Document Detail


Minimally invasive hip resurfacing compared to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19583536     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Since its March 2006 FDA approval in the United States, Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) has been a popular alternative to hip arthroplasty for the younger patient population. Data to date has shown a trend toward low incidence of dislocation and good survivorship. METHODS: 128 patients operated on by a single surgeon from July 2006 to December 2008 were reviewed for complications, pain, and function. A group of single incision, minimally invasive standard total hip replacements (106 cases) in 2008 was used for comparison of the same outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pain, function, and total Harris Hip scores were all improved by the 2 year mark and better than the total hip group. Overall incision lengths decreased over the study time period. The average age of the BHR recipient was 51 years, approximately 14 years less than the total hip mean age. Pain in the Birmingham group improved by 32 points at the 3 month mark. By the end of 2 years, the Birmingham group Harris Hip score mean was nearly perfect at 98.5 points. Rare incidence of complications, marked decreased pain scores and marked elevation in function were results found in this sample of Birmingham resurfacing.
Authors:
Michael L Swank; Martha R Alkire
Related Documents :
3403586 - Total hip arthroplasty in the ankylosed hip. a ten-year follow-up.
8116396 - Anatomic cementless total hip replacement: design considerations and early clinical exp...
8620636 - Preoperative nutritional status and outcome of elective total hip replacement.
9613546 - Six years of continuous intrathecal infusion of opioid and bupivacaine in the treatment...
20859726 - Experience of silicone gel sheets for patients with keloid scars after median sternotomy.
17786056 - Persistence of treatment and blood pressure control in elderly hypertensive patients tr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases     Volume:  67     ISSN:  1936-9719     ISO Abbreviation:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis     Publication Date:  2009  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-07-08     Completed Date:  2009-08-28     Revised Date:  2010-03-24    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101300541     Medline TA:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  113-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
The Cincinnati Orthopaedic Research Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45242, USA. mswank2789@aol.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects,  methods*
Female
Hip Joint / physiopathology,  surgery*
Humans
Joint Diseases / physiopathology,  surgery*
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative / etiology,  prevention & control
Range of Motion, Articular
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
Next Document:  Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a compariso...