| Objective data and quality assurance programs. Current and future trends. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 8118726 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
As CCM has grown, the diversity of ICU patients, as well as that of ICU organization and structure, has grown. This growth has led to numerous questions regarding health care delivery in the ICU. These questions contributed to the development of systems that objectively evaluate the quality of health care delivery in ICUs. Severity of disease scoring systems have been developed and allow for a valid analysis of ICU performance at several levels. These systems should help intensivists determine how health care delivery can be optimized in ICUs. Despite the controversy that surrounds severity of disease scoring and prognostic systems, it is not unreasonable to suggest that, because of the feedback these systems would provide, health care delivery in the ICU would be improved through more extensive use of them at the present time. The information acquired through the use of objective scoring systems ultimately must be used to improve the efficiency of ICUs. The structure and organization of ICUs in the United States, as well as the training of those who treat ICU patients, are excessively diverse, and a more standardized approach to health care delivery in the ICU ultimately will be required. Present information suggests that decentralized ICUs with part-time ICU physicians result in poorer outcomes. The APACHE III study intends to explore these relationships in more detail. Certainly, more studies looking at these issues are needed, but we are at least beginning to answer the questions that resulted from the rapid growth of critical care in the 1980s. The SCCM data suggest two possible alternatives, not necessarily exclusive of each other: (1) A large percentage of ICUs may be obligated to undergo structural changes in the near future. (2) Regionalization of critical care, already present, may continue. Certain rural areas may find it more expedient to send the most critically ill patients to tertiary centers in nearby cities, as opposed to a wholesale upgrading of the delivery of care in their own ICUs. Ultimately, all hospitals will be obligated to provide patients access to the highest quality of critical care. |
| | |
Authors:
|
H S Rafkin; J W Hoyt |
Related Documents
:
|
8366316 - Metaphor graphics to support integrated decision making with respiratory data. 19825486 - Postoperative delirium in the elderly surgical patient. 17236506 - Inside and somewhat outside charity. 8340636 - Enhancing recovery via neuro-rehab rounds. 11286446 - Necrotizing fasciitis of odontogenic origin in ibadan, nigeria. 16705846 - The tcm-combined treatment for aphasia due to cerebrovascular disorders. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Review |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Critical care clinics Volume: 10 ISSN: 0749-0704 ISO Abbreviation: Crit Care Clin Publication Date: 1994 Jan |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 1994-04-06 Completed Date: 1994-04-06 Revised Date: 2004-11-17 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8507720 Medline TA: Crit Care Clin Country: UNITED STATES |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 157-77 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Critical Care Medicine, St. Francis Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Certification Cost-Benefit Analysis Decision Making, Organizational Forecasting Hospital Mortality Humans Intensive Care Units* / organization & administration Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data Logistic Models Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / organization & administration* Physician Executives / standards Prognosis Quality Assurance, Health Care / organization & administration* Risk Factors Severity of Illness Index* |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: The use of intensive care unit severity scoring systems in reimbursement strategies.
Next Document: Predictors of outcome from critical illness. Shock and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.