Document Detail


Mechanisms of action of lumbar supports: a systematic review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10954643     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the putative mechanisms of action of lumbar supports in lifting activities. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence bearing on the putative mechanisms of action of lumbar supports. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A restriction of trunk motion and a reduction in required back muscle forces in lifting are two proposed mechanisms of action of lumbar supports. Available studies on these putative mechanisms of action of lumbar supports have reported contradictory results. METHODS: A literature search for controlled studies on mechanisms of action of lumbar supports was conducted. The methodologic quality of the studies was assessed. The evidence for the two proposed mechanisms of action of lumbar supports was determined in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were selected for the review. There was evidence that lumbar supports reduce trunk motion for flexion-extension and lateral bending, with overall effect sizes of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-1. 01) and 1.13 (95% CI 0.17-2.08), respectively. The overall effect size for rotation was not statistically significant (0.69; 95% CI -0. 40-4.31). There was no evidence that lumbar supports reduce the electromyogram activity of erector spinae muscles (effect size of 0. 09; 95% CI -0.41-0.59) or increase the intra-abdominal pressure (effect size of 0.26; 95% CI -0.07-0.59). CONCLUSION: There is evidence that lumbar supports reduce trunk motion for flexion-extension and lateral bending. More research is needed on the separate outcome measures for trunk motion before definite conclusions can be drawn about the work conditions in which lumbar supports may be most effective. Studies of trunk motion at the workplace or during specified lifting tasks would be especially useful in this regard.
Authors:
M N van Poppel; M P de Looze; B W Koes; T Smid; L M Bouter
Related Documents :
12567023 - The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
17996083 - Biomechanical simulations of the scoliotic deformation process in the pinealectomized c...
10378733 - Functions and sources of event-related eeg alpha oscillations studied with the wavelet ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Spine     Volume:  25     ISSN:  0362-2436     ISO Abbreviation:  Spine     Publication Date:  2000 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2000-09-21     Completed Date:  2000-09-21     Revised Date:  2009-07-09    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7610646     Medline TA:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2103-13     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine and Human Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. MNM.van_Poppel.EMGO@Med.VU.nl
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Back Injuries / etiology,  physiopathology,  prevention & control*
Braces / standards*
Female
Humans
Lifting / adverse effects*
Low Back Pain / etiology,  physiopathology,  prevention & control*
Lumbar Vertebrae / injuries*,  pathology,  physiopathology
Lumbosacral Region / injuries*,  pathology,  physiopathology
Male
Occupational Diseases / etiology,  physiopathology,  prevention & control

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale.
Next Document:  Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.