Document Detail


No benefit of the two-incision THA over mini-posterior THA: a pilot study of strength and gait.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19330394     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Proponents of the two-incision minimally invasive approach for THA have claimed recovery is dramatically better than after other methods of THA, but this has not been confirmed with any objective data. We designed a prospective randomized trial of the two-incision THA versus the mini-posterior technique to determine whether patients having two-incision THA, when compared with patients having mini-posterior THA, had evidence of less muscle damage as reflected by changes in hip muscle strength after surgery, a less antalgic gait as reflected by changes in the single-leg stance time and walking velocity, and better hip function as reflected by changes in the hip moments during level walking and stair climbing as assessed by comprehensive gait analysis testing. Twenty-one patients, including 13 men and eight women, were prospectively randomized to either the two-incision or the mini-posterior approach and completed preoperative and 6-week postoperative three-dimensional gait analyses and isometric strength testing. We found no evidence that patients who had two-incision THA had less muscle damage, less antalgic gait, or better gait kinematics than patients who had mini-posterior THA. Instead, when there was a difference in strength or gait parameters, it was the patients who had mini-posterior THA who tended to have quicker recovery. Level of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors:
Aaron J Krych; Mark W Pagnano; Krista Coleman Wood; R Michael Meneghini; Kenton Kaufmann
Related Documents :
17397844 - Evaluation and treatment of pelvic metastases.
18812894 - Early outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in the athletic a...
6614864 - Is there an association between abo blood groups and primary osteoarthrosis of the hip?
11927994 - Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years of age following developmental...
21306224 - Periodontal health and relative quantity of subgingival porphyromonas gingivalis during...
22791654 - Effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on clinical outcomes following transapical transc...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial     Date:  2009-03-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  Clinical orthopaedics and related research     Volume:  468     ISSN:  1528-1132     ISO Abbreviation:  Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.     Publication Date:  2010 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-01-15     Completed Date:  2010-02-08     Revised Date:  2013-06-02    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0075674     Medline TA:  Clin Orthop Relat Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  565-70     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects,  methods*
Biomechanics
Female
Gait*
Hip Joint / physiopathology,  surgery*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength*
Osteoarthritis, Hip / physiopathology,  surgery*
Pilot Projects
Prospective Studies
Range of Motion, Articular
Recovery of Function
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Application of curative therapy in the ward. 1920.
Next Document:  The role of executive cognitive functions in changing substance use: what we know and what we need t...