Document Detail

Mechanical ventilation and the total artificial heart: optimal ventilator trigger to avoid post-operative autocycling - a case series and literature review.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20478064     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Many patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy are now being implanted with Total Artificial Hearts (TAHs). We have observed individual cases of post-operative mechanical ventilator autocycling with a flow trigger, and subsequent loss of autocycling after switching to a pressure trigger. These observations prompted us to do a retrospective review of all TAH devices placed at our institution between August 2007 and May 2009. We found that in the immediate post-operative period following TAH placement, autocycling was present in 50% (5/10) of cases. There was immediate cessation of autocycling in all patients after being changed from a flow trigger of 2 L/minute to a pressure trigger of 2 cm H2O. The autocycling group was found to have significantly higher CVP values than the non-autocycling group (P = 0.012). Our data suggest that mechanical ventilator autocycling may be resolved or prevented by the use of a pressure trigger rather than a flow trigger setting in patients with TAHs who require mechanical ventilation.
Allen B Shoham; Bhavesh Patel; Francisco A Arabia; Michael J Murray
Related Documents :
3676054 - High frequency jet ventilation: the influence of different methods of injection on resp...
17996434 - Presence of cytokeratins in exhaled breath condensate of mechanical ventilated patients.
8955244 - Changes in oxygenation and compliance as related to body position in acute lung injury.
18156544 - Retention of mouth-to-mouth, mouth-to-mask and mouth-to-face shield ventilation.
20429314 - Diastolic blood pressure as a major determinant of tissue perfusion: potential clinical...
11537084 - Growth of plants at reduced pressures: experiments in wheat-technological advantages an...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-05-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cardiothoracic surgery     Volume:  5     ISSN:  1749-8090     ISO Abbreviation:  J Cardiothorac Surg     Publication Date:  2010  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-06-29     Completed Date:  2010-07-29     Revised Date:  2013-05-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101265113     Medline TA:  J Cardiothorac Surg     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  39     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Heart, Artificial*
Intubation, Intratracheal
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Pulmonary Ventilation
Respiration, Artificial / methods*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Cardiothorac Surg
ISSN: 1749-8090
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Copyright ©2010 Shoham et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 21 Month: 1 Year: 2010
Accepted Day: 17 Month: 5 Year: 2010
collection publication date: Year: 2010
Electronic publication date: Day: 17 Month: 5 Year: 2010
Volume: 5First Page: 39 Last Page: 39
Publisher Id: 1749-8090-5-39
PubMed Id: 20478064
DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-39

Mechanical ventilation and the total artificial heart: optimal ventilator trigger to avoid post-operative autocycling - a case series and literature review
Allen B Shoham1 Email:
Bhavesh Patel2 Email:
Francisco A Arabia3 Email:
Michael J Murray1 Email:
1Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA
2Department of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA
3Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA


In 2006, end-stage cardiomyopathy was the primary cause of death for almost 60,000 Americans[1]. Transplantation would have prevented many of these deaths; however, only 3205 patients worldwide received transplanted hearts in 2006[2]. Since the publication of the REMATCH study, [3] patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy have increasingly received total artificial hearts (TAHs) as a bridge to cadaveric cardiac transplantation, with surgeons currently implanting third-generation devices[4]. We must be diligent in maintaining our knowledge of these devices, as well as our skills in providing care to patients with TAHs.

After they have had a TAH implanted, patients typically remain tracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated for several days to weeks. While caring for such patients in our institution, we noticed that many developed postoperative autocycling of the mechanical ventilator when a flow trigger was used to initiate breaths (Figure 1), which subsequently stopped when we switched the ventilator to a pressure trigger (Figure 2). Autocycling refers to the inappropriate triggering of a ventilator assisted breath in the absence of a spontaneous patient effort. These observations piqued our curiosity regarding the frequency of this occurrence and precipitated the initiation of this retrospective chart review.


Following institutional review board approval, we reviewed the computerized medical records of all patients with a TAH placed at our institution between August 2007 and May 2009. We created a database using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and recorded the central venous pressure (CVP) while the patients were mechanically ventilated, the positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), mode of ventilation, body mass index (BMI), TAH rate, and both the set and actual respiratory rate while the patients' ventilators were set for both flow and pressure triggering. A 1-tailed equal variance student t test was done to compare the BMI and CVP values of the autocycling group and the non-autocycling group.

The medical records of 10 patients were identified for review (Table 1). All patients were older than 40 years of age; exact ages have not been included in this report because of the need for patient confidentiality. The artificial heart device used in all patients was the SynCardia CardioWest (Tucson, AZ). The mechanical ventilator used in all patients was the Puritan Bennett 840 (Pleasanton, CA).


Data from all 10 patients (Table 1) shows that 8 had a flow trigger of 2 L/minute as the initial ventilator setting, with a change in all 8 to a pressure trigger of 2 cm H2O within the first 48 hours after TAH placement. One patient was kept on a flow trigger of 2 L/minute until extubation without any autocycling noted, and another patient was kept on a pressure trigger of 2 cm H2O until extubation without any autocycling recorded.

Five of the 10 patients developed autocycling of the ventilator, but autocycling ceased immediately in all of these patients when their ventilator settings were changed from a flow trigger of 2 L/minute to a pressure trigger of 2 cm H2O. There were no documented changes in the patients' levels of sedation, mentation, or neuromuscular blockade when these changes were made.


A search of PubMed using the terms ventilation and artificial heart and autocycling and artificial heart on May 23, 2009, did not reveal any publications regarding autocycling associated with TAH devices, nor did we find a description of optimal mechanical ventilator settings for patients who have received a TAH or strategies to postoperatively manage the ventilators of such patients.

Potential consequences of mechanical ventilator autocycling include respiratory alkalosis, barotrauma, patient ventilator dysynchrony, and over use of sedative medications[5,6]. In 1 of our patients, the presence of autocycling resulted in evaluation and work-up for central hyperventilation syndrome. Such an evaluation typically includes invasive testing that could be potentially harmful to the patient.

Flow- and pressure-triggered mechanical ventilator modes are designed to allow and assist with spontaneous ventilation. In a pressure-trigger mode, the patient's inspiratory effort is recognized when the airway pressure decreases below the baseline level of PEEP by the set trigger sensitivity (2 cm H2O in our cases). Once this occurs, the ventilator delivers an assisted breath.

In a flow-trigger mode using the Puritan Bennett 840 mechanical ventilator, the baseline continuous expiratory flow is set at 1.5 L/min greater than the set flow trigger (2 L/min in our case), resulting in a continuous expiratory flow of 3.5 L/min. The patients' inspiratory effort is recognized as a drop in expiratory flow by the set trigger sensitivity, consequently resulting in a ventilator-assisted breath. In our case, this would occur when expiratory flow is less than 1.5 L/min.

Use of a flow trigger has been shown to decrease the inspiratory work of breathing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and intrinsic PEEP (iPEEP)[7]. In the case of iPEEP, the patient would have to produce a greater negative pressure to overcome the difference between intrinsic and circuit PEEP. However, with newer ventilator programming, the inspiratory work of breathing is similar between flow and pressure trigger modes[8,9].

Any device that alters resistance from the alveolus to the sensor at the y-piece, such as gas leaks from ventilator circuits, leaks in the cuff of the tracheal tube[5,10]. a heat moisture exchanger, [6] and an in-line catheter, can be a source of ventilator autocycling[11]. Cardiac oscillations are another well-known source of autocycling and have been described in patients in the ICU and during general anesthesia[12]. Cardiac oscillations leading to autocycling in patients who have undergone cardiac surgical procedures has been shown to be relatively common with flow-trigger settings, particularly in patients who have large cardiac outputs, large heart size, low respiratory system resistance, and an elevated CVP[13]. The differences we have observed in incidence of autocycling may not only reflect the method of triggering (flow vs. pressure), but also the sensitivity of the trigger used as the more sensitive the setting, the more likely autocycling will occur; flow-triggering has been shown to be particularly sensitive to circuit leaks[5,6,10,11].

The autocycling group in our case series did have significantly higher CVP values than the non-autocycling group (P = 0.012), though we can not draw any causative conclusions with this post hoc data. An elevated CVP may reflect decreased intra-thoracic compliance, thereby increasing transmitted pressure changes to the airway with resultant autocycling. The elevated CVP may also simply be a consequence of mechanical ventilator autocycling rather than a cause.

TAH oscillations induce significant pulmonary volume displacement as there are large pneumatic pressure changes for each beat[14,15]. A patient with post-operative respiratory failure after Jarvik-7 TAH placement showed significant lung displacement during apnea[15]. In fact, this patient's cardiac oscillations were large enough for sustained alveolar ventilation with an arterial pCO2 of 61 after one hour of total apnea. The Jarvik-7 TAH is the most recent structural cousin to our current CardioWest TAH device.

Why is it that autocycling occurred in 50% of our patients with a flow trigger but not with a pressure trigger? Modern mechanical ventilators maintain PEEP and compensate for changes in circuit pressure by adjusting the exhalation valve with an active microprocessor control throughout the expiratory period[16]. The microprocessor actively adjusts the expiratory valve to maintain a set PEEP, ultimately leading to subsequent changes in circuit flow. The result is that pressure is maintained at the expense of a change in flow. The CardioWest TAH initiates very large intra-thoracic pressure changes that, by definition, are transmitted to the airway. With a pressure trigger, PEEP maintenance may compensate for the TAH-induced pressure changes prior to a breath being triggered. With a flow trigger the microprocessor once again compensates for the pressure change induced by the cycling of the TAH. This compensation, leads to pressure maintenance at the expense of a change in flow, which may then trigger an autocycled breath if timed correctly.


In summary, autocycling of the mechanical ventilator occurred in 50% of patients who had received TAHs with the use of a flow trigger ventilator setting. Autocycling was resolved in all these patients by changing from a flow trigger to a pressure trigger ventilator setting. Mechanical ventilator PEEP maintenance maintains pressure at the expense of altered flow, ultimately leading to autocycling in the case of a flow trigger. Given the frequency of autocycling in the ICU, this information may be applicable to other patients who are mechanically ventilated. Because advanced ventilator software has significantly diminished differences in inspiratory work of breathing, physicians may consider using a pressure trigger as an initial ventilator mode, or switching to this mode in patients suspected of, or at high risk for autocycling.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AS reviewed the literature, drafted and completed the manuscript. BP and MM assisted in drafting and reviewing the manuscript. FA performed surgical interventions and reviewed the manuscript. Both FA and BP participated in post-operative management of patients studied. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We would like to thank Catherine F. Murray for generously volunteering her time to assist with drafting, editing and formatting this manuscript.

Lloyd-Jones D,Adams R,Carnethon M,De Simone G,Ferguson TB,Flegal K,Ford E,Furie K,Go A,Greenlund K,Heart disease and stroke statistics -- 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics SubcommitteeCirculationYear: 200911948048610.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.19125919171871
Hertz MI,Aurora P,Christie JD,Dobbels F,Edwards LB,Kirk R,Kucheryavaya AY,Rahmel AO,Rowe AW,Taylor DO,Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: a quarter century of thoracic transplantationJ Heart Lung TransplantYear: 20082793794210.1016/j.healun.2008.07.01918765185
Rose EA,Gelijns AC,Moskowitz AJ,Heitjan DF,Stevenson LW,Dembitsky W,Long JW,Ascheim DD,Tierney AR,Levitan RG,Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failureN Engl J MedYear: 20013451435144310.1056/NEJMoa01217511794191
Gray JNA,Selzman CH,Current status of the total artificial heartAmerican Heart JournalYear: 200615241010.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.02416824826
Chui PT,Joynt GM,Oh TE,Chui PT,Joynt GM,Oh TE,Severe hyperventilation and respiratory alkalosis during pressure-support ventilation: report of a hazardAnaesthesiaYear: 19955097898010.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05932.x8678256
Harboe S,Hjalmarsson S,Soreide E,Harboe S,Hjalmarsson S,Soreide E,Autocycling and increase in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure during mechanical ventilationActa Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaYear: 2001451295129710.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.451021.x11736686
Ranieri VM,Mascia L,Petruzzelli V,Bruno F,Brienza A,Giuliani R,Ranieri VM,Mascia L,Petruzzelli V,Bruno F,Inspiratory effort and measurement of dynamic intrinsic PEEP in COPD patients: effects of ventilator triggering systemsIntensive Care MedicineYear: 19952189690310.1007/BF017123308636521
Aslanian P,El Atrous S,Isabey D,Valente E,Corsi D,Harf A,Lemaire F,Brochard L,Effects of flow triggering on breathing effort during partial ventilatory supportAmerican Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care MedicineYear: 1998157135143
Tutuncu AS,Cakar N,Camci E,Esen F,Telci L,Akpir K,Comparison of pressure- and flow-triggered pressure-support ventilation on weaning parameters in patients recovering from acute respiratory failureCritical Care MedicineYear: 19972575676010.1097/00003246-199705000-000089187592
Schwab RJ,Schnader JS,Ventilator autocycling due to an endotracheal tube cuff leakChestYear: 19911001172117310.1378/chest.100.4.11721914588
Al-Khafaji A,Manning HL,Al-Khafaji A,Manning HL,Inappropriate ventilator triggering caused by an in-line suction catheterIntensive Care MedicineYear: 20022851551910.1007/s00134-002-1239-011967610
Coxon M,Sindhakar S,Hodzovic I,Coxon M,Sindhakar S,Hodzovic I,Autotriggering of pressure support ventilation during general anaesthesia.[see comment]AnaesthesiaYear: 200661727310.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04488.x16409358
Imanaka H,Nishimura M,Takeuchi M,Kimball WR,Yahagi N,Kumon K,Autotriggering caused by cardiogenic oscillation during flow-triggered mechanical ventilation.[see comment]Critical Care MedicineYear: 20002840240710.1097/00003246-200002000-0001910708174
Robotham JL,Mays JB,Williams M,DeVries WC,Cardiorespiratory Interactions in Patients with an Artificial HeartAnesthesiologyYear: 19907359960910.1097/00000542-199010000-000032221427
Rouby JJ,Leger P,Arthaud M,Devilliers C,Cabrol A,Gandjbakch I,Cabrol C,Viars P,Respiratory effects of the Jarvik-7 artificial heartJ Appl PhysiolYear: 1989661984198910.1063/1.3443362732189
Tobin MJ,Principals and Practice of Mechanical VentilationYear: 2006SecondMcGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division


[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

TAH induced autocycling is present with an actual RR of 28 using a flow trigger.

[Figure ID: F2]
Figure 2 

Autocycling is absent with the use of a pressure trigger as the actual RR = set RR of 16.

[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Case Series Data

Patient Mode of ventilation CVP BMI RRactual/set with flow trigger RRactual/set with pressure trigger TAH rate PEEP
Autocycling group

1 ACV 20 27.5 37/24 26/26 101 5

2 SIMV + PS 21 28.7 38/6 10/10 123 5

3 SIMV + PS 22 39.7 16/12 18/18 115 6

4 SIMV + PS 20 25.9 37/12 12/12 131 5

5 SIMV + PS 19 23.6 27/12 12/12 115 16

Nonautocycling group

6 SIMV + PS 18 31.2 10/10 110 8

7 SIMV + PS 7 32.3 18/18 30/30 110 25

8 SIMV + PS 15 32.3 10/10 125 5

9 SIMV + PS 19 25.8 18/12 18/12 120 5

10 SIMV + PS 10 30.8 14/10 12/10 110 5

ACV refers to assist control ventilation; SIMV, synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation; PS, pressure support; CVP, central venous pressure; BMI, body mass index; RR, respiratory rate; TAH, total artificial heart; PEEP, positive end expiratory pressure.

Article Categories:
  • Case report

Previous Document:  Comparison of the consumption of antidepressants in the immigrant and native populations in a Spanis...
Next Document:  Relation of tricuspid annular displacement and tissue Doppler imaging velocities with duration of we...