|Nutritional geometry provides food for thought.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 19502592 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|Dietary Restriction extends lifespan in a diverse range of animals, but this often comes at a cost to reproduction. While a number of molecular pathways integral to these relationships have been characterised, we still do not fully understand whether restriction of specific nutrients or calories is responsible. Two recent studies on insects have offered novel insights into this longstanding issue via the application of Nutritional Geometry. This technique promises to significantly advance our understanding of how nutrition influences reproduction and longevity.|
|C Ruth Archer; Nick Royle; Sandra South; Colin Selman; John Hunt|
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review Date: 2009-06-05|
|Title: The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences Volume: 64 ISSN: 1758-535X ISO Abbreviation: J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. Publication Date: 2009 Sep|
|Created Date: 2009-08-05 Completed Date: 2009-08-25 Revised Date: 2013-06-02|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 9502837 Medline TA: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Country: United States|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 956-9 Citation Subset: AIM; IM|
|Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Drosophila melanogaster / physiology
Longevity / physiology*
Reproduction / physiology*
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
Journal ID (hwp): gerona
Journal ID (publisher-id): gerona
Publisher: Oxford University Press
? 2009 The Author(s).
Received Day: 28 Month: 1 Year: 2009
Accepted Day: 4 Month: 5 Year: 2009
Print publication date: Month: 9 Year: 2009
Electronic publication date: Day: 5 Month: 6 Year: 2009
pmc-release publication date: Day: 5 Month: 6 Year: 2009
Volume: 64A Issue: 9
First Page: 956 Last Page: 959
PubMed Id: 19502592
|Nutritional Geometry Provides Food for Thought|
|C. Ruth Archer1|
1Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn
2Integrative Physiology, Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen
|Correspondence: Address correspondence to John Hunt, PhD, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK. Email: J.Hunt@exeter.ac.uk
Decision Editor: Huber R. Warner, PhD
Animals consuming a diet restricted in some, as of yet, unidentified component but with adequate nutrients so as to avoid malnutrition, typically show extended lifespan (1?3), improved health (4) and delayed aging (5). This treatment, termed Dietary Restriction (DR), has been shown to increase longevity across a broad range of species (6). However, despite over seventy years of research, the mechanisms underlying this process are poorly understood. Whilst DR's life extending properties have often been attributed to Caloric Restriction (CR) (7?9), accumulating research shows that, in some species, a limited intake of specific nutrients is necessary and sufficient to increase lifespan (3,10?12). For example, diets restricted in either yeast or sugar increased longevity and decreased mortality rate in Drosophila melanogaster, despite these effects being unrelated to the calorific content of the diet (3). Protein restriction has been reported to both extend (13) and reduce (5) lifespan in rodents. The magnitude of the response of longevity, and/or of oxidative stress to methionine restriction varies across species relative to the responses induced by CR (10,14), whether this extreme dietary manipulation operates via the same mechanisms as more mild DR treatments is unclear. Furthermore, there is debate regarding whether DR slows the rate of ageing or only delays its onset, with support for either hypothesis derived from studies of a number of different species (reviewed in (15)). Whilst DR protocols should be flexible, devised in each laboratory on the basis of the diet optimal for fecundity and lifespan of the species or specific population being examined (16), it will remain unclear whether divergent responses reflect species specific idiosyncrasies or differences in methodologies until a robust practical framework can be applied that allows across species comparisons.
In contrast to the positive effects of DR on lifespan, reproductive output is often greatly reduced by DR. Life-history theory predicts that if reproduction is costly, it should be traded against longevity (17). Thus, a decrease in reproductive effort with DR may occur if longevity is prioritised over reproduction (18,19). However, the effect of DR may differ between the sexes due to different nutritional requirements (20) and variation in the nature of any trade-offs between reproduction and longevity. Females require greater protein for egg production, whilst males need more carbohydrates to fuel sexual display (21). If these macronutrients differentially affect longevity, restriction of either will influence reproduction and/or lifespan differently in each sex and set the stage for intersexual conflict over optimal diet (22).
Many studies have documented associations between reproductive effort, nutrition and senescence, yet no general consensus has been reached as to the mechanisms underlying the interactions between these factors (23). There are a number of possible reasons for this. One of the main issues concerns whether the effects of DR on longevity are primarily artefacts of laboratory environments. Foremost, given that there is little data available on food consumption patterns of animals in the wild, the beneficial effects of DR may simply reflect the adverse effects of overfeeding in the lab (24,25). Methodological limitations also pose problems. Empirically uncoupling the effects of calories from those of the nutrients from which they are derived remains a major challenge. Perhaps as a consequence of this, DR studies often apply too few dietary treatments and therefore, only explore a limited nutritional landscape (25). In addition, it is difficult to accurately quantify food consumption in lower organisms, especially where liquid diets are used and restriction is accomplished via nutrient dilution. Without precise measurements of dietary consumption it may not be possible to detect compensatory feeding (24,26); where animals consume greater quantities of diluted nutrients so as to regulate intake (25) and inadvertently mitigate the effects of DR. Studies seldom address assimilation efficiency, which may not be constant across an organism's lifetime. Moreover, animals are often housed in mixed sex groups where sexual activity and reproductive investment are not controlled (26,27). Even in studies where reproductive effort has been measured, it is often measured with greater precision (and more frequently) in females than in males (28?32). This is possibly due to the relative ease with which female reproductive effort can be quantified in laboratory model organisms (counting eggs) compared with measuring lifetime investment by males in sexual signalling.
Two recent studies on insects have overcome many of these limitations via the application of Nutritional Geometry (NG). The progress made with this technique not only advances our understanding of the link between DR and ageing but also provides a practical framework that promises to further progress research on this topic.
The NG protocol is detailed elsewhere (33,34) and the benefits of this technique specific to ageing research are comprehensively reviewed by Simpson and Raubenheimer (35). Using NG performance and behaviour can be investigated in a multidimensional nutritional framework, which aims to differentiate between nutrient intake and utilisation. Essentially, NG entails varying the concentrations and ratios of nutrients in the diet and then accurately measuring their intake in a series of feeding trials. Quantifying the intake for each unique nutrient combination allows the construction of a fine-scale nutritional surface with as many dimensions as there are nutrients being examined. On this surface, performance traits (such as lifespan or rates of ageing) can be mapped (see Figure 1). This enables powerful statistical analysis using response surface methodologies to examine both the independent effect of and the interaction between the different dietary components on the performance trait to be examined. Feeding trials where individuals are given the choice between two diets can then be used to examine the behavioural rules that govern dietary intake and to identify the ?intake target? or nutritional point to which an animal feeds. This intake target may be ?static?, i.e. a point integrated over time, or ?dynamic?, in which case it is possible to track its trajectory as an animal grows, develops, reproduces or senesces. With respect to ageing, this means that the effects of DR can be examined relative to these intake targets rather than laboratory standards.
Lee et al. (25) employed NG in an elegant study of D. melanogaster. Liquid diet of varying protein and carbohydrate ratio and concentration was provided in microcapillary tubes and consumption measured according to a scale bar. Longevity was greatest at a low Protein - Carbohydrate ratio (P:C) of 1:16, in both their empirical study and associated meta-analysis. The long life observed under low protein consumption was attributed to a reduction in initial mortality and retarded acceleration of age-dependent mortality. Other studies of Drosophila have found only initial mortality rate to be affected by DR (20). This discrepancy may be because yeast, which features in dietary treatments used in this paper as well as many others examining Drosophila, has uncharacterised odorants known to affect longevity (36). In Drosophila, restoration of chemosensory signals completely reverses the reduction of initial mortality rate seen in DR animals but not that attributable to a reduced rate of age dependent acceleration (36). Yen and Mobbs (36) propose that the relative roles of reduced initial mortality versus retardation of the subsequent trajectory of mortality depend on the relative contributions of chemosensory and metabolic mechanisms. Given these findings, it is clear that future studies should place greater emphasis on partitioning the effects of chemosensory stimuli from consumption.
Lee et al. (25) found that the fecundity of mated females was optimized under higher protein: the rate of egg production peaked at a P:C of 1:2 and lifetime egg production at a P:C of 1:4. The difference in optimal P:C for longevity and fecundity suggests a trade-off, however, it appears that the interplay between reproduction and lifespan is not integral to determining how the latter responds to DR, as suggested by past research (37,38). Since the P:C contour lines ran almost perpendicularly to the isocaloric line on the nutrient surface that traverses diets composed of equal caloric value, it reveals that calories per se did not have a significant influence on any of the investigated life history attributes. There was evidence of compensatory feeding and active regulation of nutrient intake, with flies consuming a P:C ratio corresponding to that which maximises lifetime reproductive success across a range of nutrient concentrations.
Maklakov et al. (21) used similar methods to investigate senescence in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Male T. commodus call to attract females; this energetic sexual advertisement is associated with a four-fold increase in metabolic rate (39) and is under strong selection through female choice (40). In a no-choice test, 24 powdered diets were provided in excess and intake measured by weighing the dried food every 3 days throughout the cricket's lifetimes. Male calling effort was monitored using an acoustic call chamber and the fecundity of mated females quantified by counting the number of eggs produced. Two choice experiments were also conducted: the first provided isocaloric diets that differed in their P:C ratio and the second a choice between three pairs of foods that varied in both their P:C ratio and energetic content.
As was the case for D. melanogaster, lifespan was maximised on a low P:C ratio. However, in T. commodus male longevity declined with high carbohydrate consumption, whilst, in either sex, as the P:C intake ratio increased, longevity decreased. This study provides the first, clear evidence that there is potential for sexual conflict over optimal diet. Male calling effort is greatest at the P:C ratio that maximises lifespan. This contradicts past work suggesting that male reproductive effort in T. commodus trades-off with longevity (19). Conversely, in females, greater dietary protein increases fecundity but decreases longevity (21). This trade-off between female reproductive fitness and long life does not manifest itself in a female's choice of diet: whilst there is evidence of active regulation of diet influenced, in part, by total nutrient value, and females consume slightly more protein than males, there is little sexual dimorphism in diet. Whilst neither sex apparently chooses the diet that maximises lifetime reproductive success in the laboratory conditions in which they were tested, female fecundity is highly compromised by their choice of diet.
These studies add to a growing body of evidence that protein restriction, not CR per se, is primarily responsible for longevity extension under DR regimes in insect species. Whilst there is evidence for a reproduction-longevity trade-off, with sex and species specific differences in its magnitude, this is not the sole influence over longevity extension under DR. The study by Maklakov et al. (21), which highlights the potential for intersexual conflict over diet choice, provides scope for research examining the genetic basis of such conflict, its prevalence and resolution. NG may also facilitate investigation of the mechanistic basis of ageing. For example, the free radical theory (41), which attempts to explain the mechanistic basis of ageing, proposes that accumulation of oxidative damage induced by ROS causes the functional decline that characterises senescence. Mapping ROS- induced oxidative damage onto the geometric framework may provide a further, and potentially more powerful, test of this theory.
NG requires a large number of experimental animals and is therefore both costly and labour intensive to implement. This has, so far, limited its application to insects. There is strong evidence that DR operates differently in mammals and insects (reviewed in 15), and so the application of this conceptual framework across taxa is likely to prove informative. Methionine restriction has been shown to increase longevity in some species (11). It has been postulated that this is due to disruption of either carbohydrate (35) or protein (15) metabolism. Simpson and Raubenheimer (35) suggest that NG may enable the interaction between these nutrients to be assessed and these alternate hypotheses addressed. Moreover, they propose this may be feasible in mammals were the nutritional surface investigated first restricted on the basis of preliminary trials.
Given that other research has drawn similar conclusions regarding the role of specific nutrients in influencing longevity (e.g. 3) to those of Lee and colleagues (25) and Maklakov et al. (21) is the added expense justified? Obviously where only one nutrient is being investigated, application of this technique is excessive. However, while other has approaches have made qualitatively similar conclusions, NG has more accurately quantified the relationship between calories, specific nutrients, longevity and sex. Protocols previously employed for investigating the contributions of specific nutrients to longevity extension under DR, have commonly varied the concentration of one nutrient at a time, whilst holding all others constant (e.g. 10), this does not allow interactions between nutrients to be assessed. Authors have recently stressed the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to ageing research (22, 42, 43). NG aims to integrate physiology, behaviour and life-history parameters within a comprehensive nutritional framework and, in doing so, provides a robust platform on which to build such a research approach.
CA was funded by a NERC studentship awarded to JH and NR. NR was funded by NERC. SS was on a visiting studentship funded by Kungliga Fysiografiska S?llskapet i Lund, Anna Maria Lundins Stipendiefond- Sm?lands Nation and Zoologiska Stiftelsen. JH was funded by NERC and a Royal Society Fellowship. We thank Dave Hosken for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
|1..||McCay CM,Crowell MF,Maynard LA. The effect of retarded growth upon the length of life span and upon the ultimate body sizeJ NutrYear: 1935106379|
|2..||Jiang JC,Jaruga E,Repnevskaya MV,Jazwinski SM. An intervention resembling caloric restriction prolongs life span and retards aging in yeastFASEB JYear: 2000142135213711024000|
|3..||Mair W,Piper MD,Partridge L. Calories do not explain extension of life span by dietary restriction in DrosophilaPLoS BiolYear: 20053e22316000018|
|4..||Klurfeld DM,Weber MM,Kritchevsky D. Inhibition of chemically induced mammary and colon tumor promotion by caloric restriction in rats fed increased dietary fatCancer ResYear: 198747275927623567901|
|5..||Weindruch R,Walford RL,Fligiel S,Guthrie D. The retardation of aging in mice by dietary restriction: Longevity, cancer, immunity and lifetime energy intakeJ NutrYear: 19861166416543958810|
|6..||Masoro EJ. Caloric Restriction: A Key to Understanding and Modulating AgingYear: 2002Amsterdam, The NetherlandsElsevier|
|7..||Ball ZB,Barnes RH,Visscher MB. The effects of dietary caloric restriction on maturity and senescence, with particular reference to fertility and longevityAm J PhysiolYear: 1947150511519|
|8..||Ross MH. Length of life and caloric intakeAm J Clin NutrYear: 1972258348385046728|
|9..||Masoro EJ. Assessment of nutritional components in prolongation of life and health by dietProc Soc Exp Biol MedYear: 199019331342294520|
|10..||Troen AM,French EE,Roberts JF,et al. Lifespan modification by glucose and methionine in Drosophila melanogaster fed a chemically defined dietAgeYear: 200729293919424828|
|11..||Richie JP,Leutzinger Y,Parthasarathy S,Malloy V,Orentreich N,Zimmerman JA. Methionine restriction increases blood glutathione and longevity in F344 ratsFASEB JYear: 19948130213078001743|
|12..||Miller RA,Buehner G,Chang Y,Harper JM,Sigler R,Smith-Wheelock M. Methionine-deficient diet extends mouse lifespan, slows immune and lens aging, alters glucose, T4, IGF-1 and insulin levels, and increases hepatocyte MIF levels and stress resistanceAging CellYear: 2005411912515924568|
|13..||Barrows CH,Kokkonen G. Protein synthesis, development, growth and lifespanGrowthYear: 1975395255331205236|
|14..||Caro P,G?mez J,L?pez-Torres M,et al. Forty percent and eighty percent methionine restriction decrease mitochondrial ROS generation and oxidative stress in rat liverBiogerontologyYear: 2008918319618283555|
|15..||Masoro EJ. Caloric restriction and aging: Controversial issuesJ Gerontol Biol Sci Med SciYear: 200661A1419|
|16..||Piper MD,Bartke A. Diet and agingCell MetabYear: 200889910418680711|
|17..||Roff DA. Life-History EvolutionYear: 20021st edMassachusettsSinauer Associates|
|18..||Holliday R. Food, reproduction and longevity: Is the extended lifespan of calorie-restricted animals an evolutionary adaptation?BioessaysYear: 1989101251272730632|
|19..||Hunt J,Brooks R,Jennions MD,Smith MJ,Bentsen CL,Bussi?re LF. High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die youngNatureYear: 20044321024102715616562|
|20..||Magwere T,Chapman T,Partridge L. Sex differences in the effect of dietary restriction on life span and mortality rates in female and male Drosophila melanogasterJ Gerontol Biol Sci Med SciYear: 200459A39|
|21..||Maklakov AA,Simpson SJ,Zajitschek F,et al. Sex-specific fitness effects of nutrient intake on reproduction and lifespanCurr BiolYear: 2008181062106618635354|
|22..||Bonduriansky R,Maklakov A,Zajitschek F,Brooks R. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life spanFunct EcolYear: 200822443453|
|23..||Masoro EJ. Overview of caloric restriction and ageingMech Ageing DevYear: 200512691392215885745|
|24..||Mockett RJ,Cooper TM,Orr WC,Sohal RS. Effects of caloric restriction are species-specificBiogerontologyYear: 2006715716016628489|
|25..||Lee KP,Simpson SJ,Clissold FJ,et al. Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila: New insights from nutritional geometryProc Natl Acad Sci U S AYear: 20081052498250318268352|
|26..||Piper MD,Partridge L. Dietary restriction in Drosophila: Delayed aging or experimental artefact?PLoS GenetYear: 20073e5717465680|
|27..||Inness CL,Metcalfe NB. The impact of dietary restriction, intermittent feeding and compensatory growth on reproductive investment and lifespan in a short-lived fishProc R Soc Lond B Biol SciYear: 200827517031708|
|28..||Rose MR,Charlesworth B. Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Exploratory selection experimentsGeneticsYear: 1981971871966790341|
|29..||Rose MR. Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogasterEvolutionYear: 19843810041010|
|30..||Partridge L,Fowler K. Direct and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogasterEvolutionYear: 1992467691|
|31..||Carey JR,Liedo P,M?ller H-G,Wang J-L,Vaupel JW. Dual modes of ageing in Mediterranean fruit fly femalesScienceYear: 19982819969989703516|
|32..||Sgr? CM,Partridge L. A delayed wave of death from reproduction in DrosophilaScienceYear: 19992862521252510617470|
|33..||Simpson SJ,Raubenheimer D. A multi-level analysis of feeding behaviour: The geometry of nutritional decisionsPhilos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol SciYear: 1993342381402|
|34..||Simpson SJ,Raubenheimer D. The geometric analysis of feeding and nutrition: A user's guideJ Insect PhysiolYear: 199541545553|
|35..||Simpson SJ,Raubenheimer D. Caloric restriction and aging revisited: The need for a geometric analysis of the nutritional bases of agingJ Gerontol Biol Sci Med SciYear: 200762A707713|
|36..||Yen K,Mobbs CV. Chemosensory and caloric mechanisms influence distinct components of mortality rateExp GerontolYear: 2008431058106018790043|
|37..||Barnes AI,Boone JM,Jacobson J,Partridge L,Chapman T. No extension of lifespan by ablation of germ line in DrosophilaProc R Soc Lond B Biol SciYear: 2006273939947|
|38..||Mair W,Sgr? CM,Johnson AP,Chapman T,Partridge L. Lifespan extension by dietary restriction in female Drosophila melanogaster is not caused by a reduction in vitellogenesis or ovarian activityExp GerontolYear: 2004391011101915236760|
|39..||Kavanaugh MN. The efficiency of sound production in two cricket species, Gryllotalpa australis and Teleogryllus commodus (Orthoptera: Grylloidea)J Exp BiolYear: 1987130107119|
|40..||Bentsen CL,Hunt J,Jennions MD,Brooks R. Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signalling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodusAm NatYear: 2006167102106|
|41..||Beckman KB,Ames BN. The free radical theory of aging maturesPhysiol RevYear: 1998785475819562038|
|42..||Lessels K,Colegrave N. Molecular signals or Loi de balancement?Trends Ecol EvolYear: 20011628428511369104|
|43..||Barnes AI,Partridge L. Costing reproductionAnim BehavYear: 200366199204|
Keywords: Nutritional geometry, Reproduction, Longevity.
Previous Document: Fenofibrate and PBA prevent fatty acid-induced loss of adiponectin receptor and pAMPK in human hepat...
Next Document: Aging-associated alteration of subtelomeric methylation in Parkinson's disease.