Document Detail


NASS Contemporary Concepts in Spine Care: spinal manipulation therapy for acute low back pain.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20869008     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Low back pain (LBP) continues to be a very prevalent, disabling, and costly spinal disorder. Numerous interventions are routinely used for symptoms of acute LBP. One of the most common approaches is spinal manipulation therapy (SMT).
PURPOSE: To assess the current scientific literature related to SMT for acute LBP.
PATIENT SAMPLE: Not applicable.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable.
DESIGN: Systematic review (SR).
METHODS: Literature was identified by searching MEDLINE using indexed and free text terms. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English, and SMT was administered to a group of patients with LBP of less than 3 months. RCTs included in two previous SRs were also screened, as were reference lists of included studies. Combined search results were screened for relevance by two reviewers. Data related to methods, risk of bias, harms, and results were abstracted independently by two reviewers.
RESULTS: The MEDLINE search returned 699 studies, of which six were included; an additional eight studies were identified from two previous SRs. There were 2,027 participants in the 14 included RCTs, which combined SMT with education (n=5), mobilization (MOB) (n=4), exercise (n=3), modalities (n=3), or medication (n=2). The groups that received SMT were most commonly compared with those receiving physical modalities (n=7), education (n=6), medication (n=5), exercise (n=5), MOB (n=3), or sham SMT (n=2). The most common providers of SMT were chiropractors (n=5) and physical therapists (n=5). Most studies (n=6) administered 5 to 10 sessions of SMT over 2 to 4 weeks for acute LBP. Outcomes measured included pain (n=10), function (n=10), health-care utilization (n=6), and global effect (n=5). Studies had a follow-up of less than 1 month (n=7), 3 months (n=1), 6 months (n=3), 1 year (n=2), or 2 years (n=1). When compared with various control groups, results for improvement in pain in the SMT groups were superior in three RCTs and equivalent in three RCTs in the short term, equivalent in four RCTs in the intermediate term, and equivalent in two RCTs in the long term. For improvement in function, results from the SMT groups were superior in one RCT and equivalent in four RCTs in the short term, superior in one RCT and equivalent in one RCT in the intermediate term, and equivalent in one RCT and inferior in one RCT in the long term. No harms related to SMT were reported in these RCTs.
CONCLUSIONS: Several RCTs have been conducted to assess the efficacy of SMT for acute LBP using various methods. Results from most studies suggest that 5 to 10 sessions of SMT administered over 2 to 4 weeks achieve equivalent or superior improvement in pain and function when compared with other commonly used interventions, such as physical modalities, medication, education, or exercise, for short, intermediate, and long-term follow-up. Spine care clinicians should discuss the role of SMT as a treatment option for patients with acute LBP who do not find adequate symptomatic relief with self-care and education alone.
Authors:
Simon Dagenais; Ralph E Gay; Andrea C Tricco; Michael D Freeman; John M Mayer
Related Documents :
18347278 - Efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor vii in major surgical procedures: s...
20577288 - Surgical or nonsurgical treatment for teeth with existing root filings?
12911238 - Systematic review of treatment strategies for osteochondral defects of the talar dome.
18646138 - Decompressive surgery of lower limbs for symmetrical diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
23096128 - In vivo study of hydroxyapatite-coated hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage com...
11792238 - Endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society     Volume:  10     ISSN:  1878-1632     ISO Abbreviation:  Spine J     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-27     Completed Date:  2011-01-25     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101130732     Medline TA:  Spine J     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  918-40     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Palladian Health, 2732 Transit Rd, West Seneca, NY 14224, USA. simon@spine-research.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Humans
Low Back Pain / therapy*
Manipulation, Spinal / methods*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Morphological traits in sacra associated with complete and partial lumbarization of first sacral seg...
Next Document:  A descriptive statistical approach to the Korean pharmacopuncture therapy.