| Neurosurgeons' perspectives on psychosurgery and neuroenhancement: a qualitative study at one center. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20524827 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
OBJECT: Advances in the neurosciences are stirring debate regarding the ethical issues surrounding novel neurosurgical interventions. The application of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treating refractory psychiatric disease, for instance, has introduced the prospect of altering disorders of mind and behavior and the potential for neuroenhancement. The attitudes of current and future providers of this technology and their position regarding its possible future applications are unknown. The authors sought to gauge the opinions of neurosurgical staff and trainees toward various uses of neuromodulation technology including psychosurgery and neuroenhancement. METHODS: The authors conducted a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with 47 neurosurgery staff, trainees, and other neuroclinicians at a quaternary care center. RESULTS: Several general themes emerged from the interviews. These included universal support for psychosurgery given adequate informed consent and rigorous scientific methodology, as well as a relative consensus regarding the priority given to patient autonomy and the preservation of personal identity. Participants' attitudes toward the future use of DBS and other means of neuromodulation for cognitive enhancement and personality alteration revealed less agreement, although most participants felt that alteration of nonpathological traits is objectionable. CONCLUSIONS: There is support in the neurosurgical community for the surgical management of refractory psychiatric disease. The use of neuromodulation for the alteration of nonpathological traits is morally and ethically dubious when it is out of sync with the values of society at large. Both DBS and neuromodulation will have far-reaching and profound public health implications. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Daniel Mendelsohn; Nir Lipsman; Mark Bernstein |
Related Documents
:
|
7612077 - Ethical issues in sponsored clinical research. 18685297 - Defining an appropriate ethical, social and regulatory framework for clinical xenotrans... 10415277 - The relationship between ethics and phronesis. 22581987 - Differences in trouble per litre of different alcoholic beverages - a global comparison... 10657177 - Patterns of annual seed production by northern hemisphere trees: a global perspective. 21921437 - Future directions of neurology -breakthrough to the next stage-. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2010-06-04 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of neurosurgery Volume: 113 ISSN: 1933-0693 ISO Abbreviation: J. Neurosurg. Publication Date: 2010 Dec |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-12-02 Completed Date: 2011-01-03 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0253357 Medline TA: J Neurosurg Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1212-8 Citation Subset: AIM; IM |
Affiliation:
|
Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Attitude of Health Personnel* Deep Brain Stimulation / ethics* Female Humans Informed Consent Interviews as Topic Male Middle Aged Neurosurgery / ethics* Neurosurgical Procedures / ethics* Psychosurgery / ethics* Young Adult |
| Grant Support | |
ID/Acronym/Agency:
|
80045//Canadian Institutes of Health Research |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Magnetic resonance imaging dynamics of contrast medium uptake in vestibular schwannomas.
Next Document: Erratum.