|Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22294057 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is one of the approaches used worldwide for treating esophageal cancer. Optimization of this approach and especially identifying the ideal intrathoracic anastomosis technique is needed. To date, different types of anastomosis have been described. A literature search on the current techniques and approaches for intrathoracic anastomosis was held. The studies were evaluated on leakage and stenosis rate of the anastomosis.
METHODS: The PubMed electronic database was used for comprehensive literature search by two independent reviewers.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this review. The most frequent applied technique was the stapled anastomosis. Stapled anastomoses can be divided into a transthoracic or a transoral introduction. This stapled approach can be performed with a circular or linear stapler. The reported anastomotic leakage rate ranges from 0 to 10%. The reported anastomotic stenosis rate ranges from 0 to 27.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: This review has found no important differences between the two most frequently used stapled anastomoses: the transoral introduction of the anvil and the transthoracic. Clinical trials are needed to compare different methods to improve the quality of the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy.
|K W Maas; S S A Y Biere; J J G Scheepers; S S Gisbertz; V Turrado Turrado Rodriguez; D L van der Peet; M A Cuesta|
Related Documents :
|22470647 - Geniculate arterial pseudoaneurysm formation following trauma and elective orthopaedic ...
22834977 - Chemistry and biology of the genus voacanga.
16844897 - Onset of schizophrenia at age 100.
22816667 - Autoimmune hepatitis type 2 associated with an unexpected and transient presence of pri...
16983037 - Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: are they prev...
16490147 - Public health implications of a case of haemolytic-uraemic syndrome associated with a c...
|Type: Journal Article; Review Date: 2012-02-01|
|Title: Surgical endoscopy Volume: 26 ISSN: 1432-2218 ISO Abbreviation: Surg Endosc Publication Date: 2012 Jul|
|Created Date: 2012-08-06 Completed Date: 2012-09-21 Revised Date: 2013-04-01|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 8806653 Medline TA: Surg Endosc Country: Germany|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 1795-802 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Anastomotic Leak / etiology
Constriction, Pathologic / etiology
Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery*
Esophagectomy / instrumentation, methods*
Laparoscopy / instrumentation, methods*
Surgical Stapling / instrumentation*
Thoracoscopy / instrumentation, methods*
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Surg Endosc
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Surg Endosc
Publisher: Springer-Verlag, New York
© The Author(s) 2012
Received Day: 23 Month: 5 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 20 Month: 12 Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 1 Month: 2 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 1 Month: 2 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 7 Year: 2012
Volume: 26 Issue: 7
First Page: 1795 Last Page: 1802
PubMed Id: 22294057
Publisher Id: 2149
|Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers|
|K. W. MaasAff1|
|S. S. A. Y. BiereAff1|
|J. J. G. ScheepersAff1|
|S. S. GisbertzAff1|
|V. Turrado RodriguezAff1|
|D. L. van der PeetAff1|
|M. A. CuestaAff1||
|Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Despite the important development of the minimally invasive approach of esophageal cancer, esophagectomy is still associated with a significant risk of perioperative morbidity . After a successfully performed esophageal resection, the creation of a safe anastomosis is essential to reduce the risk of leakage and related complications.
There is an important trend to anastomose the gastric tube with the intrathoracic esophagus, the so-called Ivor Lewis operation . Risk for anastomotic leakage in the thorax with possibly fatal consequences has resulted in the development of the three-stage approach with a cervical anastomosis by McKeown , and the transhiatal approach with a cervical anastomosis by Orringer and Sloan . In case of anastomotic leakage in the neck, a subsequent cervical fistula is a manageable complication . There is, however, some evidence that cervical anastomosis could be related to more anastomotic leakage and stenosis . Currently, the increased numbers of gastroesophageal junction tumors form an ideal indication for an Ivor Lewis procedure. This approach may reduce recurrent nerve lesion and other complications associated with a cervical dissection. Moreover, a shorter gastric conduit will permit a more extended gastric resection and will, because of a good vascular supply, lead to less anastomotic leakages. This transthoracic procedure may be performed by a conventional or minimally invasive approach.
The question is which type of intrathoracic anastomosis is the ideal. According to the review of Blackmon et al. , stapled anastomosis in conventional surgery will have less leakages and stenosis than the manual anastomosis.
In this paper, all different techniques used for intrathoracic anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy have been reviewed showing small differences concerning leakages and stenosis. Due to the increased implementation of the use of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal resection and the number of distal adenocarcinomas and gastroesophageal junction tumors, the ideal anastomosis has still to be found.
The PubMed electronic database was used for literature search. A comprehensive search was performed using the following terms: esophagus, esophagectomy, anastomosis, intrathoracic, cancer, Ivor Lewis, minimally invasive, MIE, laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, and esophagogastric. Related terms and combinations also were used (e.g., thoracic, esophagectomy).
Relevant titles were identified and abstracts were read to decide eligibility. When the information in the title and abstract met the objectives of this review, the full article was read. A manual cross-reference search of the references of the relevant articles was performed to identify studies beside the computerized search. Furthermore, the “related articles” feature of PubMed was used. Two reviewers (KWM and SSAYB) executed the search independently of each other.
Intrathoracic anastomoses can be accomplished by a handsewn or stapler technique (Fig. 1). Twelve studies were included in this review to analyze the different techniques. Tables 1 and 2 depict the study characteristics, anastomotic outcomes, and complications. The reported anastomotic leakage rate ranges from 0 to 10% and the anastomotic stenosis from 0 to 27.5%, showing no differences between the type of anastomosis. Compared with the open Ivor Lewis operation, the range of complications were 0–4% for anastomotic leakage and 14.3–28.6% for anastomotic stenosis [8, 9].
The first description of a totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis was reported in 1999 by Watson et al. . The thoracoscopic phase of the operation was performed in the prone position. They described two patients in which the intrathoracic anastomosis was achieved with a handsewn single-layer technique. Both patients recovered without complications and with a short hospital stay.
Ten years later, Cadiere et al.  described a totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with handsewn anastomosis. The patient was operated through right thoracoscopy in the prone position and laparoscopy. No postoperative complications were reported in this case report. An illustration of the handsewn intrathoracic anastomosis technique is shown in Fig. 2.
In 1997, Lee et al.  described a one-stage right lateral thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic stapled anastomosis in a series of eight patients with carcinoma of the lower esophagus. The operation was performed with a double-lumen tracheal tube to enable collapse of the right lung. The patient was placed in 45 position with the right side up. A two-team synchronous approach was used: one for the abdominal stage to perform the mobilization of the stomach through a transverse incision laparotomy, and the other team performed the thoracoscopic approach. Esophagogastric anastomosis was fashioned by a stapling device using the ligature method described by Allsop and Ng [13, 14]. A right-angled clamp inserted by the abdominal surgeon through the hiatus was applied onto the esophagus just proximal to the lesion. A transverse incision in the esophagus was placed, with adequate margin, above the tumor. The abdominal surgeon inserted the anvil (28-mm circular stapler) into the thoracic cavity through the hiatus and introduced it into the lumen of the esophagus. A Vicryl ligature was applied around the esophagus by means of Roeder’s knot to fix the anvil in the proper position and the esophagus divided as illustrated in Fig. 3. The cardioesophageal junction was transacted with a GIA linear stapler and through a transverse gastrostomy the circular stapler was inserted, the stomach introduced into the thorax, and the anastomosis performed. The operation was successful in seven patients, and the remaining patient required conversion to thoracotomy. No leakages were recorded. On short term, one patient developed a benign stenosis that required dilatation.
The anastomosis technique described by Nguyen et al. in 2001  in a case report was performed through a right lateral thoracoscopy with lung block. After the laparoscopic phase, the esophagus was dissected by thoracoscopy and divided with the stapler 2 cm below the azygos vein. The esophageal specimen was retrieved through an enlarged (4 cm) posterior trocar site. Using this small incision, the anvil of 21- or 25-mm circular stapler was placed into the chest and inserted through the opening of the esophagus and secured with a handsewn pursestring suture. The circular stapler was introduced into the chest and passed through an anterior gastrostomy of the gastric conduit. A stapled end-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis was made. Most of the techniques described for circular stapled anastomosis are similar to this technique .
During the next years, new techniques have been described to facilitate the placement of the anvil in the proximal esophagus. Misawa et al.  approached the esophagus, after the laparoscopic phase, through a lateral right thoracoscopy in five patients with cancer of the middle and lower thoracic esophagus. A 5-cm-long thoracotomy was made on the fifth intercostal space. After mobilization of the esophagus, the level of transection was decided and the distal esophagus tied with a 2-0 ligature. The esophageal wall was anteriorly opened and two clamps grasped the esophageal edges allowing the Endo-Stitch® (US Surgical) device for achieving a pursestring suture. After this, the anvil of a 25-mm circular stapler was introduced into the proximal esophagus and the pursestring tied. An Endoloop® ligature was placed over the pursestring to reinforce it (Fig. 4). After retrieval of the distal esophagus with the lesion, the proximal end of the gastric tube was pulled out of the minithoracotomy and the circular stapler was introduced through it into a gastrostomy incision. No leakage or other postoperative complications were observed after this procedure.
Bizekis et al.  reported their experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in 50 patients, the majority with tumors with extension into the cardia or a gastroesophageal junction tumor. Thirty-five patients underwent a hybrid Ivor Lewis procedure, defined as laparoscopic gastric mobilization combined with a 5-cm minithoracotomy, and the other 15 underwent the total minimally invasive approach. In the total minimally invasive procedure, after mobilization the esophagus was transacted 2–3 cm above the azygos vein, and an inferior intercostal port site was enlarged to allow the introduction of the circular stapler and for retrieval of the specimen. A 25-mm anvil was placed into the proximal esophagus and secured by means of a pursestring suture (Endo-stitch, US Surgical). The stapler was introduced into the gastric conduit and a circular anastomosis was created in a side-to-end fashion. The redundant gastric conduit was removed by using a linear stapler. In the hybrid procedure, after the laparoscopic phase, the patient was placed in the lateral position and a 5-cm minithoracotomy performed. A rib retractor was placed and the thoracic esophagus mobilized under direct vision. A stapled esophagogastric anastomosis was created in the same fashion. There were three anastomotic leaks in the hybrid group: one empyema not related to leak, one chylothorax, and one pulmonary embolism. They observed 6% mortality. Moreover, six patients developed stenosis of the anastomosis, being dilated postoperatively.
To obviate the necessity of the placement of a pursestring suture or a manually tied knot to secure the anvil, Thairu et al.  described a technique in which the head of the anvil was inserted through the anterior wall of the esophagus, opened with dissecting scissors. A linear staple was fired at 60° to the longitudinal axis first right and after left to the spike of the anvil thus forming a V. Around this aperture a Z-stitch was placed, which secured the anvil in place, followed by an end-to-side anastomosis. Using this technique in 18 patients, they observed no anastomotic leaks postoperatively. No midterm results were reported (e.g., stenosis).
An important development is the introduction of the anvil transorally into the proximal esophagus, as described originally by Wittgrove et al.  for the gastrojejunostomy construction of the gastric bypass in bariatric surgery after the initial work of Sutton et al. in 2002 using a self-adopted circular anvil system .
Nguyen et al.  described the transoral technique in a series of ten patients to perform the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection. A commercially available prepared pretilted anvil’s head tip was attached to an oral-gastric tube that was given to the anesthesiologist. The tilted configuration of the anvil improved the ease of transoral passage. After the transection of the esophagus by means of linear stapler, the tube was passed transorally until it was felt within the proximal esophageal stump. A small opening at this level was made perpendicular to the staple line and the tube was advanced through it and withdrawn until the anvil was in the right position at the end of the esophageal stump. The oral-gastric tube was removed after cutting the suture that attached it to the anvil. The head of the anvil returned to the flat position when attached to the spike of the 25-mm circular stapler to perform the anastomosis (Fig. 5). The authors applied the technique without passage problems in ten patients. Moreover, tissue donuts were complete in all cases and there were no postoperative leaks.
Campos et al.  confirmed the good results using the transoral anvil technique in 37 patients with a distal esophageal cancer. After the laparoscopic approach in 81% of the patients, the thoracic portion was performed using a muscle-sparing minithoracotomy in 23 patients (62%) and total thoracoscopic approach in 14 patients (37%). There were no intraoperative technical failures of the anastomosis or deaths. Five patients developed strictures (13.5%), and all were successfully treated with endoscopic dilatations. One patient had an anastomotic leak (2.7%) that was treated by reoperation and endoscopic stenting of the anastomosis.
Ben-David et al.  described in 2010 six patients with gastroesophageal junction cancers in whom after laparoscopic dissection and formation of the gastric conduit, the thorax was approached through a lateral right thoracoscopy. After dissection, the esophagus was divided at the level of the azygos vein using a 60-mm stapler. The transacted proximal esophagus and gastric conduit were aligned with sutures. An esophagostomy was created at the distal end of the transacted esophagus and a gastrostomy performed proximal of the end of the gastric conduit. With the aid of traction sutures, a side-to-side 6-cm linear stapled esophagogastrostomy was performed. After this, the common opening was closed with a running suture. There were no leakages of anastomosis or other postoperative complications. At a median follow-up of 9 months, no postoperative strictures were reported.
Gorenstein et al.  described a slight different side-to-side anastomosis technique in which the proximal esophagus was not stapled, and used the whole lumen for the construction of the side-to-side anastomosis by means of a linear stapler. Once a 4-cm anastomosis was constructed, the anterior defect was closed. Of the 31 patients operated on with this approach, one developed leakage that required reoperation. There were no other anastomotic complications. The side-to-side technique for stapled intrathoracic anastomosis is illustrated in Fig. 6.
Despite the new developments (e.g., minimally invasive surgery), esophagectomy for cancer is still associated with a significant risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality [1, 4]. To reduce morbidity and mortality, it is important at the end of the procedure to create a safe gastric conduit-esophageal anastomosis with low risk of leakage.
With the increase of gastroesophageal junction tumors, the Ivor Lewis type of resection with intrathoracic anastomosis is increasingly being used. A shorter gastric conduit will permit an extended gastric resection and a well-vascularized anastomosis. Moreover, minimally invasive esophageal resection is increasingly implemented with potential benefits of having less pain, less respiratory infection, and reduced intensive care unit stay, preserving the completeness of the resection. The combination of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with minimally invasive surgery has the potential to improve the postoperative outcome.
There is more interest for stapler esophageal anastomosis in literature than handsewn techniques [7, 26]. Stapled anastomosis in the thoracic cavity has been supported by Blackmon et al.  who analyzed three techniques of intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: handsewn, circular stapled, and side-to-side stapled anastomosis. In this matched analysis, no significant differences were reported concerning anastomotic leakage. However, a higher incidence of dysphagia and a fourfold higher incidence of stricture were seen after the handsewn technique. Moreover, no differences were reported for both circular stapled and side-to-side stapled methods. This study suggests a clearly superior role of the stapler technique for gastroesophageal anastomoses.
This review summarizes the different techniques used to perform a safe intrathoracic anastomosis after an Ivor Lewis thoracoscopic procedure. None of the techniques described here are found superior to the others, but stapled anastomosis offered a safe outcome with a low percentage of anastomotic leakage and stenosis. Furthermore, no important differences were found between the two most used stapled anastomoses: the transoral introduction of the anvil, and the transthoracic introduction. Clinical trials are needed to compare different methods to improve the quality of the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer.
Drs. K.W. Maas, S.S.A.Y. Biere, J.J.G. Scheepers, S.S. Gisbertz, V. Turrado Rodriguez, D.L. van der Peet, and M.A. Cuesta have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
|1..||Kent MS,Schuchert M,Fernando H,Luketich JD. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: state of the artDis EsophagusYear: 20061913714510.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00555.x16722989|
|2..||Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus: with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle thirdBr J SurgYear: 194634183110.1002/bjs.1800341330420994128|
|3..||McKeown KC. Total three-stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagusBr J SurgYear: 19766325926210.1002/bjs.18006304031276657|
|4..||Orringer MB,Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomyJ Thorac Cardiovasc SurgYear: 197876643654703369|
|5..||Scheepers JJ,Peet DL,Veenhof AA,Heijnen B,Cuesta MA. Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resectionDis EsophagusYear: 20092311712110.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00970.x19392847|
|6..||Biere SSAY,Maas KW,Cuesta MA,Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysisDig SurgYear: 201028293510.1159/00032201421293129|
|7..||Blackmon SH,Correa AM,Wynn B,Hofstetter WL,Martin LW,Mehran RJ,Rice DC,Swisher SG,Walsh GL,Roth JA,Vaporciyan AA. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosisAnn Thorac SurgYear: 2007831805181310.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.04617462404|
|8..||Chasseray VM,Kiroff GK,Buard JL,et al. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinomaSurg Gynecol ObstetYear: 1989169634640|
|9..||Walther BJ,Johansson J,Johnsson F,Holstein CS,Zilling T. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosisAnn SurgYear: 200323880381210.1097/01.sla.0000098624.04100.b114631217|
|10..||Watson DI,Davies N,Jamieson GG. Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomySurg EndoscYear: 19991329329710.1007/s00464990096910064770|
|11..||Cadiere GB,Dapri G,Himpens J,Fodderie L,Rajan A. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with manual esophago-gastric anastomosis by thoracoscopy in prone position and laparoscopySurg EndoscYear: 2010241482148510.1007/s00464-009-0777-820033716|
|12..||Lee KW,Leung KF,Wong KK,Lau KY,Lai KC,Leung LC,Lau KW. One-stage thoracoscopic oesophagectomy: ligature intrathoracic stapled anastomosisAust N Z J SurgYear: 1997672–313113210.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb01918.x9068556|
|13..||Allsop JR. Ligature versus purse string for surgical stapled anastomosesAust N Z J SurgYear: 19926274074210.1111/j.1445-2197.1992.tb07074.x1520159|
|14..||Ng WT,Lee K,Kong CK,Cheung CH,Leung LC. Ligature versus purse string for surgical stapled anastomoses [comment]Aust N Z J SurgYear: 19936365165210.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00475.x8338486|
|15..||Nguyen NT,Follette DM,Lemoine PH,Roberts PF. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomyAnn Thorac SurgYear: 20017259359610.1016/S0003-4975(00)02261-X11515902|
|16..||Nguyen NT,Longaria M,Chang K,Lee J,Wilson SE. Thoracolaparoscopic modification of the Ivor Lewis esophagectomyJ Gastrointest SurgYear: 20061045045410.1016/j.gassur.2005.03.00516504895|
|17..||Misawa K,Hachisuka T,Kuno Y,Mori T,Shinohara M,Miyauchi M. New procedure for pursestring suture in thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosisSurg EndoscYear: 200519404210.1007/s00464-004-9138-915772875|
|18..||Bizekis C,Kent MS,Luketich JD,Buenaventura PO,Landreneau RJ,Schuchert MJ,Alvelo-Rivera M. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomyAnn Thorac SurgYear: 20068240240710.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.05216863737|
|19..||Thairu N,Biswas S,Abdulaal Y,Ali H. A new method for intrathoracic anastomosis in laparoscopic esophagectomySurg EndoscYear: 2007211887189010.1007/s00464-007-9292-y17522937|
|20..||Wittgrove AC,Clark WG,Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five casesObes SurgYear: 2004435335710.1381/09608929476555833110742801|
|21..||Sutton CD,White SA,Marshall LJ,Berry DP,Veith PS. Endoscopic-assisted intrathoracic oesophagectomy without thoracotomy for tumours of the lower oesophagus and cardiaEJSOYear: 200228464811869013|
|22..||Nguyen NT,Hinojosa MW,Smith BR,Gray J,Reavis KM. Thoracoscopic construction of an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a circular stapler: transoral placement of the anvilAnn Thorac SurgYear: 20088698999310.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.03418721597|
|23..||Campos MC,Jablons D,Brown LM,Ramirez RM,Rabl C,Theodore P. A safe reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvilEur J Cardiothorac SurgYear: 2010371421142610.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.01020153660|
|24..||Ben-David K,Sarosi GA,Cendan JC,Hochwald SN. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosisJ Gastrointest SurgYear: 2010141613161810.1007/s11605-010-1244-520532663|
|25..||Gorenstein LA,Bessler M,Sonett JR. Intrathoracic stapled esophagogastric anastomosis: an alternative to the end to end anastomosisAnn Thorac SurgYear: 20119131431610.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.11521172549|
|26..||Behzadi A,Nichols FC,Cassivi SD,Deschamps C,Allen MS,Pairolero PC. Esophagectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcomeJ Gastrointest SurgYear: 200591031104210.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.02516269373|
|Study||No. patients||Surgical approach||Patients positiona||Anastomotic technique||Type of anastomosis||Layers||Fixation of anvil|
|Watson et al. (1999) ||2||Transthoracic||Prone position||Handsewn||End-to-side||Single layer||NA|
|Cadiere et al. (2010) ||1||Transthoracic||Prone position||Handsewn||Side-to-end||Two layers||NA|
|Lee et al. (1997) ||8||Transhiatal and transthoracic||45° Semilateral position||Circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||Pursestring|
|Nguyen et al. (2001) ||1||Transthoracic||Left lateral decubitus position||Circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||Handsewn pursestring|
|Misawa et al. (2005) ||5||Transthoracic||Left lateral decubitus position||Circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||Pursestring
|Bizekis et al. (2006) ||50||Transthoracic||Left lateral decubitus position||Circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||NR|
|Thairu et al. (2007) ||18||Transthoracic||Prone position||Circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||Linear staple gun and Z-stitch|
|Sutton et al. (2002) ||10||Transhiatal||Supine position||Transorally circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||NR|
|Nguyen et al. (2008) ||51||Transthoracic||Left lateral decubitus position||Transorally circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||NR|
|Campos et al. (2010) ||37||Transthoracic||NR||Transorally circular stapled||End-to-side||NA||NR|
|Ben-David et al. (2010) ||6||Transthoracic||Left lateral decubitus position||Linear stapled||Side-to-side||NA||NR|
|Gorenstein et al. (2011) ||31||Transthoracic||Left lateral decubitus position||Linear stapled||Side-to-side||NA||NR|
aDuring performance of anastomosis
NA not applicable; NR not reported
Anastomotic outcome in minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
|Study||No. patients||Anastomotic leak||Anastomotic stenosis|
|Watson et al. (1999) ||2||0||0|
|Cadiere et al. (2010) ||1||0||0|
|Lee et al. (1997) ||8||0||1 (12.5%)|
|Nguyen et al. (2001) ||1||0||0|
|Misawa et al. (2005) ||5||0||0|
|Bizekis et al. (2006) ||50||3 (6%)||6 (12%)|
|Thairu et al. (2007) ||18||0||Not reported|
|Sutton et al. (2002) ||10||1 (10%)||Not reported|
|Nguyen et al. (2008) ||51||5 (9.8%)||14 (27.5%)|
|Campos et al. (2010) ||37||1 (2.7%)||5 (13.5%)|
|Ben-David et al. (2010) ||6||Not reported||0|
|Gorenstein et al. (2011) ||31||1 (3.2%)||Not reported|
|Chasseray et al. (1989)a ||49||2 (4%)||7 (14.3%)|
|Walther et al. (2003a) ||42||0||12 (28.6%)|
aConventional open esophagectomy
Keywords: Keywords Oesophageal, Thoracoscopy, Esophagus, Ivor Lewis, Intrathoracic, Anastomosis, Minimally invasive.
Previous Document: Dense and vertically-aligned centimetre-long ZnS nanowire arrays: ionic liquid assisted synthesis an...
Next Document: Search for the molecular basis of ultra-rapid CYP2C9-catalysed metabolism: relationship between SNP ...