Document Detail


Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11869635     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Apnea of prematurity is almost universal in infants who are born before 34 weeks gestation. Previous randomised trials and systematic reviews have found methylxanthines to be effective in preventing apnea of prematurity. However, recent concerns about potential long term side effects of methylxanthines on the neurodevelopment of low birth weight infants have led to an increased interest in alternate methods of treating apnea of prematurity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a useful method of respiratory support which reduces the incidence of obstructive or mixed apnea. However, apneic infants managed with NCPAP, with or without methylxanthines, sometimes require endotracheal intubation with its attendant morbidity and cost. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a simple, effective mode of respiratory support for older children and adults. It has been used to treat apnea in preterm infants but case reports of gastrointestinal perforations have limited its widespread use.
OBJECTIVES: In preterm infants with recurrent apnea, does treatment with NIPPV lead to a greater reduction in apnea and need for intubation and mechanical ventilation, as compared with treatment with NCPAP? Does NIPPV increase the incidence of gastrointestinal complications, i.e. gastric distension leading to cessation of feeds, or perforation?
SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE was searched (1966-Oct week 2, 2001). Other sources included the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Disk Issue 3, 2001) and CINAHL (1982-Sept week 4, 2001). Also used were expert informants, previous reviews including cross-references, and conference and symposia proceedings.
SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised trials were included. Participants included unventilated preterm infants experiencing apnea of prematurity. Interventions compared were intermittent positive pressure ventilation administered via the nasal route, either by short nasal prongs or nasopharyngeal tube, and nasal CPAP delivered by the same methods. Types of outcome measures: - failure of therapy as defined by apnea that is frequent or severe requiring additional ventilatory support - rates of endotracheal intubation - rates of apnea and bradycardia expressed as events per hour - gastrointestinal complications i.e. abdominal distension requiring cessation of feeds, or GI perforation
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by the three reviewers. The trials were analysed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) for dichotomous data; means and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used for continuous data.
MAIN RESULTS: Two trials, enrolling 54 infants in total, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Both reported only the short term results (4 to 6 hours) of the interventions. Only one infant (randomised to NCPAP) required intubation during this period. Ryan (1989), in a cross over study of 20 infants, showed no significant difference in rates of apnea (events/hr) between the 2 interventions [WMD -0.10 (-0.53,0.33)]. Lin (1998) randomised 34 infants and demonstrated a greater reduction in frequency of apneas (events/hr) with NIPPV compared to NCPAP [WMD -1.19 (-2.31,-0.07)]. Meta-analysis of both trials showed no difference in pCO2 (mmHg) at the end of the 4-6 hour study period [WMD 0.95 (-3.05,4.94)]. No data were reported on gastrointestinal complications.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS:
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: NIPPV may be a useful method of augmenting the beneficial effects of NCPAP in preterm infants with apnea that is frequent or severe. Its use appears to reduce the frequency of apneas more effectively than NCPAP. Additional safety and efficacy data are required before recommending NIPPV as standard therapy for apnea.
IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Future trials with sufficient power should assess the efficacy (reduction in failure of therapy) and safety (GI complications) of NIPPV. Outcomes should be assessed throughout the entire period during which the infant requires assisted ventilation. The recent ability to synchronise NIPPV with an infant's spontaneous respirations is a promising development requiring further assessment.
Authors:
B Lemyre; P G Davis; A G de Paoli
Related Documents :
21949135 - Infant growth before and after term: effects on neurodevelopment in preterm infants.
9346985 - Infant arousals during mother-infant bed sharing: implications for infant sleep and sud...
20607645 - Swallow-breath interaction and phase of respiration with swallow during nonnutritive su...
16490005 - Bladder voiding in sleeping infants is consistently accompanied by a cortical arousal.
998325 - Season of birth among siblings of schizophrenics. a test of the parental conception hab...
24117765 - Premature infants with birth weights of 1,500-1,999 grams exhibit considerable delays i...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2002  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-02-28     Completed Date:  2002-05-28     Revised Date:  2014-07-28    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD002272     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Apnea / therapy*
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infant, Premature, Diseases / therapy*
Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation
Positive-Pressure Respiration / methods*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recurrence
Xanthines / therapeutic use
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Xanthines
Comments/Corrections
Update Of:
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD002272   [PMID:  10908544 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Next Document:  Fluticasone versus beclomethasone or budesonide for chronic asthma.