Document Detail

Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR): a point of convergence in the action of insulin/IGF-1 and G protein-coupled receptor agonists in pancreatic cancer cells.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  25295009     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common form of pancreatic cancer, is one of the most lethal human diseases. PDAC is now the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in both men and women and deaths due to PDAC are projected to increase dramatically. Novel targets and agents for chemoprevention are urgently needed and will most likely arise from a more detailed understanding of the signaling mechanisms that stimulate the promotion and progression of sub-malignant cells into pancreatic cancer cells and from the identification of modifiable risk factors for PDAC. Many epidemiological studies have linked obesity and long-standing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with increased risk and worse clinical outcomes for developing PDAC. These diet-related metabolic disorders are multifaceted but characterized by peripheral insulin resistance, compensatory overproduction of insulin and increased bioavailability of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Mounting evidence indicates that the insulin/IGF-1 receptor system plays a critical role in PDAC development and multiple studies support the notion that crosstalk between the insulin receptor and heptahelical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling systems is an important element in the biological responses elicited by these signaling systems, including cell proliferation. This article highlights the central role of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) in mediating crosstalk between insulin/IGF-1 and GPCR signaling in pancreatic cancer cells and proposes strategies, including the use of metformin, to target this signaling system in PDAC cells.
Enrique Rozengurt
Related Documents :
16805089 - Diagnostic challenge of zygomycosis in compromised hosts.
23104149 - Portal and systemic levels of visfatin in morbidly obese subjects undergoing bariatric ...
19385399 - Diagnosis and management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in adults.
4002439 - Malignant diabetes mellitus--a case report.
17428879 - Laparoscopy-guided myometrial biopsy in the definite diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis.
10682169 - New classification and diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus.
6341139 - Blood glucose and plasma insulin responses to various carbohydrates in type 2 (non-insu...
9364099 - A case of successfully treated giardiasis in pancreas.
16684809 - The role of vitamin d in multiple sclerosis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review     Date:  2014-09-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  Frontiers in physiology     Volume:  5     ISSN:  1664-042X     ISO Abbreviation:  Front Physiol     Publication Date:  2014  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-10-08     Completed Date:  2014-10-08     Revised Date:  2014-10-10    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101549006     Medline TA:  Front Physiol     Country:  Switzerland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  357     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Front Physiol
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Front Physiol
Journal ID (publisher-id): Front. Physiol.
ISSN: 1664-042X
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2014 Rozengurt.
Received Day: 30 Month: 7 Year: 2014
Accepted Day: 02 Month: 9 Year: 2014
Electronic publication date: Day: 23 Month: 9 Year: 2014
collection publication date: Year: 2014
Volume: 5E-location ID: 357
PubMed Id: 25295009
ID: 4171984
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00357

Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR): a point of convergence in the action of insulin/IGF-1 and G protein-coupled receptor agonists in pancreatic cancer cells
Enrique Rozengurt*
Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, Molecular Biology Institute, University of California at Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA, USA
[edited-by] Edited by: Guido Eibl, David Geffen School at Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, USA
[edited-by] Reviewed by: Georg Singer, Medical University of Graz, Austria; R. John MacLeod, Queen's University, Canada
Correspondence: *Correspondence: Enrique Rozengurt, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 900 Veteran Avenue, Warren Hall Room 11-124, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1786, USA e-mail:
[other] This article was submitted to Gastrointestinal Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common form of pancreatic cancer, is one of the most lethal human diseases. Indeed, the overall 5-year survival rate is a dismal 6% and the median survival period of 4–6 months. The incidence of this disease in the US is estimated to increase to more than 44,000 new cases in 2014 and is now the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in both men and women (Siegel et al., 2014). Total deaths due to PDAC are projected to increase dramatically (Rahib et al., 2014). Novel targets and agents for chemoprevention are urgently needed and will most likely arise from a more detailed understanding of the signaling mechanisms that stimulate the promotion and progression of sub-malignant cells into pancreatic cancer cells and from the identification of modifiable risk factors for PDAC. In this context, it is recognized that PDAC arises from the progression of precursor lesions, the most common of which are pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs). Progression from these non-invasive lesions to invasive cancer is associated with the accumulation of genetic alterations (Murphy et al., 2013), including activating mutations in the KRAS oncogene which appears in ~90% of PDACs as well as inactivating mutations in tumor suppressors genes, including p53, p16, and SMAD4 (Murphy et al., 2013). It is generally accepted that progression of pancreatic carcinogenesis requires dysregulation of a set of signaling pathways leading to sustained cell proliferation (Jones et al., 2008). The focus of this brief article is on the central role of the mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in mediating insulin/IGF-1 and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling leading to proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Subsequently, strategies to target this pathway in PDAC cells are proposed.

Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and PDAC

In addition to smoking, chronic pancreatitis and a family history of PDAC (Kolodecik et al., 2014), many epidemiological studies have linked obesity and long-standing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with increased risk and worse clinical outcomes for developing PDAC (Arslan et al., 2010; Giovannucci et al., 2010). These diet-related metabolic disorders are multifaceted but characterized by peripheral insulin resistance, compensatory overproduction of insulin and increased bioavailability of IGF-1 (Alemán et al., 2014). Given the complex organization of the pancreatic microcirculation, locally overproduced insulin by β cells is thought to act directly on insulin receptors expressed by exocrine pancreatic cells. The highly related insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor (IGF-1R) and hybrids of IGF-1R and insulin receptors can also be activated by insulin (Taniguchi et al., 2006), in particular at the high concentrations of intra-pancreatic insulin. Accordingly, PDAC cells express insulin and IGF-1 receptors and over-express insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 and PDAC (but not normal) tissue expresses activated IGF-1R and IGF-1 (Rozengurt et al., 2010). Silencing the expression of IGF-1R in pancreatic cancer cells inhibits their growth and metastasis (Subramani et al., 2014) and the beneficial effects of calorie restriction in pancreatic cancer models appear mediated through the IGF-1/IGF-1R axis (Harvey et al., 2014). Reciprocally, the promoting effects of high calorie diet have been associated with an increase in the circulating levels of insulin and IGF-1 (Dawson et al., 2013). Interestingly, IGF-1 and orthotopically transplanted PDAC growth were decreased in liver-specific IGF-1-deficient mice and restored by IGF-1 administration (Lashinger et al., 2013). Inactivation of p53, as seen during the progression of 50–75% of PDAC, has been recognized to potently up-regulate the insulin/IGF-1 pathway (Feng and Levine, 2010) and gene variations in the IGF-1 signaling system have been associated with worse survival in PDAC (Dong et al., 2010). Collectively, these studies underscore the significance of the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway in PDAC development. Accordingly, elucidation of the signaling pathways triggered by insulin/IGF-1 and the crosstalk mechanisms between the insulin/IGF-1R and other signaling pathways in PDAC cells is likely to facilitate the identification of new targets for therapeutic and chemo-preventive interventions.

Insulin/IGF-1 signaling, PI3K/Akt/mTOR and PDAC

In most cells, binding of insulin to its tetrameric receptor induces activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase and autophosphorylation, followed by docking and tyrosine phosphorylation of adaptor proteins, including insulin receptor substrates (IRS 1–4) and Shc which propagate downstream signals (Metz and McGarry Houghton, 2011). The insulin receptor exhibits a high degree of homology with the IGF-1R, especially in their tyrosine kinase domains. Furthermore, the insulin and IGF-1 receptors form heterodimers that bind IGF-2, another ligand of the IGF family produced by cancer cells. As illustrated in Figure 1, a key insulin/IGF1R-induced pathway via IRS is class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mTOR (Taniguchi et al., 2006; Zoncu et al., 2011). PI3K catalyzes the synthesis of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3), a membrane lipid second messenger that coordinates the localization and activation of downstream effectors, including the isoforms of the Akt family (Franke, 2008). The Akts possess a PH domain and conserved residues (Thr308 and Ser473 in Akt1, the most commonly expressed isoform in normal cells) which are critical for Akt activation. Specifically, Akt translocated to the plasma membrane in response to products of PI3K, is activated by phosphorylation at Thr308 in the kinase activation loop and at Ser473 in the hydrophobic motif. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway plays a pivotal role in promoting the proliferation and survival of PDAC cells (Asano et al., 2005), is activated in pancreatic cancer tissues, and limits catabolic processes, including autophagy (Lee et al., 2010). Interestingly, the Akt2 gene is amplified or activated in a subset of pancreatic carcinomas (Ruggeri et al., 1998). Collectively, these findings imply that mTOR signaling plays an important role in obesity-induced pancreatic cancer and is a potential target for chemoprevention.

mTOR, a master regulator of cell metabolism, growth and proliferation, functions as a catalytic subunit in two distinct multi-protein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2 (Beauchamp and Platanias, 2013). mTORC1, characterized by the substrate binding subunit Raptor senses both nutrients and growth factors (Dibble and Manning, 2013). As indicated in Figure 1, mTORC1 phosphorylates and controls at least two regulators of protein synthesis, the 40S ribosomal protein subunit S6 kinase (S6K) and the inhibitor of protein synthesis 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) which promote protein synthesis and plays a critical role in the regulation of cellular metabolism (Dibble and Manning, 2013). mTORC1 is acutely inhibited by rapamycin whereas mTORC2, which is characterized by Rictor and mSin1, is not inhibited by short-term treatment with this agent.

The heterodimer of the tumor suppressor tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2; tuberin) and TSC1 (hamartin) represses mTORC1 signaling by acting as the GTPase-activator protein for the small G protein Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain), a potent activator of mTORC1 in its GTP-bound state. Phosphorylation of TSC2 by Akt and/or ERK/p90RSK (at different sites) uncouples TSC1/TSC2 from Rheb, leading to Rheb-GTP accumulation and mTORC1 activation (Figure 1). The Rag GTPases (RAGA/B and RAGC/D), in conjunction with the adaptor Ragulator, activate mTORC1 in response to amino acids, by promoting mTORC1 translocation to lysosomal membranes that contain Rheb-GTP (Bar-Peled and Sabatini, 2014). Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) opposes PI3K by degrading PIP3 to PIP2 thereby inactivating Akt and mTOR signaling (Song et al., 2012). The adaptor protein Shc binds to autophosphorylated IGF-1R to stimulate Grb2/SOS-mediated Ras activation (GTP loading) leading to Raf/MEK/ERK activation (Figure 1). As will be discussed below, insulin/IGF-1-induced signaling cross-talks with pathways triggered through other receptors systems expressed by PDAC cells thereby forming complex networks.

In addition to be phosphorylated at multiple Tyr residues that promote downstream signaling, the IRS family is also phosphorylated at multiple serine and threonine residues that attenuate signaling and promote degradation. In this context, it is important that activation of the mTORC1/S6K axis inhibits IRS-1 function following its phosphorylation at multiple residues, including Ser636/639 by mTORC1 and Ser307/636/1001 by S6K (Tanti and Jager, 2009). Accordingly, treatment of PDAC cells with rapamycin caused a striking increase in Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 while exposure to active-site inhibitors of mTOR (e.g., KU63794 and PP242) abrogated Akt phosphorylation at this site in PDAC cells (Soares et al., 2013). Conversely, active-site inhibitors of mTOR caused a marked increase in ERK activation whereas rapamycin did not have any stimulatory effect on ERK activation in PDAC cells (Soares et al., 2013). These results imply that first and second generation of mTOR inhibitors promote over-activation of different pro-oncogenic pathways in PDAC cells, suggesting that suppression of feed-back loops should be a major consideration in the use of these inhibitors for PDAC therapy.

Crosstalk between insulin/IGF-1 receptor and G protein-coupled receptor signaling systems in PDAC

Many studies support the notion that crosstalk between the insulin receptor and heptahelical GPCR signaling systems is implicated in a variety of normal and abnormal processes, including cardiovascular and renal pathologies in obesity, metabolic syndrome and T2DM. Many GPCRs and their cognate agonists also mediate autocrine/paracrine growth stimulation in a variety of cancer cells and dramatically synergize with insulin/IGF-1 in inducing mitogenic signaling (Rozengurt, 1986). A recent characterization of cancer genomes demonstrated frequent mutations in GPCRs and G proteins (Kan et al., 2010). Consequently, we hypothesized that crosstalk between insulin/IGF-1 receptor and GPCR signaling systems is also a mechanism for enhancing the development of pancreatic cancer (Rozengurt et al., 2010). Accordingly, PDAC cells and tissues express multiple mitogenic GPCRs, including receptors that recognize neurotensin, angiotensin II and substance P (Rozengurt et al., 2010) and a broad-spectrum GPCR antagonist inhibited the growth of PDAC cells in vivo (Guha et al., 2005). Using PDAC cells in culture, we demonstrated positive crosstalk between insulin receptor and GPCR signaling systems (Kisfalvi et al., 2009).

Many GPCRs activate G proteins of the Gq family, promoting its dissociation into Gαq and Gβ γ and the exchange of GDP bound to Gαq for GTP (Rozengurt, 2007). The resulting GTP-Gαq complex activates the β isoforms of phospholipase C (PLC), identified as one of the “core” signaling pathways that undergo somatic alterations in nearly all pancreatic cancers (Jones et al., 2008). As shown in Figure 2, PLCβ produces second messengers that activate members of the protein kinase C (PKC) family which, in turn, phosphorylate and activate the protein kinases of the protein kinase D (PKD) family, including PKD1, PKD2, and PKD3 (Rozengurt et al., 2005). The PKC/PKD axis induces MEK/ERK/p90RSK activation, at least in part by direct phosphorylation of RIN1 and thereby potentiates K-Ras signaling (Rozengurt et al., 2005). In addition, PKDs can promote COX-2-mediated production of PGE2 which can bind to their own receptors after exiting the cells (Figure 2). PKDs are rapidly activated by GPCR agonists in PDAC cells (Guha et al., 2002; Rey et al., 2003a,b; Yuan and Rozengurt, 2008), are over-expressed in PDAC tissues (Harikumar et al., 2010) and PKD over-expression in PDAC cell lines promotes their proliferation (Kisfalvi et al., 2010) and invasion (Ochi et al., 2011). Furthermore, a novel PKD inhibitor blocks pancreatic cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo (Harikumar et al., 2010).

GPCR agonists also stimulate mTORC1 through at least two converging mechanisms: EGFR transactivation and ERK-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 (Rozengurt, 2007; Foster and Fingar, 2010; Rozengurt et al., 2010). Transactivation of the EGFR is mediated by the rapid generation of EGFR ligands through proteolysis of membrane-bound precursors proteins and via intracellular phosphorylation of EGFR mediated by Src (Santiskulvong and Rozengurt, 2007). The importance of EGFR has been demonstrated in transgenic mice models in which pancreas-specific deletion of EGFR prevented Kras-induced development of PDAC (Ardito et al., 2012).

We hypothesize that the concomitant activation of PI3K/Akt (through insulin/IGF-1 and EGF receptors), PKD/ERK (via agonist-induced Gq signaling) and mTORC1 (synergistically through PI3K/Akt induced by insulin/IGF-1R and EGFR and GPCR-stimulated ERK/p90RSK) in PDAC cells potently stimulates DNA synthesis and proliferation of these cancer cells, and thus provide potential targets for chemotherapeutic intervention (Figure 2). Since both the ERK and PI3K pathways are effectors of KRAS, activating mutations of KRAS reinforce the crosstalk between insulin/IGF-1 receptor and GPCR signaling systems, thereby increasing the robustness of the network induced by insulin/IGF-1 and GPCR agonists in pancreatic cancer cells.

Metformin, AMPK, and PDAC

Metformin (1,1-dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride) is the most widely prescribed drug for treatment of T2DM worldwide. Although it has been in clinical use for decades, its precise molecular mechanism of action remains incompletely understood. The primary systemic effect of metformin is the lowering of blood glucose levels through reduced hepatic gluconeogenesis and improved insulin sensitivity by increasing glucose uptake in peripheral tissues, including skeletal muscles and adipose tissue (Shaw et al., 2005). Metformin also reduces the circulating levels of insulin and IGF-1 in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients (Berker et al., 2004; Goodwin et al., 2008).

At the cellular level, metformin indirectly stimulates AMP–activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation (Hawley et al., 2010), though other cellular mechanisms of action have been proposed, especially at high concentrations (Sahra et al., 2008; Kalender et al., 2010). Metformin does not act directly on AMPK but inhibits complex I activity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (El-Mir et al., 2000; Owen et al., 2000), resulting in reduced ATP synthesis and increase in cellular AMP and ADP. AMPK is a conserved sensor of cellular energy being activated when ATP concentrations decrease and 5′-AMP concentrations increase (Kahn et al., 2005; Oakhill et al., 2011). Interestingly, AMPK is also implicated in the regulation of epithelial cell polarity (Mirouse et al., 2007), which is lost in advanced PanINs (Hingorani et al., 2003).

AMPK exists as a heterotrimer, composed of the catalytic kinase α subunit and two regulatory subunits, β and γ (Kahn et al., 2005). AMP directly binds to the AMPK γ subunit, causing allosteric activation and preventing dephosphorylation of Thr172 in the activation loop of the α subunit (Gowans et al., 2013). The tumor suppressor LKB-1/STK11 (Liver kinase B1/serine–threonine kinase 11) is the major kinase phosphorylating the AMPK activation loop. LKB-1/STK11 is mutated in the Peutz-Jegher syndrome (Kahn et al., 2005), characterized by predisposition to GI neoplasms, including PDAC.

AMPK is thought to inhibit mTORC1 function at three levels: (1) AMPK stimulates TSC2 function via phosphorylation on Ser1345 (Inoki et al., 2003, 2006; Shaw et al., 2004), leading to accumulation of Rheb-GDP (the inactive form) and thereby to inhibition of mTORC1 activation; (2) AMPK inhibits mTORC1 by direct phosphorylation of Raptor (on Ser722 and Ser792), which disrupts its association with mTOR (Gwinn et al., 2008); (3) Insulin/IGF-1-induced mTORC1 activation is also attenuated by AMPK by direct phosphorylation of IRS-1 on Ser794, a site that interferes with PI3K activation (Tzatsos and Tsichlis, 2007; Ning and Clemmons, 2010). Metformin, at high concentrations, also inhibits mTORC1 via AMPK-independent pathways, targeting Rag GTPases and/or REDD1 (Kalender et al., 2010; Ben Sahra et al., 2011). Since mTORC1 is a key site of signaling crosstalk in PDAC cells, we examined whether metformin opposes positive crosstalk between insulin/IGF-1 receptors and GPCR signaling systems in these cells.

In designing mechanistic experiments with metformin or other inhibitors of mitochondrial respiration such as the natural alkaloid berberine, it is important to use physiological concentrations of glucose in the culture medium. Cancer cells use aerobic glycolysis when the glucose concentration in the medium is very high but retain significant capacity of oxidative phosphorylation (Rossignol et al., 2004; Imamura et al., 2009; Vander Heiden et al., 2009). Thus, when cultured in regular DMEM (which contains 25 mM glucose), cells derive most of the ATP from glycolysis. In contrast, when the concentration of ambient glucose is physiological (~5 mM) and glucose uptake rates are lower, cells derive part of their ATP from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (Vazquez et al., 2010) and hence, are more sensitive to mild inhibitors of mitochondrial function, like metformin. Our results demonstrated that metformin prevented mTORC1 signaling in PDAC cells (Kisfalvi et al., 2009) and that the inhibitory effect of low doses of metformin on mTORC1 was markedly enhanced when PDAC cells were cultured in medium containing physiological concentrations of glucose (Sinnett-Smith et al., 2013; Soares et al., 2013). In this context, most previous studies in vitro with multiple cell types have used high concentrations of this agent to elicit effects [e.g., 5–30 mM], a condition that can lead to off-target effects. In addition to inhibit mTORC1, our results demonstrated that metformin prevented ERK activation in PDAC cells (Soares et al., 2013). Interestingly, the effects of metformin on Akt and ERK activation are strikingly different from allosteric or active-site mTOR inhibitors in PDAC cells, though all these agents potently inhibited the mTORC1/S6K axis (Soares et al., 2013). Furthermore, administration of metformin inhibited the growth of aggressive PDAC cells in xenograft models (Kisfalvi et al., 2013). Collectively, these studies imply that metformin inhibits mitogenic signaling, including mTORC1, ERK, and proliferation in PDAC cells and raise the attractive possibility that this anti-diabetic agent could offer a novel approach for the chemoprevention of PDAC (Rozengurt et al., 2010; Yue et al., 2014).

In line with this possibility, a number of epidemiological studies suggested a link between administration of metformin and reduced incidence of a variety of cancers in T2DM patients, including PDAC (Li et al., 2009; DeCensi et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2011; Bodmer et al., 2012; Franciosi et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013). Interestingly, metformin use in T2DM patients with PDAC was associated to better survival (Sadeghi et al., 2012). However, a meta-analysis of nine observational studies showed a trend but failed to show a significant association between metformin and PDAC risk (Singh et al., 2013). Methodological limitations and biases that potentially exaggerate the beneficial effects of metformin in observational studies have been identified (Gandini et al., 2014). In any case, epidemiological associations do not establish causation, but support the need for understanding mechanism(s) of action and for prospective clinical studies. For example, it will be of great interest to test anti-cancer effects of metformin on PDAC cells with complex I mutations that render them hypersensitive to inhibitors (Birsoy et al., 2014).

The elucidation of the mechanism(s) by which metformin targets cancer cells is key for advancing the field as can lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including the identification of specific patient populations that ultimately will benefit from metformin administration, the generation of preliminary biomarker evidence of target inhibition, will stimulate the development of second generation drugs and the design of combinatorial interventions.

Conflict of interest statement

The Associate Editor Guido Eibl declares that, despite having collaborated with the author Enrique Rozengurt, the review process was handled objectively and no conflict of interest exists. The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The studies in the laboratory of Enrique Rozengurt are supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P30DK41301 and P01CA163200, Department of Veterans Affair Grant 1I01BX001473 and funds from the endowed Ronald S. Hirschberg Chair of Pancreatic Cancer Research. ( The funders had no role in the preparation of the manuscript.

Alemán J. O.,Eusebi L. H.,Ricciardiello L.,Patidar K.,Sanyal A. J.,Holt P. R.. (Year: 2014). Mechanisms of obesity-induced gastrointestinal neoplasia. Gastroenterology146, 357–37310.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.05124315827
Ardito C. M.,Grüner B. M.,Takeuchi K. K.,Lubeseder-Martellato C.,Teichmann N.,Mazur P. K.,et al. (Year: 2012). EGF Receptor is required for KRAS-induced pancreatic tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell22, 304–31710.1016/j.ccr.2012.07.02422975374
Arslan A. A.,Helzlsouer K. J.,Kooperberg C.,Shu X.-O.,Steplowski E.,Bueno-de-Mesquita H. B.,et al. (Year: 2010). Anthropometric measures, body mass index, and pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan). Arch. Intern. Med. 170, 791–80210.1001/archinternmed.2010.6320458087
Asano T.,Yao Y.,Shin S.,McCubrey J.,Abbruzzese J. L.,Reddy S. A.. (Year: 2005). Insulin receptor substrate is a mediator of phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation in quiescent pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 65, 9164–916810.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-077916230374
Bar-Peled L.,Sabatini D. M.. (Year: 2014). Regulation of mTORC1 by amino acids. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 400–40610.1016/j.tcb.2014.03.00324698685
Beauchamp E. M.,Platanias L. C.. (Year: 2013). The evolution of the TOR pathway and its role in cancer. Oncogene32, 3923–393210.1038/onc.2012.56723246968
Ben Sahra I.,Regazzetti C.,Robert G.,Laurent K.,Le Marchand-Brustel Y.,Auberger P.,et al. (Year: 2011). Metformin, independent of AMPK, induces mTOR inhibition and cell-cycle arrest through REDD1. Cancer Res. 71, 4366–437210.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-176921540236
Berker B.,Emral R.,Demirel C.,Corapcioglu D.,Unlu C.,Kose K.. (Year: 2004). Increased insulin-like growth factor-I levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and beneficial effects of metformin therapy. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 19, 125–13310.1080/0951359040000730915697073
Birsoy K.,Possemato R.,Lorbeer F. K.,Bayraktar E. C.,Thiru P.,Yucel B.,et al. (Year: 2014). Metabolic determinants of cancer cell sensitivity to glucose limitation and biguanides. Nature508, 108–11210.1038/nature1311024670634
Bodmer M.,Becker C.,Meier C.,Jick S. S.,Meier C. R.. (Year: 2012). Use of antidiabetic agents and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a case-control analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 107, 620–62610.1038/ajg.2011.48322290402
Dawson D. W.,Hertzer K.,Moro A.,Donald G.,Chang H. H.,Go V. L.,et al. (Year: 2013). High fat, high calorie diet promotes early pancreatic neoplasia in the conditional KrasG12D mouse model. Cancer Prev. Res. 6, 1064–107310.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-006523943783
DeCensi A.,Puntoni M.,Goodwin P.,Cazzaniga M.,Gennari A.,Bonanni B.,et al. (Year: 2010). Metformin and cancer risk in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Prev. Res. 3, 1451–146110.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-015720947488
Dibble C. C.,Manning B. D.. (Year: 2013). Signal integration by mTORC1 coordinates nutrient input with biosynthetic output. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 555–56410.1038/ncb276323728461
Dong X.,Javle M.,Hess K. R.,Shroff R.,Abbruzzese J. L.,Li D.. (Year: 2010). Insulin-like growth factor axis gene polymorphisms and clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology139, 464–47310.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.04220416304
El-Mir M. Y.,Nogueira V.,Fontaine E.,Averet N.,Rigoulet M.,Leverve X.. (Year: 2000). Dimethylbiguanide inhibits cell respiration via an indirect effect targeted on the respiratory chain complex I. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 223–22810.1074/jbc.275.1.22310617608
Feng Z.,Levine A. J.. (Year: 2010). The regulation of energy metabolism and the IGF-1/mTOR pathways by the p53 protein. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 427–43410.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.00420399660
Foster K. G.,Fingar D. C.. (Year: 2010). Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR): conducting the cellular signaling symphony. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14071–1407710.1074/jbc.R109.09400320231296
Franciosi M.,Lucisano G.,Lapice E.,Strippoli G. F.,Pellegrini F.,Nicolucci A.. (Year: 2013). Metformin therapy and risk of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review. PLoS ONE8:e7158310.1371/journal.pone.007158323936520
Franke T. F.. (Year: 2008). PI3K/Akt: getting it right matters. Oncogene27, 6473–648810.1038/onc.2008.31318955974
Gandini S.,Puntoni M.,Heckman-Stoddard B. M.,Dunn B. K.,Ford L.,DeCensi A.,et al. (Year: 2014). Metformin and cancer risk and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis taking into account biases and confounders. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila)7, 867–88510.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-042424985407
Giovannucci E.,Harlan D. M.,Archer M. C.,Bergenstal R. M.,Gapstur S. M.,Habel L. A.,et al. (Year: 2010). Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. CA Cancer J. Clin. 60, 207–22110.3322/caac.2007820554718
Goodwin P.,Pritchard K.,Ennis M.,Clemons M.,Graham M.,Fantus I. G.. (Year: 2008). Insulin-lowering effects of metformin in women with early breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer8:50110.3816/CBC.2008.n.06019073504
Gowans G. J.,Hawley S. A.,Ross F. A.,Hardie D. G.. (Year: 2013). AMP is a true physiological regulator of AMP-activated protein kinase by both allosteric activation and enhancing net phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 18, 556–56610.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.01924093679
Guha S.,Eibl G.,Kisfalvi K.,Fan R. S.,Burdick M.,Reber H.,et al. (Year: 2005). Broad-spectrum G protein-coupled receptor antagonist, [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP: a dual inhibitor of growth and angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 65, 2738–274510.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-319715805273
Guha S.,Rey O.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2002). Neurotensin induces protein kinase C-dependent protein kinase D activation and DNA synthesis in human pancreatic carcinoma cell line PANC-1. Cancer Res. 62, 1632–164011912133
Gwinn D. M.,Shackelford D. B.,Egan D. F.,Mihaylova M. M.,Mery A.,Vasquez D. S.,et al. (Year: 2008). AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol. Cell30, 214–22610.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.00318439900
Harikumar K. B.,Kunnumakkara A. B.,Ochi N.,Tong Z.,Deorukhkar A.,Sung B.,et al. (Year: 2010). A novel small-molecule inhibitor of protein kinase D blocks pancreatic cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 1136–114610.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-114520442301
Harvey A. E.,Lashinger L. M.,Hays D.,Harrison L. M.,Lewis K.,Fischer S. M.,et al. (Year: 2014). Calorie restriction decreases murine and human pancreatic tumor cell growth, nuclear factor-κb activation, and inflammation-related gene expression in an insulin-like growth factor-1-dependent manner. PLoS ONE9:e9415110.1371/journal.pone.009415124804677
Hawley S. A.,Ross F. A.,Chevtzoff C.,Green K. A.,Evans A.,Fogarty S.,et al. (Year: 2010). Use of cells expressing gamma subunit variants to identify diverse mechanisms of AMPK activation. Cell Metab. 11, 554–56510.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.00120519126
Hingorani S. R.,Petricoin E. F.,Maitra A.,Rajapakse V.,King C.,Jacobetz M. A.,et al. (Year: 2003). Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell4, 437–45010.1016/S1535-6108(03)00309-X14706336
Imamura H.,Huynh Nhat K. P.,Togawa H.,Saito K.,Iino R.,Kato-Yamada Y.,et al. (Year: 2009). Visualization of ATP levels inside single living cells with fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based genetically encoded indicators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 15651–1565610.1073/pnas.090476410619720993
Inoki K.,Ouyang H.,Zhu T.,Lindvall C.,Wang Y.,Zhang X.,et al. (Year: 2006). TSC2 integrates Wnt and energy signals via a coordinated phosphorylation by AMPK and GSK3 to regulate cell growth. Cell126, 955–96810.1016/j.cell.2006.06.05516959574
Inoki K.,Zhu T.,Guan K. L.. (Year: 2003). TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell115, 577–59010.1016/S0092-8674(03)00929-214651849
Jones S.,Zhang X.,Parsons D. W.,Lin J. C.,Leary R. J.,Angenendt P.,et al. (Year: 2008). Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Science321, 1801–180610.1126/science.116436818772397
Kahn B. B.,Alquier T.,Carling D.,Hardie D. G.. (Year: 2005). AMP-activated protein kinase: ancient energy gauge provides clues to modern understanding of metabolism. Cell Metab. 1, 15–2510.1016/j.cmet.2004.12.00316054041
Kalender A.,Selvaraj A.,Kim S. Y.,Gulati P.,Brulé S.,Viollet B.,et al. (Year: 2010). Metformin, independent of AMPK, inhibits mTORC1 in a rag GTPase-dependent manner. Cell Metabol. 11, 390–40110.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.01420444419
Kan Z.,Jaiswal B. S.,Stinson J.,Janakiraman V.,Bhatt D.,Stern H. M.,et al. (Year: 2010). Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers. Nature466, 869–87310.1038/nature0920820668451
Kisfalvi K.,Eibl G.,Sinnett-Smith J.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2009). Metformin disrupts crosstalk between G protein-coupled receptor and insulin receptor signaling systems and inhibits pancreatic cancer growth. Cancer Res. 69, 6539–654510.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-041819679549
Kisfalvi K.,Hurd C.,Guha S.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2010). Induced overexpression of protein kinase D1 stimulates mitogenic signaling in human pancreatic carcinoma PANC-1 cells. J. Cell Physiol. 223, 309–31610.1002/jcp.2203620082306
Kisfalvi K.,Moro A.,Sinnett-Smith J.,Eibl G.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2013). Metformin inhibits the growth of human pancreatic cancer xenografts. Pancreas42, 781–78510.1097/MPA.0b013e31827aec4023462329
Kolodecik T.,Shugrue C.,Ashat M.,Thrower E. C.. (Year: 2014). Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: underlying mechanisms and potential targets. Front. Physiol. 4:41510.3389/fphys.2013.0041524474939
Lashinger L. M.,Harrison L. M.,Rasmussen A. J.,Logsdon C. D.,Fischer S. M.,McArthur M. J.,et al. (Year: 2013). Dietary energy balance modulation of Kras- and Ink4a/Arf+/–driven pancreatic cancer: the role of insulin-like growth factor-I. Cancer Prev. Res. 6, 1046–105510.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-018523980075
Lee J. W.,Park S.,Takahashi Y.,Wang H.-G.. (Year: 2010). The association of AMPK with ULK1 regulates autophagy. PLoS ONE5:e1539410.1371/journal.pone.001539421072212
Lee M. S.,Hsu C. C.,Wahlqvist M. L.,Tsai H. N.,Chang Y. H.,Huang Y. C.. (Year: 2011). Type 2 diabetes increases and metformin reduces total, colorectal, liver and pancreatic cancer incidences in Taiwanese: a representative population prospective cohort study of 800,000 individuals. BMC Cancer11:2010.1186/1471-2407-11-2021241523
Li D.,Yeung S.-C. J.,Hassan M. M.,Konopleva M.,Abbruzzese J. L.. (Year: 2009). Anti-diabetic therapies affect risk of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology137, 482–48810.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.01319375425
Metz H. E.,McGarry Houghton A.. (Year: 2011). Insulin receptor substrate regulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 206–21110.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-043420966354
Mirouse V.,Swick L. L.,Kazgan N.,St Johnston D.,Brenman J. E.. (Year: 2007). LKB1 and AMPK maintain epithelial cell polarity under energetic stress. J. Cell Biol. 177, 387–39210.1083/jcb.20070205317470638
Murphy S. J.,Hart S. N.,Lima J. F.,Kipp B. R.,Klebig M.,Winters J. L.,et al. (Year: 2013). Genetic alterations associated with progression from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia to invasive pancreatic tumor. Gastroenterology145, 1098–1109e1091. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.07.04923912084
Ning J.,Clemmons D. R.. (Year: 2010). AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits IGF-I signaling and protein synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells via stimulation of insulin receptor substrate 1 S794 and tuberous sclerosis 2 S1345 phosphorylation. Mol. Endocrinol. 24, 1218–122910.1210/me.2009-047420363874
Oakhill J. S.,Steel R.,Chen Z.-P.,Scott J. W.,Ling N.,Tam S.,et al. (Year: 2011). AMPK Is a direct adenylate charge-regulated protein kinase. Science332, 1433–143510.1126/science.120009421680840
Ochi N.,Tanasanvimon S.,Matsuo Y.,Tong Z.,Sung B.,Aggarwal B. B.,et al. (Year: 2011). Protein kinase D1 promotes anchorage-independent growth, invasion, and angiogenesis by human pancreatic cancer cells. J. Cell Physiol. 226, 1074–108110.1002/jcp.2242120857418
Owen M. R.,Doran E.,Halestrap A. P.. (Year: 2000). Evidence that metformin exerts its anti-diabetic effects through inhibition of complex 1 of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Biochem. J. 348, 607–61410.1042/0264-6021:348060710839993
Rahib L.,Smith B. D.,Aizenberg R.,Rosenzweig A. B.,Fleshman J. M.,Matrisian L. M.. (Year: 2014). Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 74, 2913–292110.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-015524840647
Rey O.,Yuan J.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2003a). Intracellular redistribution of protein kinase D2 in response to G- protein-coupled receptor agonists. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 302, 817–82410.1016/S0006-291X(03)00269-912646243
Rey O.,Yuan J.,Young S. H.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2003b). Protein kinase C nu/protein kinase D3 nuclear localization, catalytic activation, and intracellular redistribution in response to G protein-coupled receptor agonists. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23773–2378510.1074/jbc.M30022620012676944
Rossignol R.,Gilkerson R.,Aggeler R.,Yamagata K.,Remington S. J.,Capaldi R. A.. (Year: 2004). Energy substrate modulates mitochondrial structure and oxidative capacity in cancer cells. Cancer. Res. 64, 985–99310.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-110114871829
Rozengurt E.. (Year: 1986). Early signals in the mitogenic response. Science234, 161–16610.1126/science.30189283018928
Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2007). Mitogenic signaling pathways induced by G protein-coupled receptors. J. Cell. Physiol. 213, 589–60210.1002/jcp.2124617786953
Rozengurt E.,Rey O.,Waldron R. T.. (Year: 2005). Protein kinase D signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 13205–1320810.1074/jbc.R50000220015701647
Rozengurt E.,Sinnett-Smith J.,Kisfalvi K.. (Year: 2010). Crosstalk between insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors and G protein-coupled receptor signaling systems: a novel target for the antidiabetic drug metformin in pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 2505–251110.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-222920388847
Ruggeri B. A.,Huang L.,Wood M.,Cheng J. Q.,Testa J. R.. (Year: 1998). Amplification and overexpression of the AKT2 oncogene in a subset of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Mol. Carcinog. 21, 81–869496907
Sadeghi N.,Abbruzzese J. L.,Yeung S.-C. J.,Hassan M.,Li D.. (Year: 2012). Metformin use is associated with better survival of diabetic patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer. Res. 18, 2905–291210.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-299422465831
Sahra I. B.,Laurent K.,Loubat A.,Giorgetti-Peraldi S.,Colosetti P.,Auberger P.,et al. (Year: 2008). The antidiabetic drug metformin exerts an antitumoral effect in vitro and in vivo through a decrease of cyclin D1 level. Oncogene27:357610.1038/sj.onc.121102418212742
Santiskulvong C.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2007). Protein kinase Calpha mediates feedback inhibition of EGF receptor transactivation induced by G(q)-coupled receptor agonists. Cell Signal. 19, 1348–135710.1016/j.cellsig.2007.01.00617307332
Shaw R. J.,Bardeesy N.,Manning B. D.,Lopez L.,Kosmatka M.,DePinho R. A.,et al. (Year: 2004). The LKB1 tumor suppressor negatively regulates mTOR signaling. Cancer Cell6, 91–9910.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.00715261145
Shaw R. J.,Lamia K. A.,Vasquez D.,Koo S. H.,Bardeesy N.,Depinho R. A.,et al. (Year: 2005). The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science310, 1642–164610.1126/science.112078116308421
Siegel R.,Ma J.,Zou Z.,Jemal A.. (Year: 2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 64, 9–2910.3322/caac.2120824399786
Singh S.,Singh P. P.,Singh A. G.,Murad M. H.,McWilliams R. R.,Chari S. T.. (Year: 2013). Anti-diabetic medications and risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 510–51910.1038/ajg.2013.723399556
Sinnett-Smith J.,Kisfalvi K.,Kui R.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2013). Metformin inhibition of mTORC1 activation, DNA synthesis and proliferation in pancreatic cancer cells: dependence on glucose concentration and role of AMPK. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430, 352–352710.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.01023159620
Soares H. P.,Ni Y.,Kisfalvi K.,Sinnett-Smith J.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2013). Different patterns of Akt and ERK feedback activation in response to rapamycin, active-site mTOR inhibitors and metformin in pancreatic cancer cells. PLoS ONE8:e5728910.1371/journal.pone.005728923437362
Song M. S.,Salmena L.,Pandolfi P. P.. (Year: 2012). The functions and regulation of the PTEN tumour suppressor. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 283–29610.1038/nrm333022473468
Subramani R.,Lopez-Valdez R.,Arumugam A.,Nandy S.,Boopalan T.,Lakshmanaswamy R.. (Year: 2014). Targeting insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor inhibits pancreatic cancer growth and metastasis. PLoS ONE9:e9701610.1371/journal.pone.009701624809702
Taniguchi C. M.,Emanuelli B.,Kahn C. R.. (Year: 2006). Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 85–9610.1038/nrm183716493415
Tanti J.-F.,Jager J.. (Year: 2009). Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance: role of stress-regulated serine kinases and insulin receptor substrates (IRS) serine phosphorylation. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 9, 753–76210.1016/j.coph.2009.07.00419683471
Tzatsos A.,Tsichlis P. N.. (Year: 2007). Energy depletion inhibits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling and induces apoptosis via AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of IRS-1 at Ser-794. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 18069–1808210.1074/jbc.M61010120017459875
Vander Heiden M. G.,Cantley L. C.,Thompson C. B.. (Year: 2009). Understanding the warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science324, 1029–103310.1126/science.116080919460998
Vazquez A.,Liu J.,Zhou Y.,Oltvai Z. N.. (Year: 2010). Catabolic efficiency of aerobic glycolysis: the Warburg effect revisited. BMC Syst. Biol. 4:5810.1186/1752-0509-4-5820459610
Yuan J.,Rozengurt E.. (Year: 2008). PKD, PKD2, and p38 MAPK mediate Hsp27 serine-82 phosphorylation induced by neurotensin in pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells. J. Cell Biochem. 103, 648–66210.1002/jcb.2143917570131
Yue W.,Yang C. S.,DiPaola R. S.,Tan X.-L.. (Year: 2014). Repurposing of metformin and aspirin by targeting AMPK-mTOR and inflammation for pancreatic cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer Prev. Res. 7, 388–39710.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-033724520038
Zhang P.,Li H.,Tan X.,Chen L.,Wang S.. (Year: 2013). Association of metformin use with cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 37, 207–21810.1016/j.canep.2012.12.00923352629
Zoncu R.,Efeyan A.,Sabatini D. M.. (Year: 2011). mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 21–3510.1038/nrm302521157483


[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathways. The receptors for the peptides of the insulin family peptides consist of ligand-binding α chain and tyrosine kinase-containing β chain (cartoons in the box). Insulin binds to the insulin receptors (InsR) with high affinity while it binds to IGF-1R at higher concentrations. Insulin also binds to hybrid receptors (IGF-1R/InsR). IGF-1 binds to the IGF-1R and to hybrid receptors with high affinity. IGF-2 binds to the InsR-A, IGF-1R, and IGF-1R/InsR-A hybrid receptor. For the sake clarity, negative feedback loops mediated by downstream components of the pathway (e.g., mTORC1, S6K) that restrain the activity of upstream components (e.g., IGF-1R, IRS) have not been included. The signaling network depicted in this figure is discussed in the text. Note that the IGF-1R and hybrid IGF-1R/InsRs couple more efficiently to Shc/Grb2/SOS providing an explanation for the increased ability of IGF-1 to induce ERK activation as compared with insulin. Green lines indicate stimulatory interactions while red lines indicate inhibitory interactions.

[Figure ID: F2]
Figure 2 

Crosstalk between insulin/IGF-1 receptors and GPCR signaling systems. The binding of an agonistic ligand to its cognate GPCR triggers the activation of multiple signal transduction pathways via heterotrimeric G proteins, including Gq/11. GPCRS also signal via arrestin (β-Arr) in a G protein-independent manner. A rapid increase in the activity of phospholipases C leads to the synthesis of lipid-derived second messengers, Ca2+ fluxes and subsequent activation of protein phosphorylation cascades, including PKC/PKD, Raf/MEK/ERK and Akt/mTOR/p70S6K. The EGFR has emerged as a transducer in the signaling by GPCRs, a process termed EGFR transactivation, and promoted by the release of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) through the activation of a disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM). The pathways stimulated by GPCRs are extensively interconnected by synergistic and antagonistic cross-talks that play a critical role in signal transmission, integration and dissemination. In this context, mTOR emerges as a critical point of convergence in the action of insulin/IGR-1R, EGFR, and GPCRs. Rapamycin, an allosteric inhibitor of mTORC1 and metformin, an inhibitor of mitochondrial function that indirectly (broken lines) stimulates AMPK, are also included.

Article Categories:
  • Physiology
    • Mini Review Article

Keywords: Akt, PI3K, PKC, S6 kinase, neurotensin.

Previous Document:  Remodeling of the heart in hypertrophy in animal models with myosin essential light chain mutations.
Next Document:  The efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in chronic intermittent hypoxia conditions.