Document Detail


Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21: systematic review and report of quality and outcomes of diagnostic accuracy studies performed between 1997 and 2012.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23396607     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUNDResearch on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of fetal trisomy 21 is developing fast. Commercial tests have become available. To provide an up-to-date overview of NIPT of trisomy 21, an evaluation of the methodological quality and outcomes of diagnostic accuracy studies was made.METHODSWe undertook a systematic review of the literature published between 1997 and 2012 after searching PubMed, using MeSH terms 'RNA', 'DNA' and 'Down Syndrome' in combination with 'cell-free fetal (cff) RNA', 'cffDNA', 'trisomy 21' and 'noninvasive prenatal diagnosis' and searching reference lists of reported literature. From 79 abstracts, 16 studies were included as they evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a molecular technique for NIPT of trisomy 21, and the test sensitivity and specificity were reported. Meta-analysis could not be performed due to the use of six different molecular techniques and different cutoff points. Diagnostic parameters were derived or calculated, and possible bias and applicability were evaluated utilizing the revised tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2).RESULTSSeven of the included studies were recently published in large cohort studies that examined massively parallel sequencing (MPS), with or without pre-selection of chromosomes, and reported sensitivities between 98.58% [95% confidence interval (CI) 95.9-99.5%] and 100% (95% CI 96-100%) and specificities between 97.95% (95% CI 94.1-99.3%) and 100% (95% CI 99.1-100%). None of these seven large studies had an overall low risk of bias and low concerns regarding applicability. MPS with or without pre-selection of chromosomes exhibits an excellent negative predictive value (100%) in conditions with disease odds from 1:1500 to 1:200. However, positive predictive values were lower, even in high-risk pregnancies (19.7-100%). The other nine cohort studies were too small to give precise estimates (number of trisomy 21 cases: ≤25) and were not included in the discussion.CONCLUSIONSNIPT of trisomy 21 by MPS with or without pre-selection of chromosomes is promising and likely to replace the prenatal serum screening test that is currently combined with nuchal translucency measurement in the first trimester of pregnancy. Before NIPT can be introduced as a screening test in a social insurance health-care system, more evidence is needed from large prospective diagnostic accuracy studies in first trimester pregnancies. Moreover, we believe further assessment, of whether NIPT can be provided in a cost-effective, timely and equitable manner for every pregnant woman, is required.
Authors:
E Mersy; L J M Smits; L A A P van Winden; C E M de Die-Smulders; ; A D C Paulussen; M V E Macville; A B C Coumans; S G M Frints
Related Documents :
17273227 - Sex and pregnancy: a perinatal educator's guide.
11097507 - Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: are they different?
1310367 - The finnish family competence study. childbearing attitudes in pregnant nulliparae.
6511217 - Psychological and social disorders of turkish women during an unaccepted pregnancy in a...
21041007 - Ultrasound screening during pregnancy in iran: womens' expectations, experiences and nu...
8567797 - Weight loss results in significant improvement in pregnancy and ovulation rates in anov...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-2-8
Journal Detail:
Title:  Human reproduction update     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1460-2369     ISO Abbreviation:  Hum. Reprod. Update     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-2-11     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9507614     Medline TA:  Hum Reprod Update     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Genetics, Reproductive Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Genetic variability in the multidrug resistance associated protein-1 (ABCC1/MRP1) predicts hematolog...
Next Document:  Triadin regulates cardiac muscle couplon structure and microdomain Ca(2+) signalling: a path towards...