Document Detail

No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23389069     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopy has been reported to be a safe and feasible alternative to traditional laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare short-term results in patients with colonic cancer who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic colonic resection (RC) or laparoscopic colonic resection (LC). METHODS: The study was a retrospective case control study of all patients with colonic cancer who underwent RC from March 2010 to March 2012 or LC from January 2009 to December 2011 at a tertiary-care university hospital. Data were retrieved from the national chart database and patient journals. Biochemical markers [C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin, white blood cell count, and thrombocyte count] were recorded before surgery and for the first 3 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients underwent RC and 162 patients underwent LC. There were no significant differences in the rate of conversion to open surgery, number of permanent enterostomies, number of intraoperative complications, level of postoperative cellular stress response, number of postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, or 30-day mortality between the two groups. There was a significantly longer setup time for RC (77.1 vs. 69.7 min, P = 0.000), but surgical time was significantly shorter for RC (165.8 vs. 183.4 min, P = 0.006) and there was no difference in the overall procedure time (254.0 vs. 243.6 min, P = 0.086). CONCLUSION: We found RC to be a safe and feasible alternative to LC for colonic cancer. We found that for RC surgical time was shorter and overall procedure time was comparable to that for LC; however, these results should be confirmed in future randomized clinical trials.
Neel Maria Helvind; Jens Ravn Eriksen; Anders Mogensen; Buket Tas; Jesper Olsen; Mads Bundgaard; Henrik Loft Jakobsen; Ismail Gögenür
Related Documents :
24220409 - Distal transsylvian-traninsular approach for the putaminal hypertensive hemorrhages: su...
24487169 - Laparoscopic frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis.
24063099 - Review of 23 cases of postintubation tracheal obstructions in birds.
23997729 - Complete digital amputations undergoing replantation surgery: a 10-year retrospective s...
23203639 - Upper airway manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
24946339 - The use of intraoperative cholangiogram during laparoscopic double cholecystectomy.
7278349 - Surgical management of acute dissections involving the ascending aorta. early and late ...
16200619 - Congenital cystic lung lesions: is surgical resection essential?
8423919 - A team process for the introduction of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique to a ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-2-7
Journal Detail:
Title:  Surgical endoscopy     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1432-2218     ISO Abbreviation:  Surg Endosc     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-2-7     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8806653     Medline TA:  Surg Endosc     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark,
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP)...
Next Document:  Blunt versus bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of random...