Document Detail


Medical ethics in the courtroom: a reappraisal.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9309550     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Following up on a 1989 paper on the subject, this essay revisits the question of ethical expertise in the court room. Informed by recent developments in the use of ethics experts, the authors argue 1) that the adversarial nature of court proceedings challenges the integrity of the ethicist's pedagogical role; 2) that the use of ethics experts as normative authorities remains dubious; 3) that clarification of the State's interest in "protecting the ethical integrity of the medical profession" is urgently required; and 4) that the expertise of the ethicist may be more appropriately used in advising the legislature that in influencing the court.
Authors:
V A Sharpe; E D Pellegrino
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of medicine and philosophy     Volume:  22     ISSN:  0360-5310     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Philos     Publication Date:  1997 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1997-11-25     Completed Date:  1997-11-25     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7610512     Medline TA:  J Med Philos     Country:  NETHERLANDS    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  373-9     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Hastings Center, Garrison, NY 10524, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Bioethical Issues
Cultural Diversity
Ethical Analysis
Ethicists*
Ethics Consultation
Ethics, Medical*
Expert Testimony / standards*
Government
Humans
Interinstitutional Relations
Judicial Role*
Jurisprudence
Legislation, Medical
Morals
Professional Role*
Referral and Consultation / standards
Social Values
Suicide, Assisted / legislation & jurisprudence
United States
Washington
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Med Philos. 1997 Aug;22(4):365-71   [PMID:  9309549 ]
J Med Philos. 1997 Aug;22(4):325-43   [PMID:  9309547 ]
J Med Philos. 1997 Aug;22(4):297-324   [PMID:  9309546 ]
J Med Philos. 1997 Aug;22(4):381-403   [PMID:  9309551 ]
J Med Philos. 1997 Aug;22(4):345-64   [PMID:  9309548 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Healthy skepticism: the emperor has very few clothes.
Next Document:  Ethics expert testimony: against the skeptics.