Document Detail

National trends and practices in breast MRI.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18647898     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to report on the current practices of radiologists involved in the performance and interpretation of breast MRI in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We invited the 1,696 active physician members of the Society of Breast Imaging to participate in a survey addressing whether and how they performed and interpreted breast MRI. Respondents were asked to select one member of their practice to complete the survey. A total of 754 surveys were completed. Every respondent did not reply to every question. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced breast MRI was offered at 557 of 754 (73.8%) practices. Of these, 346 of 553 (62.6%) performed at least five breast MRI examinations per week, and only 56 of 553 (10.1%) performed > 20 per week. Radiologists qualified under the Mammography Quality Standards Act supervised the performance of and interpreted breast MRI in the majority of facilities. Of 552 respondents, breast MRI was interpreted as soft copy with computer-aided detection (CAD) in 280 practices (50.7%), as soft copy without CAD in 261 (47.3%), and as hard copy in 11 (2.0%). Of 551 respondents, 256 (46.5%) never and 207 (37.6%) rarely interpreted breast MRI without correlating mammography or sonography findings. The majority of respondents never (269/561, 48.0%) or rarely (165/561, 29.4%) interpreted breast MRI performed at an outside facility. Screening breast MRI was offered at 359 of 561 (64.0%) practices. Of the practices performing contrast-enhanced examinations, 173 of 557 (31.1%) did not perform MRI-guided interventional procedures. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced breast MRI is now widely used in the United States. The information gained from this survey should provide reasonable approaches for the development of professional practice guidelines.
Lawrence W Bassett; Sonia G Dhaliwal; Jilbert Eradat; Omer Khan; Dionne F Farria; R James Brenner; James W Sayre
Related Documents :
16425198 - In vivo magnetic resonance volumetric and spectroscopic analysis of mouse prostate canc...
17009848 - Choline phospholipid metabolism in cancer: consequences for molecular pharmaceutical in...
12459708 - 3d imaging of intraductal spread of breast cancer and its clinical application for navi...
17664638 - A method for analyzing electrical impedance spectroscopy data from breast cancer patients.
9638498 - Papillomavirus and anal carcinoma.
24434718 - Lamp3 is involved in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells through the modulation...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  191     ISSN:  1546-3141     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  2008 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-07-23     Completed Date:  2008-08-26     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  332-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Rm. 165-47, Box 956952, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
Contrast Media
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / trends*
Physician's Practice Patterns / statistics & numerical data*
United States
Grant Support
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Contrast Media

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Design, implementation, and assessment of a radiology workflow management system.
Next Document:  Comparison of fetal biometric values with sonographic and 3D reconstruction MRI in term gestations.