Document Detail

Observer variability in a phase II trial - assessing consistency in RECIST application.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22432439     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Objective. To assess the consistency of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) application in a phase II trial. Material and methods. Patients with metastatic non-resectable colorectal cancer treated with a combination of an antibody and a chemotherapeutic drug, were included. Computed tomography (CT) scans (thorax, abdomen and pelvis) were performed at baseline and after every fourth treatment cycle. RECIST was intended for response evaluation. The scans were consecutively read by a heterogeneous group of radiologists as a part of daily work and hereafter retrospectively reviewed by a dedicated experienced radiologist. Agreement on best overall response (BOR) between readers and reviewer was quantified using κ-coefficients and the discrepancy rate was correlated with the number of different readers per patient using a χ(2)-test. Results. One hundred patients with 396 CT scans were included. Discrepancies between the readers and the reviewer were found in 47 patients. The majority of discrepancies concerned the application of RECIST. With the review, BOR changed in 17 patients, although, only in six patients the change was potentially treatment altering. Overall, the κ-coefficient of agreement between readers and reviewer was 0.71 (good). However, in the subgroup of responding patients the κ-coefficient was 0.21 (fair). The number of patients with discrepancies was significantly higher with three or more different readers per patient than with less (p =0.0003). Conclusion. RECIST was not consistently applied and the majority of the reader discrepancies were RECIST related. Post review, 17 patients changed BOR; six patients in a potentially treatment altering manner. Additionally, we found that the part of patients with discrepancies increased significantly with more than three different readers per patient. The findings support a peer-review approach where a few dedicated radiologists perform double blinded readings of all the on-going cancer trial patients' CT scans.
Kristin Skougaard; Mark James Dusgaard McCullagh; Dorte Nielsen; Helle Westergren Hendel; Benny Vittrup Jensen; Helle Hjorth Johannesen
Related Documents :
6317729 - Cardiac arrhythmias in systemic amyloidosis: correlation with echocardiographic abnorma...
9671369 - A comparison between the fick method and indirect calorimetry for determining oxygen co...
21607889 - Verification of accuracy and validity of gait phase detection system using motion senso...
12447769 - Implication of transforming growth factor-beta1 in chagas disease myocardiopathy.
2152459 - Non-traumatic chest pain in young adults: a medical audit.
15620939 - Back from irreversibility: extracorporeal life support for prolonged cardiac arrest.
864079 - Surgery on patients receiving anticoagulants.
2335549 - Smoke inhalation and airway management at a regional burn unit: 1974 to 1983. ii. airwa...
21798229 - Contraction delay of the rv outflow tract in patients with brugada syndrome is dependen...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-3-21
Journal Detail:
Title:  Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1651-226X     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-3-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8709065     Medline TA:  Acta Oncol     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev , Denmark.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  False-Positive Meconium Test Results for Fatty Acid Ethyl Esters Secondary to Delayed Sample Collect...
Next Document:  Survival Duration among Patients with a Noncancer Diagnosis Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit: A Re...