| Minimizing bias in clinical peer review. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22195417 Owner: NLM Status: In-Process |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
The chief sources of bias in peer review include the clinical outcome and the reviewer. But there are ways to mitigate any bias. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Marc T Edwards |
Related Documents
:
|
21945987 - St theresa's dart and a case of religious ecstatic epilepsy. 21702397 - Spice: a legal marijuana equivalent. 22147097 - Panhypopituitarism due to wegener's granulomatosis. 21597437 - Ejprm systematic continuous update on cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: news from feb... 3731667 - Neonatal mastitis. 19201287 - A devastating outcome after adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy: ideas for improved prevent... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Physician executive Volume: 37 ISSN: 0898-2759 ISO Abbreviation: Physician Exec Publication Date: 2011 Nov-Dec |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-12-26 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8610398 Medline TA: Physician Exec Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 50-2, 54 Citation Subset: H |
Affiliation:
|
Wilson-Edwards Consulting, West Hartford, CT, USA. marc@wilson-edwards.com |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Pathology and genetics of meningiomas.
Next Document: A stochastic stormwater quality volume-sizing method with first flush emphasis.