Document Detail


Obstetricians' views on prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: 1980 compared with 1993.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  7794848     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the attitudes of obstetricians in England and Wales concerning prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy and to compare these with a similar survey carried out in 1980. METHODS: Postal questionnaires, based on those used in 1980, were sent to a random sample of 555 nonacademic consultant obstetricians, 71% of whom replied. RESULTS: The proportion of consultant obstetricians with a conscientious objection to termination of pregnancy was the same in both surveys, although virtually all conscientious objectors said that they made an exception for serious fetal abnormality. A major change was in the proportion saying that they generally required an undertaking to terminate an affected pregnancy before proceeding with amniocentesis: 75% in 1980 compared with 34% in 1993. As in 1980, lower priority is given to telling women of negative test results than of positive. More obstetricians in 1993 are prepared to consider terminations later in pregnancy, both for fetal abnormality and for social reasons, than was the case in 1980, but many are not prepared to recommend termination as late in pregnancy as the law allows. In some cases this is due to misapprehensions about what is legal. There are particular problems concerning terminations for fetal anomalies that not all would consider serious. One in seven of the 1993 sample would not recommend termination for cystic fibrosis at any gestation. Only 13% would recommend termination for Down's syndrome beyond 24 weeks. There is a need not only for clarification of the law, but also of obstetrician's willingness to implement it.
Authors:
J M Green
Related Documents :
7641968 - Dinoprostone priming of the cervix prior to termination of midgestation pregnancy with ...
22103678 - Hereditary thrombophilia, anti-beta2 glycoprotein 1 igm, and anti-annexin v antibodies ...
20350838 - Late termination of pregnancy and foetal reduction for foetal anomaly.
14528478 - Bony fragments in the uterus: an association with secondary subfertility.
12463608 - Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: safety and efficacy of self-administered complementar...
7572598 - Peripartum cardiomyopathy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology     Volume:  102     ISSN:  0306-5456     ISO Abbreviation:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol     Publication Date:  1995 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1995-08-01     Completed Date:  1995-08-01     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7503752     Medline TA:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  228-32     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Abortion, Induced / psychology*
Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel*
Attitude to Health*
Consultants / psychology
England
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Obstetrics*
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis / psychology*
Random Allocation
Time Factors
Wales

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Does early growth delay occur in diabetic pregnancy?
Next Document:  Measurement of creatine kinase activity and diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.