty members' judgements and ratings of resident doctors (residents) after direct observation with patients.
METHODS: In 2009, 44 general internal medicine faculty members responsible for out-patient resident teaching in 16 internal medicine residency programmes in a large urban area in the eastern USA watched four videotaped scenarios and two live scenarios of standardised residents engaged in clinical encounters with standardised patients. After each, faculty members rated the resident using a mini-clinical evaluation exercise and were individually interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Interviews were videotaped, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory methods.
RESULTS: Four primary themes that provide insights into the variability of faculty assessments of residents' performance were identified: (i) the frames of reference used by faculty members when translating observations into judgements and ratings are variable; (ii) high levels of inference are used during the direct observation process; (iii) the methods by which judgements are synthesised into numerical ratings are variable, and (iv) factors external to resident performance influence ratings. From these themes, a conceptual model was developed to describe the process of observation, interpretation, synthesis and rating.
CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that multiple factors account for the variability in faculty ratings of residents. Understanding these factors informs potential new approaches to faculty development to improve the accuracy, reliability and utility of clinical skills assessment.
Authors:
Jennifer R Kogan; Lisa Conforti; Elizabeth Bernabeo; William Iobst; Eric Holmboe
Related Documents :
21338843 - Contemporary options for longitudinal follow-up: lessons learned from a cohort of urban...
21198253 - Learning and retention through predictive inference and classification.
22416503 - Qualitative evaluation of the secondary 3 training program of the project p.a.t.h.s. in...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medical education     Volume:  45     ISSN:  1365-2923     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Educ     Publication Date:  2011 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-09-15     Completed Date:  2012-01-04     Revised Date:  2012-02-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7605655     Medline TA:  Med Educ     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1048-60     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011.
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. jennifer.kogan@uphs.upenn.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Clinical Competence / standards*
Education, Medical, Graduate / methods*,  standards
Educational Measurement / methods*,  standards
Female
Humans
Internship and Residency
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Observation
Physician-Patient Relations*
Questionnaires
Videotape Recording
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):970-2   [PMID:  21916937 ]
Med Educ. 2012 Feb;46(2):140-2   [PMID:  22239327 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Can the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) select suitable candidates for interview?
Next Document:  Personalized medicine for lung cancer: new challenges for pathology.