Document Detail


Occurrence and adverse effect on outcome of hyperlactatemia in the critically ill.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19523194     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: Hyperlactatemia is frequent in critically ill patients and is often used as a marker of adverse outcome. However, studies to date have focused on selected intensive care unit (ICU) populations. We sought to determine the occurrence and relation of hyperlactatemia with ICU mortality in all patients admitted to four ICUs in a large regional critical care system. METHODS: All adults ([greater than or equal to] 18 years) admitted to ICUs in the Calgary Health Region (population 1.2 million) during 2003 to 2006 were included retrospectively. Lactate determinations were at the discretion of the attending service and hyperlactatemia was defined by a lactate level > 2 mmol/L. RESULTS: A total of 13,932 ICU admissions occurred among 11,581 patients. The median age was 63 years (37% female), the mean APACHE II score was 25 +/- 9 (n = 13,922). At presentation (within first day of admission), 12,246 patients had at least one lactate determination and the median peak lactate was 1.8 (IQR 1.2 to 2.9) mmol/L. The cumulative incidence of at least one documented episode of hyperlactatemia was 5578/13,932 (40%); 5058 (36%) patients had hyperlactatemia at presentation, and a further 520 (4%) developed hyperlactatemia subsequently. The incidence of hyperlactatemia varied significantly by major admitting diagnostic category (P < 0.001) and was highest among neuro/trauma patients 1053/2328 (45%), followed by medical 2047/4935 (41%), other surgical 900/2274 (40%), and cardiac surgical 1578/4395 (36%). Among a cohort of 9107 first admissions with ICU stay of at least one day, both hyperlactatemia at presentation (712/3634 (20%) vs. 289/5473 (5%); P < 0.001) and its later development (101/379 (27%) vs. 188/5094 (4%); P < 0.001) were associated with significantly increased case fatality rates as compared with patients without elevated lactate. After controlling for confounding effects in multivariable logistic regression analysis, hyperlactatemia was an independent risk factor for death. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperlactatemia is common among the critically ill and predicts risk for death.
Authors:
Houman Khosravani; Reza Shahpori; H Thomas Stelfox; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Kevin B Laupland
Related Documents :
629154 - Long-term prognosis of patients with central cerebral ventricular enlargement. a fifth ...
15641394 - Invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients: analysis of risk factors for acquisi...
20519904 - Endotoxin activity level and septic shock: a possible role for specific anti-endotoxin ...
1959374 - Ego bias, reverse ego bias, and physicians' prognostic.
11375374 - A systematic approach to risk stratification and intervention within a managed care env...
7939814 - The value of routine chest radiographs in acute asthma admissions.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study     Date:  2009-06-12
Journal Detail:
Title:  Critical care (London, England)     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1466-609X     ISO Abbreviation:  Crit Care     Publication Date:  2009  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-07-29     Completed Date:  2009-10-28     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9801902     Medline TA:  Crit Care     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  R90     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada. houman.khosravani@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Acid-Base Imbalance / epidemiology*,  mortality
Alberta / epidemiology
Critical Illness / epidemiology*,  mortality
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Incidence
Intensive Care Units / statistics & numerical data
Lactic Acid / blood*
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
50-21-5/Lactic Acid
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Crit Care. 2009;13(4):176   [PMID:  19691816 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  How well do adolescents recall use of mobile telephones? Results of a validation study.
Next Document:  Effective elements of school health promotion across behavioral domains: a systematic review of revi...