Document Detail

Medical technology assessment photic stimulation--standardization of screening methods.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10546250     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
RATIONALE: In many EEG laboratories in Europe, intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) is not performed routinely, and consequently, great variation exists in the type of photo stimulator used, the methodology employed, and the interpretation of the EEG curves, thus leading to different outcomes. METHODOLOGY: It was decided to hold a consensus meeting with experts in the field of photic stimulation from various European countries. This meeting was held at the Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, the Netherlands. The consensus reached was presented and discussed at the 9th European Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology in Ljubjana in June 1998. RESULTS: Patients should be positioned at a distance of 30 cm from the photic stimulator (nasion to lamp) with dim surrounding lights, just enough to see the patient. Flashes should be delivered in separate trains of 10 s for each frequency, with intervals of 7 s minimum. First stimulation occurs with eyes open followed after 5 s by eye closure, while starting at 1 Hz progressing to 20 Hz, unless generalised epileptiform discharges are evoked at a lower frequency. Then, frequencies should start at 60 Hz decreasing to 25 Hz. The following frequencies should be used: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 60, 50, 40, 30 and 25 Hz. The total duration is a maximum of 6 min (patients without a reaction to IPS). In interpreting the evoked responses, a clear distinction should be made between epileptiform responses confined to the occipital area (OSW), starting occipitally and spreading to frontal regions (OGSW), or generalised from the start (GSW). Other responses include generalised spikes (OR). CONCLUSION: This standard is safe, relatively quick, simple and reliable. Comparison of data within patients and between patients of various laboratories will also be possible. This will improve the quality of the care of the individual patient and make collaborative research possible.
D G Trenité; C D Binnie; G F Harding; A Wilkins; T Covanis; O Eeg-Olofsson; L Goosens; O Henriksen; G Krämer; F Leyten; F H Da Silva; A M Da Silva; R Naquet; B Pedersen; S Ricci; G Rubboli; H Spekreijse; S Waltz
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology     Volume:  29     ISSN:  0987-7053     ISO Abbreviation:  Neurophysiol Clin     Publication Date:  1999 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-12-15     Completed Date:  1999-12-15     Revised Date:  2005-11-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8804532     Medline TA:  Neurophysiol Clin     Country:  NETHERLANDS    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  318-24     Citation Subset:  IM    
Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Electroencephalography / instrumentation,  standards*
Photic Stimulation* / methods

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Medical technology assessment EEG and evoked potentials in the intensive care unit.
Next Document:  A comparison between group-average and individual evoked potential analysis