Document Detail

Microtubule distribution in somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine embryos following control of nuclear remodeling type.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20458148     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
This study was conducted to evaluate the microtubule distribution following control of nuclear remodeling by treatment of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos with caffeine or roscovitine. Bovine somatic cells were fused to enucleated oocytes treated with either 5 mM caffeine or 150 microM roscovitine to control the type of nuclear remodeling. The proportion of embryos that underwent premature chromosome condensation (PCC) was increased by caffeine treatment but was reduced by roscovitine treatment (p < 0.05). The microtubule organization was examined by immunostaining beta- and gamma-tubulins at 15 min, 3 h, and 20 h of fusion using laser scanning confocal microscopy. The gamma-tubulin foci inherited from the donor centrosome were observed in most of the SCNT embryos at 15 min of fusion (91.3%) and most of them did not disappear until 3 h after fusion, regardless of treatment (82.9-87.2%). A significantly high proportion of embryos showing an abnormal chromosome or microtubule distribution was observed in the roscovitinetreated group (40.0%, p < 0.05) compared to the caffeinetreated group (22.1%). In conclusion, PCC is a favorable condition for the normal organization of microtubules, and inhibition of PCC can cause abnormal mitotic division of bovine SCNT embryos by causing microtubule dysfunction.
Dae Jin Kwon; Yu Mi Lee; In Sun Hwang; Choon Keun Park; Boo Keun Yang; Hee Tae Cheong
Related Documents :
1132248 - Incidence and origin of heteroploidy, especially haploidy, in chick embryos from intral...
16716318 - Instability in the transmission of the myotonic dystrophy ctg repeat in human oocytes a...
6825938 - Deletion mapping of the t/t complex: evidence for a second region of critical embryonic...
2241238 - The effect of copper on the embryonic development and hatching of sepia officinalis l.
17218068 - Apolipoprotein m likely extends its anti-atherogenesis via anti-inflammation.
2898098 - Double minute chromosomes can be produced from precursors derived from a chromosomal de...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of veterinary science     Volume:  11     ISSN:  1976-555X     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Vet. Sci.     Publication Date:  2010 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-11     Completed Date:  2011-01-21     Revised Date:  2013-05-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100964185     Medline TA:  J Vet Sci     Country:  Korea (South)    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  93-101     Citation Subset:  IM    
College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Caffeine / pharmacology
Cattle / embryology,  physiology*
Cell Nucleus / drug effects,  physiology*,  ultrastructure
Fertilization in Vitro / veterinary
Microscopy, Confocal / veterinary
Microtubules / drug effects,  physiology*,  ultrastructure
Nuclear Transfer Techniques / veterinary
Oocytes / physiology*
Purines / pharmacology
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Purines; 0/roscovitine; 58-08-2/Caffeine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Vet Sci
Journal ID (publisher-id): JVS
ISSN: 1229-845X
ISSN: 1976-555X
Publisher: The Korean Society of Veterinary Science
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2010 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science
Print publication date: Month: 6 Year: 2010
Electronic publication date: Day: 11 Month: 5 Year: 2010
Volume: 11 Issue: 2
First Page: 93 Last Page: 101
ID: 2873821
PubMed Id: 20458148
DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2010.11.2.93

Microtubule distribution in somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine embryos following control of nuclear remodeling type
Dae-Jin Kwon1
Yu-Mi Lee1
In-Sun Hwang2
Choon-Keun Park2
Boo-Keun Yang2
Hee-Tae Cheong1
1College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea.
2College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea.
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Tel: +82-33-250-8659; Fax: +82-33-244-2367,


In somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), the nuclear remodeling of the transferred nucleus might play an important role in the subsequent development of SCNT embryos [2,13], and this may be relevant to the microtubule assembly of the donor nucleus. Microtubules are major cytoskeletal elements found in mammalian oocytes and have a crucial role in meiotic/mitotic events, such as chromosomal movement and cellular division. Accurate cytoskeletal movement is essential for normal embryo development. Microtubules are composed of α- and β-tubulins, which are organized around a microtubule-organizing center (MTOC). In animal cells, a centrosome comprising a pair of centrioles surrounded by pericentriolar material acts as an MTOC. In mammals, the centrosome plays a vital role both in microtubule nucleation and in establishing spindle bipolarity [9,10]. γ-tubulin, the permanently centrosome-associated microtubule-nucleating protein, is an essential centrosome component associated with the pericentriolar region [24] and nucleates the centriolar microtubules [18,20,30]. Thus, the γ-tubulin foci that are located in the spindle poles are considered to represent centrosomes [23].

Cellular events occurring within hours of SCNT are important for the survival of cloned embryos. Nevertheless, little is known about the nuclear and cytoplasmic changes associated with the integration of donor cells into the recipient cytoplasm [28]. During SCNT, the meiotic spindle complex of an oocyte is removed, and the centrosome of a donor cell is introduced into the enucleated recipient cytoplasm. Moreover, the fate of the transferred centrosome might be affected by the type of nuclear remodeling in the transferred donor cells.

In SCNT, the level of maturation promoting factor (MPF) activity in the recipient oocyte can affect the remodeling type of a transferred nucleus, which can in turn affect the reprogramming of SCNT embryos, including steps involving blastocyst development and the methylation status [13,16,19]. The MPF activity can be controlled by p34cdc2 kinase-activity regulators, caffeine [11], and roscovitine [7]. Caffeine increases the MPF activity [11], whereas roscovitine decreases the MPF activity of recipient oocytes [7].

The present study was carried out to evaluate the microtubule distribution following regulation of the nuclear remodeling type by caffeine or roscovitine treatments in bovine SCNT embryos.

Materials and Methods
In vitro maturation of oocytes

Bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated from follicles (2- to 7-mm diameter) of ovaries and selected based on their morphology. They were washed in Tyrode's lactate-Hepes buffer containing 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA; Sigma, USA). The culture medium for in vitro maturation was Tissue Culture Medium 199 (TCM199; Gibco-BRL, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-BRL, USA), 0.02 U/mL follicle-stimulating hormone (Sigma, USA), 1 µg/mL estradiol (Sigma, USA), and 50 µg/mL gentamicin (Sigma, USA). Ten COCs were transferred into 50 µL droplets of maturation medium overlaid with paraffin oil and cultured for 20-22 h at 39℃, 5% CO2 in air.

Enucleation of oocytes and treatment with caffeine and roscovitine

After in vitro maturation of COCs, the cumulus cells were removed by vortexing for 5 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) hyaluronidase (Sigma, USA) and 0.1% (w/v) PVA (Sigma, USA). Before the enucleation, oocytes were cultured in TCM199 containing 0.4 µg/mL demecolcine for 40 min to extrude their metaphase II (MII) chromosome mass [29]. The enucleation of oocytes was carried out by removing the MII chromosome mass and the 1st polar body in Hepes-buffered TCM199 (Gibco-BRL, USA) supplemented with 3 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, USA) and 5 µg/mL cytochalasin B (CB; Sigma, USA). Prior to nuclear transfer, enucleated oocytes were cultured in TCM199 (Gibco-BRL, USA) containing 3 mg/mL BSA and either 5 mM caffeine (Sigma, USA) for 6 h or 150 µM roscovitine (Sigma, USA) for 1.5 h [19]. In our separate study, treatments with caffeine and roscovitine did not affect the development of bovine parthenogenetic embryos [19].

Nuclear transfer procedure

SCNT was carried out in Hepes-buffered TCM199 supplemented with 3 mg/mL BSA and 5 µg/mL CB (Sigma, USA). Ear skin fibroblast cells (4~6 passaged) from a Korean native cow were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco-BRL, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco-BRL, USA) and 50 µg/mL gentamicin (Sigma, USA) for 2~3 days, and then cultured for 5 days in DMEM/F12 containing 0.5% FBS. Before injection, the cells were trypsinized and then centrifuged in TCM199 medium supplemented with 3 mg/mL BSA. Subsequently, a donor cell was transferred into the perivitelline space of enucleated recipient oocytes at the same maturational age (at around the 27~28 h of IVM) for all types of recipient oocytes. For the caffeine- or roscovitine-treated enucleated oocytes, donor cells were transferred within 0.5 h after release from these chemicals.

Electrofusion and activation

Reconstructed oocytes were electrically fused. They were placed between wire electrodes (1 mm apart) of a fusion chamber that was overlaid with 0.3 M mannitol solution supplemented with 0.1 mM MgSO4, 0.05 mM CaCl2 and 0.1% BSA. A single direct-current pulse of 1.3 kV/cm was applied for 30 µsec using a BTX Electro Cell Manipulator 200 (BTX, USA). After fusion treatment, the fused oocytes were activated using 10 µM Ca-ionophore (A23187; Sigma, USA) for 5 min and subsequently cultured in CR1aa [21] containing 2 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine (Sigma, USA) for 4 h.

Evaluation of nuclear remodeling type

The SCNT embryos were whole mounted 1.5 h after fusion to assess the type of remodeling of the transferred nucleus. The SCNT embryos were mounted on slides, fixed with a mixture of ethanol and acetic acid (3 : 1) for 48 h, then stained with 1% aceto-orcein for 5 min and washed in 25% (v/v) aceto-glycerol. The nuclear morphology was observed under a phase-contrast microscope (×400). Transferred nuclei showing a chromosome plate or a condensed chromatin clump were classified as PCC and those displaying a pronucleus (PN)-like structure without nuclear envelop breakdown (NEBD) were classified as non-PCC (NPCC) [3].

In vitro fertilization (IVF)

In vitro oocytes matured for 22 h were inseminated with frozen-thawed spermatozoa (2 × 106 spermatozoa/mL) in a 50 µL drop of BO medium [1] containing 5 mM caffeine (Sigma, USA), 10 µg/mL heparin (Sigma, USA) and 3 mg/mL BSA at 39℃, 5% CO2 in air for 8 h.

In vitro culture of embryos

After activation or insemination culture, the SCNT embryos and IVF embryos were further cultured in CR1aa containing 3 mg/mL BSA and 50 µg/mL gentamicin at 39℃, 5% CO2 in air for 16~20 h. In one experiment, IVF embryos were treated with caffeine for 6 h or roscovitine for 1.5 h at the beginning of culture to evaluate the effects of chemicals on the microtubule distribution of embryos at the first mitotic phase.

Immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy

For the confocal microscopy, fused embryos were fixed 15 min, 3 h and 20 h after fusion with 3.7% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (Sigma, USA) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. IVF embryos were fixed at 28 h of insemination. MII oocytes were also fixed. Fixed oocytes and embryos were stored in PBS containing 3 mg/mL BSA and 0.02% (w/v) sodium azide for 1 week at 4℃. They were then permeabilized by transferring into PBS containing 0.1% (w/v) Triton X-100, 3 mg/mL BSA and 0.02% (w/v) sodium azide for 50 min at 39℃. After several washing steps with PBS containing 0.01% (w/v) Triton X-100, they were incubated in a blocking solution with PBS containing 150 mM glycine, 3 mg/mL BSA and 0.02% (w/v) sodium azide for 50 min at 39℃. Microtubule localization was conducted using a mouse monoclonal antibody against β-tubulin (Sigma, USA) and rabbit monoclonal antibody against γ-tubulin (Sigma, USA). Oocytes and embryos were incubated for 1 h at 39℃ with 1 : 200 (w/v) dilutions of anti-β-tubulin and anti-γ-tubulin. Primary antibodies were detected using Alexa-488 goat anti-mouse IgG and Alexa-546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, USA) at 1 : 100 (w/v) dilutions. Oocytes and embryos were incubated with secondary antibody for 40 min at 39℃. DNA was stained with 2 µg/mL of Hoechst 33342 for 40 min at 39℃. Stained oocytes and embryos were then mounted on slides in Vecta-Shield antifade (Vector Laboratories, USA) under a coverslip. The samples were examined with a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 510; Jena, Germany).

Chromosome analysis

Embryos were fixed by the air-drying method in order to analyze the chromosome constitutions. After 12 h of activation, one-cell stage SCNT embryos were incubated for 6~8 h in CR1aa containing 0.4 µg/mL of nocodazole (Sigma, USA) in order to arrest cleavage division at the mitotic phase. They were then treated for 10 min with a hypotonic solution of 0.9% trisodium citrate. The embryos were fixed for 10 min with a mixture of methanol, acetic acid, and distilled water (5 : 1 : 4), mounted on a slide, and further fixed by the drop application of a mixture of methanol and acetic acid (3 : 1), followed by soaking in the same fixative. The samples were rinsed in a mixture of methanol, acetic acid, and distilled water (3 : 4 : 1) to remove cytoplasmic debris, stained for 10 min with 5% Giemsa, and the chromosome constitutions of the embryos were assessed.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by Duncan's multiple-range tests using the General Linear Model procedure of the software package Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, USA).

Nuclear remodeling type in NT embryos

In the control group, 72.1% (88/122) of the SCNT embryos showed PCC. Caffeine treatment resulted in a higher occurrence of PCC (81.7%, 98/120, p < 0.05), whereas roscovitine treatment resulted in a lower occurrence of PCC (24.2%, 29/120, p < 0.05).

Microtubule distribution after NT

The microtubule distribution in bovine SCNT embryos at 15 min and the effects of caffeine and roscovitine on the distribution at 3 h after fusion are indicated in Figs. 1 and 2. The γ-tubulin focus was not observed in matured MII oocytes (Fig. 1A) and in a small number (4/46, 8.7%, Fig. 2) of SCNT embryos at 15 min after fusion (Fig. 1B). The γ-tubulin focus inherited from the donor centrosome (Figs. 1C and D) was observed in the majority of SCNT embryos at 15 min of fusion (91.3%, Fig. 2), and most of these γ-tubulin foci did not disappear from their cytoplasm until 3 h after fusion, regardless of treatment (82.9~87.2%, Fig. 2).

Microtubule organization in the first mitotic phase of SCNT embryos

Microtubule distributions in the SCNT embryos at the first mitotic phase are shown in Fig. 3. One or two γ-tubulin foci were formed around the PN-like structure of SCNT embryos in the interphase (Fig. 3A). At the mitotic phase, the spindle microtubule was completely formed from the γ-tubulin foci (Figs. 3B and C). The spindle microtubule was maintained until the anaphase (Fig. 3D), but the γ-tubulin foci had disappeared at the ana-telophase in SCNT embryos (Fig. 3E). γ-Tubulin focus was detected at the two-cell stage of SCNT embryos (Fig. 3F). This pattern was similar to that of IVF embryos (not shown).

Microtubule organization in the first mitotic phase of bovine SCNT embryos following treatment with caffeine or roscovitine is summarized in Table 1. There was no difference in the proportion of embryos showing γ-tubulin focus among the three groups. Various types of embryos showing an abnormal microtubule distribution were detected in the first mitotic phase of SCNT embryos (Fig. 4). The proportion of embryos showing an abnormal microtubule distribution was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the roscovitine-treated group (40.0%, 28/70) compared with the caffeine-treated group (22.1%, 15/68). There was no difference in the types of abnormal microtubule distribution among the treatment groups (not shown). There were no influences of caffeine and roscovitine on the microtubule distribution in the first mitotic phase of IVF embryos (data not shown).

Chromosome Constitutions of SCNT embryos

The chromosome constitutions of SCNT embryos at the 1-cell stage did not differ among the control and caffeine- and roscovitine-treated groups (Table 2). The proportion of embryos with a normal diploid chromosome set was 71.1 to 77.6%, regardless of treatments. Small numbers of haploid or tetraploid chromosome sets were noted. A similar frequency of aneuploid chromosome sets was also observed in all groups of SCNT embryos (16.3 to 26.7%).


In nuclear transfer studies, the MPF in the recipient cytoplasm can regulate the nuclear remodeling type of the donor nucleus [2,5]. In this study we used caffeine and roscovitine to regulate the MPF activity of the recipient cytoplasm. We did not evaluate the MPF activity of recipient oocytes; however, caffeine and roscovitine can successfully regulate both the MPF activity [7,11,13,19] and the subsequent nuclear remodeling type after transfer of donor cells [7,13]. The nuclear remodeling type of a transferred nucleus affects the subsequent development of nuclear transfer embryos [2,5,13,19].

The remodeling of the centrosome in SCNT embryos is important because centrosomes are introduced along with the donor nucleus and carry out many critical functions that are normally carried out by the sperm centrosomes. In mammal cells, γ-tubulin is an essential component associated with the pericentriolar region of the centrosome [24]. The γ-tubulin was reported to participate in the spindle assembly of bovine SCNT embryos, to be located in the spindle poles, and, when associated with interphase nuclei, to represent reconstituted centrosomes [23]. In this study, γ-tubulin foci were observed in all of the cell cycle phases in SCNT embryos except the ana-telophase. The result in SCNT embryos showed that the centrosomes of donor cells are normally passed on to recipient oocytes. At 20 h after fusion, most of the SCNT embryos at the first mitotic stage had one or two (duplicated) γ-tubulin foci, which were classified as normal, whereas some embryos had more than three γ-tubulin foci. Two-cell embryos had two, three, or four γ-tubulin foci, which were ascertained as normal. The duration of the second cell cycle in bovine embryos is very short-about 9 h. Therefore, most two-cell embryos are expected to enter the S-phase of the second cell cycle immediately after cleavage [14], and may have three (partially duplicated) or four (duplicated) γ-tubulin foci. In this study, the γ-tubulin foci disappeared in the ana-telophase in SCNT embryos. Zhong et al. [31] reported that faint γ-tubulin staining was located at the spindle poles, although centrosomes were not detected at the telophase of SCNT porcine embryos. In another study, two centrosomes, presumably produced by splitting, were detected at the anaphase and telophase of the first mitotic stage in SCNT bovine embryos [6]. We cannot predict whether the lack of γ-tubulin foci at the ana/telophase transition stage in this study is because of the faint γ-tubulin staining or the dispersion of γ-tubulin foci.

The microtubule localization and nuclear progression of SCNT embryos were visualized by immunostaining of β- or γ-tubulin and DNA. By the SCNT procedure, the centrosome (γ-tubulin focus) of a donor cell is introduced into a recipient cytoplasm and is located in association with a PN-like structure in bovine [23]. In our study, the γ-tubulin focus of the donor cell was observed near the transferred nucleus of bovine SCNT embryos immediately after fusion and was detected 3 h after fusion also. Studies on the mouse SCNT showed that many acentrosomal γ-tubulin foci generated in cytoplasm disappeared after activation [17] and that a donor centrin, which is a basic component of the centrosome [22], is also degraded in activated ooplasm [32]. It is suggested that the pattern of centrosome inheritance during SCNT may differ among species. In our study, the transition pattern of the donor centrosome (γ-tubulin focus) was not different among the control, caffeine and roscovitine groups. It is hence suggested that the transition pattern of the centrosome from a donor cell is not affected by the type of nuclear remodeling.

A high frequency of abnormal chromosome and microtubule distribution was observed in the roscovitine-treated group. It was reported that roscovitine treatment can induce some morphological modifications of cytoplasmic components such as mitochondria and cytoskeletons of matured oocytes [8,15]. In our study, there was no influence of roscovitine on the microtubule distribution in the first mitotic phase of IVF embryos. Furthermore, in our separate study, there were no adverse effects on the developmental capability of parthenogenetic embryos treated with roscovitine under the same conditions as in the present study [19]. Therefore, it is possible that the NPCC, but not roscovitine treatment itself, could affect the cytoplasmic components of the transferred donor cell, which could in turn induce an abnormal microtubule formation due to the incomplete remodeling of the transferred centrosome. It was previously suggested that NEBD is a critical step in the reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei in its allowing of the direct interaction of chromosomes with cytoplasmic factors in nonactivated oocytes [12,25,27]. It was also suggested that MPF activity itself does not directly regulate the reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei, but that the exposure of donor chromosomes to oocyte cytoplasm, i.e. the induction of NEBD and PCC, is important for the occurrence of essential events that facilitate the reprogramming of the donor nuclei at the G0/G1 stage [26]. It appears that the increased abnormal microtubules might be responsible for the low in vitro development of NPCC-induced SCNT embryos [13,19].

In bovine SCNT, some PCC-induced embryos harbored multiple chromatin clumps and extruded a polar body after activation treatment, and may have resulted in aneuploid chromosome constitutions [4]. In this study, we did not address polar body extrusion, but approximately 22~29% of embryos manifested abnormal ploidy. We cannot, at this point, be sure as to whether the abnormal ploidy resulted from PCC or from NPCC, as similar proportions of embryos with abnormal ploidy were observed regardless of the treatments administered. It appears that the abnormal microtubule distributions of the SCNT embryos after treatment with roscovitine do not influence the chromosome constitutions of the SCNT embryos at the 1-cell stage.

In conclusion, the nuclear remodeling type, which is regulated by caffeine or roscovitine treatments, appears to be related to microtubule function in the early embryonic stages of SCNT embryos. The PCC is a more favorable condition for the normal organization of microtubules, and inhibition of PCC may lead to incessant abnormal mitotic division of bovine SCNT embryos by causing dysfunction of their microtubules, which can affect their subsequent development [19].


We thank Mr. Seung-Hae Kwon of the Korea Basic Science Institute, Chuncheon, Korea, for his expert assistance with confocal microscopy. This work was supported by a Korea Research Foundation Grant, funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD) (KRF-2006-311-F00018).

1. Brackett BG,Oliphant G. Capacitation of rabbit spermatozoa in vitroBiol ReprodYear: 1975122602741122333
2. Cheong HT,Takahashi Y,Kanagawa H. Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle-stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytesBiol ReprodYear: 1993489589638481482
3. Cheong HT,Takahashi Y,Kanagawa H. Relationship between nuclear remodeling and subsequent development of mouse embryonic nuclei transferred to enucleated oocytesMol Reprod DevYear: 1994371381458179897
4. Choi JY,Kim CI,Park CK,Yang BK,Cheong HT. Effect of activation time on the nuclear remodeling and in vitro development of nuclear transfer embryos derived from bovine somatic cellsMol Reprod DevYear: 20046928929515349840
5. Collas P,Robl JM. Relationship between nuclear remodeling and development in nuclear transplant rabbit embryosBiol ReprodYear: 1991454554651782294
6. Dai Y,Wang L,Wang H,Liu Y,Li N,Lyu Q,Keefe DL,Albertini DF,Liu L. Fate of centrosomes following somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in bovine oocytesReproductionYear: 20061311051106116735544
7. Ito J,Hirabayashi M,Kato M,Takeuchi A,Ito M,Shimada M,Hochi S. Contribution of high p34cdc2 kinase activity to premature chromosome condensation of injected somatic cell nuclei in rat oocytesReproductionYear: 200512917118015695611
8. Ju JC,Tsay C,Ruan CW. Alterations and reversibility in the chromatin, cytoskeleton and development of pig oocytes treated with roscovitineMol Reprod DevYear: 20036448249112589660
9. Kalt A,Schliwa M. Molecular components of the centrosomeTrends Cell BiolYear: 1993311812814731766
10. Kellogg DR,Moritz M,Alberts BM. The centrosome and cellular organizationAnnu Rev BiochemYear: 1994636396747979251
11. Kikuchi K,Naito K,Noguchi J,Shimada A,Kaneko H,Yamashita M,Aoki F,Tojo H,Toyoda Y. Maturation/M-phase promoting factor: a regulator of aging in porcine oocytesBiol ReprodYear: 20006371572210952912
12. Kim JM,Ogura A,Nagata M,Aoki F. Analysis of the mechanism for chromatin remodeling in embryos reconstructed by somatic nuclear transferBiol ReprodYear: 20026776076612193382
13. Kwon DJ,Park CK,Yang BK,Cheong HT. Control of nuclear remodelling and subsequent in vitro development and methylation status of porcine nuclear transfer embryosReproductionYear: 200813564965618411411
14. Lequarre AS,Marchandise J,Moreau B,Massip A,Donnay I. Cell cycle duration at the time of maternal zygotic transition for in vitro produced bovine embryos: effect of oxygen tension and transcription inhibitionBiol ReprodYear: 2003691707171312890737
15. Lonergan P,Faerge I,Hyttel PM,Boland M,Fair T. Ultrastructural modifications in bovine oocytes maintained in meiotic arrest in vitro using roscovitine or butyrolactoneMol Reprod DevYear: 20036436937812548669
16. Ma W,Zhang D,Hou Y,Li YH,Sun QY,Sun XF,Wang WH. Reduced expression of MAD2, BCL2, and MAP kinase activity in pig oocytes after in vitro aging are associated with defects in sister chromatid segregation during meiosis II and embryo fragmentation after activationBiol ReprodYear: 20057237338315469999
17. Miki H,Inoue K,Ogonuki N,Mochida K,Nagashima H,Baba T,Ogura A. Cytoplasmic asters are required for progression past the first cell cycle in cloned mouse embryosBiol ReprodYear: 2004712022202815317686
18. Moudjou M,Bordes N,Paintrand M,Bornens M. γ-Tubulin in mammalian cells: The centrosomal and the cytosolic formsJ Cell SciYear: 19961098758878718679
19. Park JH,Choi YL,Kwon DJ,Hwang IS,Park CK,Yang BK,Cheong HT. Control of MPF activity of recipient oocytes and subsequent development and DNA methylation of somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine embryosReprod Dev BiolYear: 200933223228
20. Raff JW,Kellogg DR,Alberts BM. Drosophila γ-tubulin is part of a complex containing two previously identified centrosomal MAPsJ Cell BiolYear: 19931218238358491775
21. Rosenkrans CF Jr,First NL. Culture of bovine zygotes to the blastocyst stage: effects of amino acids and vitaminsTheriogenologyYear: 199135266
22. Salisbury JL. Centrin, centrosomes, and mitotic spindle polesCurr Opin Cell BiolYear: 1995739457755988
23. Shin MR,Park SW,Shim H,Kim NH. Nuclear and microtubule reorganization in nuclear-transferred bovine embryosMol Reprod DevYear: 200262748211933163
24. Stearns T,Evans L,Kirschner M. γ-Tubulin is a highly conserved component of the centrosomeCellYear: 1991658258361840506
25. Tani T,Kato Y,Tsunoda Y. Direct exposure of chromosomes to nonactivated ovum cytoplasm is effective for bovine somatic cell nucleus reprogrammingBiol ReprodYear: 20016432433011133690
26. Tani T,Kato Y,Tsunoda Y. Reprogramming of bovine somatic cell nuclei is not directly regulated by maturation promoting factor or mitogen-activated protein kinase activityBiol ReprodYear: 2003691890189412904315
27. Wakayama T,Perry ACF,Zuccotti M,Johnson KR,Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nucleiNatureYear: 199839469749665128
28. Wilmut I,Beaujean N,de Sousa PA,Dinnyes A,King TJ,Paterson LA,Wells DN,Young LE. Somatic cell nuclear transferNatureYear: 200241958358612374931
29. Yin XJ,Tani T,Yonemura I,Kawakami M,Miyamoto K,Hasegawa R,Kato Y,Tsunoda Y. Production of cloned pigs from adult somatic cells by chemically assisted removal of maternal chromosomesBiol ReprodYear: 20026744244612135879
30. Zheng Y,Wong ML,Alberts B,Mitchison T. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a γ-tubulin-containing ring complexNatureYear: 19953785785838524390
31. Zhong Z,Spate L,Hao Y,Li R,Lai L,Katayama M,Sun QY,Prather RS,Schatten H. Remodeling of centrosomes in intraspecies and interspecies nuclear transfer porcine embryosCell CycleYear: 200761510152117581281
32. Zhong ZS,Zhang G,Meng XQ,Zhang YL,Chen DY,Schatten H,Sun QY. Function of donor cell centrosome in intraspecies and interspecies nuclear transfer embryosExp Cell ResYear: 2005306354615878330

Article Categories:
  • Original Article

Keywords: centrosome, microtubule, MPF, nuclear remodeling, SCNT.

Previous Document:  [Neurophysiological effect of flavor and caffeine added to toothpaste].
Next Document:  Role of PKG-L-type calcium channels in the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal sildenafil.