Document Detail

Natural family planning: physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20707956     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To assess physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice with respect to four evidence-based natural family planning (NFP) methods: Standard Days, cervical mucus, basal body temperature, and the lactational amenorrhea method. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of family physicians and all gynaecologists in British Columbia (n = 460) who have women of reproductive age in their practice, as well as all affiliated residents (n = 239). Main outcome measures were (1) physicians' attitudes towards NFP and their perceptions of its effectiveness; (2) the relationship between physicians' demographic factors, their personal experience or beliefs, and their attitudes and knowledge; and (3) how these factors affect the counselling physicians offer their patients. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 44%. Only 3% to 6% of physicians had correct knowledge of the effectiveness in perfect use of the NFP methods cited in this study. Fifty percent of physicians who responded mention NFP to their patients as an option for contraception, and 77% of physicians mention NFP as an option to couples trying to conceive. Family physicians and residents were much more likely than gynaecologists or gynaecology residents to mention NFP during counselling. Older physicians were more likely to mention NFP than younger physicians and also had more personal experience with NFP. CONCLUSION: Most physicians in our study underestimated the effectiveness of NFP methods, and only a small proportion of physicians provide information about NFP during contraceptive counselling. Physicians need better understanding of modern methods of NFP to provide evidence-based contraceptive counselling to selected highly motivated patients who prefer NFP as a contraceptive choice.
Joyce Choi; Sherry Chan; Ellen Wiebe
Related Documents :
12436216 - Discussion of the do-not-resuscitate order: a pilot study of perceptions of patients wi...
12019596 - How acceptable are financial incentives and written feedback for improving hypertension...
20546626 - Collaboration between physicians and a hospital-based palliative care team in a general...
18189306 - Determinants of breast cancer knowledge among newly diagnosed, low-income, medically un...
22186296 - Occupational hazards of hospital personnel: assessment of a safe alternative to formald...
22142436 - The longitudinal bmi pattern and body composition of patients with anorexia nervosa who...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstétrique et gynécologie du Canada : JOGC     Volume:  32     ISSN:  1701-2163     ISO Abbreviation:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can     Publication Date:  2010 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-08-16     Completed Date:  2010-09-29     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101126664     Medline TA:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can     Country:  Canada    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  673-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Attitude of Health Personnel*
British Columbia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Middle Aged
Natural Family Planning Methods*
Physician's Practice Patterns / statistics & numerical data*
Physicians, Family

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Family history screening: use of the three generation pedigree in clinical practice.
Next Document:  The Acceptability of HPV Vaccination Among Women Attending the University of Saskatchewan Student He...