| Minimally invasive hip resurfacing compared to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 19583536 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BACKGROUND: Since its March 2006 FDA approval in the United States, Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) has been a popular alternative to hip arthroplasty for the younger patient population. Data to date has shown a trend toward low incidence of dislocation and good survivorship. METHODS: 128 patients operated on by a single surgeon from July 2006 to December 2008 were reviewed for complications, pain, and function. A group of single incision, minimally invasive standard total hip replacements (106 cases) in 2008 was used for comparison of the same outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pain, function, and total Harris Hip scores were all improved by the 2 year mark and better than the total hip group. Overall incision lengths decreased over the study time period. The average age of the BHR recipient was 51 years, approximately 14 years less than the total hip mean age. Pain in the Birmingham group improved by 32 points at the 3 month mark. By the end of 2 years, the Birmingham group Harris Hip score mean was nearly perfect at 98.5 points. Rare incidence of complications, marked decreased pain scores and marked elevation in function were results found in this sample of Birmingham resurfacing. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Michael L Swank; Martha R Alkire |
Related Documents
:
|
3403586 - Total hip arthroplasty in the ankylosed hip. a ten-year follow-up. 8116396 - Anatomic cementless total hip replacement: design considerations and early clinical exp... 8620636 - Preoperative nutritional status and outcome of elective total hip replacement. 9613546 - Six years of continuous intrathecal infusion of opioid and bupivacaine in the treatment... 20859726 - Experience of silicone gel sheets for patients with keloid scars after median sternotomy. 17786056 - Persistence of treatment and blood pressure control in elderly hypertensive patients tr... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases Volume: 67 ISSN: 1936-9719 ISO Abbreviation: Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis Publication Date: 2009 |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2009-07-08 Completed Date: 2009-08-28 Revised Date: 2010-03-24 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 101300541 Medline TA: Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 113-5 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
The Cincinnati Orthopaedic Research Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45242, USA. mswank2789@aol.com |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Adult Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects, methods* Female Hip Joint / physiopathology, surgery* Humans Joint Diseases / physiopathology, surgery* Male Middle Aged Pain Measurement Pain, Postoperative / etiology, prevention & control Range of Motion, Articular Recovery of Function Retrospective Studies Severity of Illness Index Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
Next Document: Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a compariso...