Document Detail


Merit of outliers for milk yield as indicators of accuracy of genetic evaluations of sires.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9839239     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
To determine whether the accuracy of the genetic evaluations of sires can be assessed by the presence of extreme daughter records, we studied herd-years with records from first-crop daughters of 217 Holstein bulls that were not sampled by artificial insemination (AI) organizations but that later entered AI. The presence of outliers for standardized milk yield was determined within herd-year. Outliers were defined as records exceeding 1.5 interquartile ranges below the 25th percentile or above the 75th percentile. Herd-years were separated into two groups based on whether or not an outlier daughter record was present for an AI bull that had initially been sampled through non-AI. Herd-years without daughter outliers from those bulls were divided into herd-years with 1) no daughter outliers from any bull, 2) only negative daughter outliers from other bulls, 3) only positive daughter outliers from other bulls, or 4) negative and positive daughter outliers from other bulls. Herd-years with daughter outliers from AI bulls initially sampled through non-AI were divided into herd-years with 1) only negative daughter outliers, 2) only positive daughter outliers, 3) positive daughter outliers from those bulls and negative daughter outliers from other bulls, or 4) both negative and positive daughter outliers. The relationship between the frequency of outlier classes and a change in the Modified Contemporary Comparison genetic evaluations (the difference between the last available second-crop evaluation and the next to the last first-crop evaluation) was examined with logistic regression. For AI bulls that were initially sampled through non-AI and having evaluations that decreased > or = 386 kg, 9% of herd-years had positive first-crop daughter outliers and negative daughter outliers from other bulls; 38% had no outliers. For bulls with evaluations that increased > or = 194 kg, comparable percentages were 2 and 53%.
Authors:
T R Meinert; H D Norman
Related Documents :
11842309 - Cell-surface expression of cd25, cd26, and cd30 by allergen-specific t cells is intrins...
12403329 - Relationship between milk urea concentration and the fertility of dairy cows.
7033669 - A neglected mayan galactagogue - ixbut (euphorbia lancifolia).
22948829 - The use of the sex pheromone as an evolutionary solution to food source selection in ca...
24394619 - Hypolipidaemic foods in china.
21291479 - Rapid and simple detection of the inva gene in salmonella spp. by isothermal target and...
18403279 - The 1999 neuroendocrine workshop on food intake, energy metabolism and obesity, san die...
2348939 - Why do sugars taste good?
8708979 - Effect of alginate and alginate-cimetidine combination therapy on stimulated postprandi...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of dairy science     Volume:  81     ISSN:  0022-0302     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Dairy Sci.     Publication Date:  1998 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-02-09     Completed Date:  1999-02-09     Revised Date:  2003-11-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985126R     Medline TA:  J Dairy Sci     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2951-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
National Dairy Herd Improvement Association, Inc., Columbus, OH 43231-4078, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Breeding / methods*
Cattle / genetics*,  physiology
Female
Lactation / genetics*
Male
Regression Analysis

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding ...
Next Document:  Heritability of test day somatic cell counts and its relationship with milk yield and protein percen...