Document Detail

Nasal leech infestation causing persistent epistaxis.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21887037     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Foreign bodies in the nasal cavity are commonly encountered as a cause of epistaxis; however, nasal leech infestation as a cause of unilateral persistent epistaxis is very rare. Examination of nasal cavity revealed fleshy material in the left nostril, which was identified as leech. The leech was removed with the help of an artery forceps following irrigation of the left nostril with normal saline and adopting wait-and-watch policy. In developing countries, leech infestation as a cause of epistaxis should be suspected in patients with lower socioeconomic status or in those living in rural areas who give history of drinking polluted water from, or bathing in, stagnant ponds and puddles.
Authors:
Kalra Sarathi
Related Documents :
23323077 - Anatomy of atrioventricular node artery and pattern of dominancy in normal coronary sub...
23407877 - Prevalence of congenital coronary artery anomalies of korean men detected by coronary c...
24167807 - Microsurgical extraction of a malfunctioned pipeline embolization device following comp...
24387157 - Determinants of arterial stiffness in copd.
9142707 - Balloon atrial septostomy under two-dimensional echocardiographic control: a new outlook.
22723617 - Extended replacement of the thoracic aorta.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock     Volume:  4     ISSN:  0974-519X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Emerg Trauma Shock     Publication Date:  2011 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-09-02     Completed Date:  2011-11-10     Revised Date:  2013-05-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101493921     Medline TA:  J Emerg Trauma Shock     Country:  India    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  413-4     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Emerg Trauma Shock
Journal ID (publisher-id): JETS
ISSN: 0974-2700
ISSN: 0974-519X
Publisher: Medknow Publications, India
Article Information
Copyright: © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
open-access:
Received Day: 28 Month: 11 Year: 2010
Accepted Day: 15 Month: 12 Year: 2010
Print publication date: Season: Jul-Sep Year: 2011
Volume: 4 Issue: 3
First Page: 413 Last Page: 414
ID: 3162716
PubMed Id: 21887037
Publisher Id: JETS-4-413
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.83875

Nasal leech infestation causing persistent epistaxis
Kalra Sarathiaff1
B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
Correspondence: Address for correspondence: Dr. Sarathi Kalra, E-mail: sarathikalra@gmail.com

INTRODUCTION

Foreign bodies constitute an uncommon cause of unilateral epistaxis in children. Various inanimate and animate foreign bodies have been commonly found; however, nasal leech infestation as a cause of epistaxis is very uncommon, and only a few cases have been reported till date. Leech endoparasitism is extremely rare in urban areas but is frequent in endemic rural areas.[1] Leech infestation has also been reported to result in severe anemia requiring blood transfusion.[2] Sometimes patients with nasal leech infestation may have persistent epistaxis which may be difficult to control. One such case presenting with persistent epistaxis is reported below.


CASE REPORT

A 7-year-old girl presented to the emergency room at the rural health center with history of nasal stuffiness for 4 weeks along with history of persistent bleeding from the left nostril for 3 days which frequently soaked her handkerchief in the form of small drops. She gave history of marked irritation in the left nostril, associated with difficulty in breathing when right nostril was occluded. She complained of having a sensation of a moving object in the left nostril and was repeatedly picking her left nostril. She had been prescribed xylometazoline nasal drops and oral pseudoephedrine; however, these did not result in improvement. She did not give history of inserting any foreign body in the nostril, fever, runny nose or similar episodes of epistaxis in the past. Physical examination revealed that the child was in agony and was crying with pain. Her pulse rate was 96/min and blood pressure was 126/74 mm Hg. She had pallor, and fresh blood was persistently oozing from the left nostril. Local pressure did not help in controlling the epistaxis.

Examination of the nasal cavity revealed a soft fleshy material bulging into the left nostril close to the inferior turbinate. Attempt was made to pull it out with the help of an artery forceps; however, being a slimy structure, it repeatedly slipped from the grip of artery forceps and appeared to be tightly stuck to the inferior turbinate. After making a few attempts, the lower part of this fleshy material could be disentangled, and it was found to be moving. At this stage, it was identified as leech infesting the left nostril. Since repeated attempts to dislodge the leech by artery forceps failed, irrigation of the left nostril with normal saline was done and it was decided to wait and watch. After a few minutes, it could be easily dislodged with the help of artery forceps. The leech was still alive and was 8 cm long [Figure 1]. After a few minutes, the bleeding from the left nostril also decreased. Left nostril was packed with gauze piece. The child was given oral decongestant tablets, oral amoxicillin and intramuscular tetanus toxoid. Hematological investigations revealed hemoglobin to be 7.6 g/dL; and total leukocyte count, 9,800/mm3. Examination of external auditory canal did not reveal any evidence of leech infestation. After the procedure, she informed that she belonged to a very low socioeconomic stratum of society and had no access to safe drinking water and had to drink polluted water from an open pond and also take bath in it. Nasal packing was removed the next day, and the child became completely asymptomatic. She was advised not to take bath in polluted stagnant ponds or drink water from the open ponds. She was also advised to report immediately to the emergency department if similar complaints arose.


DISCUSSION

Orificial hirudiniasis is a condition in which a leech enters the body orifices, most often the nasopharyngeal region; however, some cases of leeches infesting the urethra, vagina, rectum or even eyes have been reported. Leeches are blood-sucking hermaphroditic parasites that attach themselves to the vertebrate hosts, bite through the skin and suck out blood. Common species that infest humans are Dinobdella ferox, Hirudinea granulosa and Hirundinea viridis. Both aquatic and land leeches are known to attack humans. Leeches have gained fearsome reputation by feeding externally on blood, often from human hosts. Infestation occurs by drinking infested water from, or taking bath in, stagnant streams, pools and springs.

Leech infestation may cause serious complications like airway obstruction, severe respiratory distress, hemoptysis or hematemesis.[3] Leeches attach to the tissue by two muscular suckers, use three teeth inside their anterior sucker for biting and blood is sucked into stomach by peristalsis. Leeches can ingest large amounts of blood into their stomach, which may weigh 8 to 9 times their body weight, and may cause severe anemia in the host.[4] Because leech bites are painless, infestation may remain symptomless until a warning sign appears. Epistaxis, nasal obstruction and sensation of a moving foreign body are common presenting complaints of leech infestation in the nose. The saliva of leech contains hirudin, which inhibits thrombin in the clotting process; and histamine-like substances cause continuous bleeding by causing vasodilatation.

Leech infestation primarily occurs in tropical areas such as Mediterranean countries, Africa and Asia.[1] Cases of nasal leech infestation have been reported from various parts of India,[5] Pakistan[6] and Nepal.[7] Direct removal of leech might be difficult because of its powerful attachment to the nasal mucosa and its slimy and mobile body.[8] Various innovative techniques have been used for treatment of nasal leech infestation. These include a) anterior rhinoscopy along with suction; and b) wait-and-watch policy — water is taken in a kidney tray and placed with water level 1 cm below nasal vestibule. In a comparative study of these two methods of treatment of nasal leech infestation, the method involving a wait-and-watch policy was found to be a better technique.[7] As soon as leech is seen coming out from the nasal vestibule towards the water, it is caught with artery forceps and gently pulled out. The removal is faster with the former technique; however, it is associated with more bleeding and pain. The method involving a wait-and-watch policy is a better technique and causes less pain and less blood loss, but it is more time consuming. Besides this, various substances can be used to tranquilize leech before removal. Irrigation with strong saline, vinegar, turpentine oil or alcohol may be used for removal of leech.[9] It can also be detached by applying 30% cocaine, 1:10,000 adrenaline or dimethyl phthalate.[10]


CONCLUSION

Leech endoparasitism as a cause of nasal stuffiness and epistaxis is very rare. Due to the presence of anticoagulant in the saliva of leech, bleeding may be persistent. Because the nasal cavity is not readily visualized, rhinoscopy is generally required for diagnosis; however, it may not be possible in an emergency setup, as in our case. Hence high index of suspicion is required in a patient presenting with unilateral epistaxis who gives history of drinking polluted water from, or bathing in, ponds and puddles.


Notes

Source of Support: Nil.

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES
1. Uygur K,Yasan H,Yavuz L,Dogru H. Removal of a laryngeal leech: A safe and effective methodAm J OtolaryngolYear: 2003243384013130448
2. White GB. Cook GCLeeches and leech infestationManson's Tropical DiseasesYear: 199820th edLondonSaunders15235
3. Singh M,Naim AF. Respiratory obstruction and haematemesis due to leechLancetYear: 19792137492719
4. Al-Hadrani,Debry C,Faucon F,Fingerhut A. Hoarseness due to leech ingestionJ Laryngol OtolYear: 200014145610748835
5. Satyawati,Singhal SK,Dass A. Multiple live leeches from nose in a single patient – A rare entityIndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgYear: 2002541545
6. Khan NU,Akhtar M,Chohan MA,Ahmed T,Azim W. Leech in the hypopharynx: An unusual cause of bleeding from throatBiomedicaYear: 2004201279
7. Adhikari P. Nasal leech infestation in children: Comparison of two different innovative techniquesInt J Pediatr OtorhinolaryngolYear: 200973853519395059
8. Pandey CK,Sharma R,Baronia A,Agrawal A,Singh N. An unusual cause of respiratory distress: Live leech in the larynxAnesth AnalgYear: 2000901227810781486
9. Bilgen C,Karci B,Uloz U. A nasopharyngeal mass: Leech in the nesopharynxInt J Pediatr OtorhinolaryngolYear: 20026473612020918
10. El-Award ME,Patik K. Haematemesis due to leech infestationAnn Trop PaediatrYear: 1990106121694646

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

The leech after removal from the nasal cavity



Article Categories:
  • Case Report

Keywords: Epistaxis, foreign body, leech, nose.

Previous Document:  Bitemporal compression injury to the head.
Next Document:  Management of paroxysmal hypertension due to incidental pheochromocytoma in pregnancy.