| Multipractice studies: how representative are the participating doctors? | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 7441623 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
General practitioners participating in a multipractice study were compared with those who refused to participate. We found that younger doctors, doctors in partnerships, and doctors with many patients were represented more among participants. However, no correlation was found between the number of patients examined for urinary tract infection in connection with the study. |
| | |
Authors:
|
C E Mabeck; R Vejlsgaard |
Related Documents
:
|
15523463 - Otorhinolaryngology or otolaryngology? an etymological approach. 21110173 - A preliminary study on the medical expenditure of chinese medicine and integrative medi... 22709813 - Identifying components of advanced-level clinical nutrition practice: a delphi study. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners Volume: 30 ISSN: 0035-8797 ISO Abbreviation: J R Coll Gen Pract Publication Date: 1980 May |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 1981-02-19 Completed Date: 1981-02-19 Revised Date: 2010-06-22 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 7503107 Medline TA: J R Coll Gen Pract Country: ENGLAND |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 285-7 Citation Subset: IM |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Data Collection
/
methods* Family Practice* Health Surveys |
| Comments/Corrections | |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Multipractice studies: significance of the information given to participating doctors.
Next Document: Self-poisoning: changing patterns in East Cheshire, 1970-1975.