Document Detail


Microtensile bond strength of photoactivated and autopolymerized adhesive systems to root dentin using translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17394915     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The use of fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in endodontically treated teeth has increased. However, selecting an adhesive system that provides reliable and long-lasting bonding to root canal dentin remains difficult. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength of 2 adhesive systems to root dentin and 2 different fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted teeth were instrumented, and root canals were prepared for translucent (Light Post [LP]) or opaque (Aestheti Post [AP]) quartz fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. Two adhesive systems were used: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SBMP) (autopolymerized) as a control group, and Single Bond (SB) (photoactivated). Teeth were assigned to 4 groups (n=10): SBMP+LP, SBMP+AP, SB+LP, SB+AP. After post cementation, roots were perpendicularly sectioned into 1-mm-thick slices, which were trimmed to obtain dumbbell-shaped specimens. The specimens were divided into 3 regions: cervical (C), middle (M), and apical (A). To determine the bond strength, the bonding area of each specimen was calculated, and specimens were attached to a device to test microtensile strength at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using 3-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (alpha=.05). Fractured specimens were examined under a x 25 stereomicroscope to determine the mode of fracture. RESULTS: There were significant differences only among root dentin regions (P<.001). The cervical third (9.16 +/- 1.18 MPa) presented higher mean bond strength values, especially for SBMP. Middle and apical regions demonstrated lower values (7.08 +/- 0.92 and 7.31 +/- 0.60 MPa, respectively). Adhesive and post main factors did not demonstrate significance. Also, no interaction was significant. No cohesive fractures within resin cement, fiber-reinforced composite resin post, or root dentin were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Both adhesive systems tested demonstrated reliable bonding when used with translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts.
Authors:
Andre Mallmann; Leticia Borges Jacques; Luis Felipe Valandro; Antonio Muench
Related Documents :
18086435 - Effect of variation of root post in different layers of tooth: linear vs nonlinear fini...
21860975 - Auditory neuropathy/auditory dyssynchrony in children with cochlear implants.
1945345 - The ilizarov method: rancho technique.
15479585 - Long-term follow-up of gastric stimulation for obesity: the mestre 8-year experience.
18564955 - Traditional chinese medicine tongue inspection: an examination of the inter- and intrap...
11980745 - A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of prosthetic dentistry     Volume:  97     ISSN:  0022-3913     ISO Abbreviation:  J Prosthet Dent     Publication Date:  2007 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-03-30     Completed Date:  2007-05-22     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376364     Medline TA:  J Prosthet Dent     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  165-72     Citation Subset:  D; IM    
Affiliation:
School of Dentistry, Bahiana Foundation for Science Development, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Analysis of Variance
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / chemistry,  radiation effects
Cementation*
Composite Resins* / chemistry
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentin-Bonding Agents*
Humans
Phase Transition
Post and Core Technique*
Quartz
Resin Cements* / chemistry,  radiation effects
Tensile Strength
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Composite Resins; 0/Dentin-Bonding Agents; 0/Resin Cements; 0/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus; 0/single bond; 14808-60-7/Quartz; 1565-94-2/Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The effects of different types of investments on the alpha-case layer of titanium castings.
Next Document:  Influence of simulated microwave disinfection on complete denture base adaptation using different fl...