Document Detail


Open vs retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23277372     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Both open ulnar nerve decompression and retractor-endoscopic ulnar nerve decompression have been shown to yield good results. However, a comparative evaluation of the techniques is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of open and endoscopic surgery in cubital tunnel syndrome.
METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients undergoing open (n = 59) or endoscopic (n = 55) decompression of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome were retrospectively compared. The long- and short-term outcomes were compared with respect to the time until return to full activity and the duration of postoperative pain. Additionally, matched pairs between the 2 groups were chosen for analysis (n = 34).
RESULTS: Long-term results in the open vs endoscopic groups were as follows: excellent results, 54.2% vs 56.4%; good results, 23.8% vs 32.7%; fair results, 20.3% vs 9.1%; and poor results, 1.7% vs 1.8%, respectively. For the matched pairs, the results had similar significance levels (P = .84). The times until return to full activity in the open vs the endoscopic groups were as follows: 2 to 7 days, 18.6% vs 76.4%; 7 to 14 days, 55.9% vs 10.9%; and > 14 days, 25.4% vs 12.7% (P < .001 between nonmatched and matched pairs). The durations of postoperative pain in the open vs the endoscopic groups were as follows: 1 to 3 days, 45.8% vs 67.3%; 3 to 10 days, 42.5% vs 25.4%; and > 10 days, 11.7% vs 7.3% (P =.04 for nonmatched and P = .05 for matched pairs).
CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in long-term outcomes after open and retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. The short-term results are significantly better in endoscopic surgery.
Authors:
Stephan Dützmann; K Daniel Martin; Stephan Sobottka; Gerhard Marquardt; Gabriele Schackert; Volker Seifert; Kartik G Krishnan
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Neurosurgery     Volume:  72     ISSN:  1524-4040     ISO Abbreviation:  Neurosurgery     Publication Date:  2013 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-03-21     Completed Date:  2013-12-18     Revised Date:  2014-02-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7802914     Medline TA:  Neurosurgery     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  605-16; discussion 614-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome / diagnosis*,  epidemiology,  surgery*
Decompression, Surgical / adverse effects,  instrumentation,  methods*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neuroendoscopy / adverse effects,  instrumentation,  methods*
Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis*,  epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Ulnar Nerve / pathology,  surgery*
Young Adult
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Neurosurgery. 2014 Feb;74(2):E232-3   [PMID:  24165171 ]
Neurosurgery. 2014 Feb;74(2):E230-2   [PMID:  24165169 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Y-Stent Coiling Of Basilar Bifurcation Aneurysms Induces a Dynamic Angular Vascular Remodeling with ...
Next Document:  Subarachnoid hemorrhage with negative initial catheter angiography: a review of 254 cases evaluating...