Document Detail


Moral distress related to ethical dilemmas among Spanish podiatrists.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20448007     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To describe the distress experienced by Spanish podiatrists related to ethical dilemmas, organisational matters, and lack of resources. DESIGN: A 2008 email survey of a representative sample of 485 Spanish podiatrists presenting statements about different ethical dilemmas, values and goals at the workplace. RESULTS: The response rate was 44.8%. Of all the respondents, 57% described sometimes having to act against their own conscience as distressing. Time constraints is the main cause of moral distress (67%) and 58% of respondents said that they found it distressing that patients have long waits for treatment. Distress related to inadequate treatment due to economical constraints or ineffectiveness was described by 60% of the podiatrists. Another 51% reported that time spent on administration and documentation is distressing. Female doctors experienced more distress than their male colleagues. Last, 36% of respondents reported that their workplace lacked strategies for dealing with ethical dilemmas. CONCLUSION: These study results identify moral distress among Spanish podiatrists mainly related to time constraints, patient demands and lack of resources. Moral distress varies with sex and age. Organisational strategies such as moral deliberation and responsive evaluation offer the potential to address moral distress.
Authors:
Marta Elena Losa Iglesias; Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo; Paloma Salvadores Fuentes
Related Documents :
16506997 - Vulnerability, violence and (cosmopolitan) ethics: butler's precarious life.
3674207 - Moving forward with deinstitutionalization: lessons of an ethical policy analysis.
11216427 - Study on the ethical concepts of the japanese writer yukio mishima, ultra-nationalist.
17761817 - A dynamic model of ethical reasoning in speech pathology.
19474007 - Writing a new code of ethics for sports physicians: principles and challenges.
20653467 - Novel drugs to treat hemophilia.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical ethics     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1473-4257     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Ethics     Publication Date:  2010 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-07     Completed Date:  2010-08-18     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513619     Medline TA:  J Med Ethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  310-4     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain. marta.losa@urjc.es
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Bioethical Issues
Delivery of Health Care / ethics
Ethics, Medical*
Female
Goals
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Moral Obligations*
Podiatry / ethics*
Questionnaires
Spain
Stress, Psychological / etiology*
Workplace

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of pat...
Next Document:  Forensic DNA databases: genetic testing as a societal choice.