Document Detail


Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21279419     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Steady-state VEPs to full-field flicker (FFF) using sinusoidally modulated light were compared with those elicited by square-wave modulated light across a wide range of stimulus frequencies with monocular and binocular FFF stimulation. Binocular and monocular VEPs were elicited in 12 adult volunteers to FFF with two modes of temporal modulation: sinusoidal or square-wave (abrupt onset and offset, 50% duty cycle) at ten temporal frequencies ranging from 2.83 to 58.8 Hz. All stimuli had a mean luminance of 100 cd/m(2) with an 80% modulation depth (20-180 cd/m(2)). Response magnitudes at the stimulus frequency (F1) and at the double and triple harmonics (F2 and F3) were compared. For both sinusoidal and square-wave flicker, the FFF-VEP magnitudes at F1 were maximal for 7.52 Hz flicker. F2 was maximal for 5.29 Hz flicker, and F3 magnitudes are largest for flicker stimulation from 3.75 to 7.52 Hz. Square-wave flicker produced significantly larger F1 and F2 magnitudes for slow flicker rates (up to 5.29 Hz for F1; at 2.83 and 3.75 Hz for F2). The F3 magnitudes were larger overall for square-wave flicker. Binocular FFF-VEP magnitudes are larger than those of monocular FFF-VEPs, and the amount of this binocular enhancement is not dependant on the mode of flicker stimulation (mean binocular: monocular ratio 1.41, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6). Binocular enhancement of F1 for 21.3 Hz flicker was increased to a factor of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.8-3.5). In the healthy adult visual system, FFF-VEP magnitudes can be characterized by the frequency-response functions of F1, F2 and F3. Low-frequency roll-off in the FFF-VEP magnitudes is greater for sinusoidal flicker than for square-wave flicker for rates ≤5.29 Hz; magnitudes for higher-frequency flicker are similar for the two types of flicker. Binocular FFF-VEPs are larger overall than those recorded monocularly, and this binocular summation is enhanced at 21.3 Hz in the mid-frequency range.
Authors:
David S Nicol; Ruth Hamilton; Uma Shahani; Daphne L McCulloch
Related Documents :
20548629 - Pupillary response: an index of visual threshold.
7108039 - A technique for detecting the ipsilateral acoustic reflex.
21287039 - Phenomenal background frequency and the concreteness/imagery effect in verbal discrimin...
6281829 - Effects of stimulus and task factors on achilles tendon reflexes evoked early during a ...
8724909 - Inhibition of the soleus h-reflex during dorsiflexion is dependent on individual differ...
21464979 - Vibration influences haptic perception of surface compliance during walking.
22123449 - Fundamentals of phototherapy for neonatal jaundice.
379089 - Physiological control of sibilant duration: insights afforded by speech compensation to...
20514339 - Chasing behavior and optomotor following in free-flying male blowflies: flight performa...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-1-29
Journal Detail:
Title:  Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1573-2622     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-1-31     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370667     Medline TA:  Doc Ophthalmol     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G12 0RQ, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The repeatability of the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer for measuring cone adaptation.
Next Document:  Development and characterization of wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica partial amphiploids for resista...