| Negative results: why do they need to be published? | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22188851 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
This short narrative review article defines 'negative results' and cites several ethical and scientific reasons why such studies should be made publicly available. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Peter Sandercock |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society Volume: 7 ISSN: 1747-4949 ISO Abbreviation: Int J Stroke Publication Date: 2012 Jan |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-12-22 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 101274068 Medline TA: Int J Stroke Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 32-3 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
© 2011 The Author. International Journal of Stroke © 2011 World Stroke Organization. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: A qualitative study on overuse injuries: The beliefs of athletes and coaches.
Next Document: Stem cells and stroke: are we further away than anyone is willing to admit?