| Niche players in health policy: medical specialty societies in Congress 1969-2002. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20702014 Owner: NLM Status: In-Process |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Scholars and commentators alike have long used 'organized medicine' as shorthand for the American Medical Association (AMA). However, organized medicine has increasingly shown signs of fragmentation into specialty societies over the last two decades. While the AMA remains the largest association of physicians, and wields a great deal of influence in political circles, its use as a proxy for organized medicine may warrant reevaluation due to the changing political organization of medicine. We developed a unique database of specialty medical society appearances before all Congressional committees by combining records from Lexis-Nexis Congressional and the Policy Agendas database. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the participation of specialty societies by committee and by hearing type. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) was used to measure whether specialty societies develop niche roles with specific committees, and the Chi-Square Goodness of Fit test was used to study the distribution of specialty society testimonies in health hearings more formally. We found that although the AMA participates in Congressional hearings at a higher rate than any other individual medical specialty society, it accounts for a decreasing percentage of all specialty society appearances over time. In addition, specialty societies have developed niche and monopoly roles in health policymaking as well as relationships with particular congressional committees over time. We conclude that the increasing participation of specialty medical societies in the policymaking process is important because medical societies do not testify solely to promote the economic self-interest of their members. Specialization in medicine has segmented lobbying roles, such that specialty societies have a different focus than the AMA. Thus, 'organized medicine' and the AMA are no longer synonymous. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Aaron Rabinowitz; Miriam Laugesen |
Related Documents
:
|
1629674 - Practical approach to investigative ethics and religious objections to the autopsy. 2073554 - Methodologies for clinical ethics. 16017634 - 1973 meeting in kansas city. 19268804 - A history of ethics and law in the intensive care unit. 21284454 - Egas moniz (1874-1955) and the "invention" of modern psychosurgery: a historical and et... 17425194 - How technology is reshaping the practice of nongynecologic cytology: frontiers of cytol... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2010-08-10 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Social science & medicine (1982) Volume: 71 ISSN: 1873-5347 ISO Abbreviation: Soc Sci Med Publication Date: 2010 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-09-09 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8303205 Medline TA: Soc Sci Med Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1341-8 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. arabinow@fas.harvard.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Lean healthcare: Rhetoric, ritual and resistance.
Next Document: [The sheep as a large animal experimental model in respiratory diseases research].