Document Detail


Measuring what matters in cerebral palsy: a breadth of important domains and outcome measures.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19969173     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Vargus-Adams JN, Martin LK. Measuring what matters in cerebral palsy: a breadth of important domains and outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: To establish domains of importance for evaluating therapeutic effects in childhood cerebral palsy (CP) and the best means of evaluating those domains. DESIGN: Delphi iterative survey. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric hospital with assessments conducted via mail or Internet. PARTICIPANTS: Youth with CP (n=21), parents of children with CP (n=23), and medical professionals (n=39). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of "the things you find most important to consider when you evaluate the effects of an intervention for yourself/your child/your patient with cerebral palsy" as domains of concern, followed by the best outcome measures to assess each of the domains, including preference rankings of those measures. RESULTS: Eight domains of importance were identified: impairment, general health, gross motor skills, self-care/fine motor skills, speech/communication, integration/participation, quality of life, and caregiver issues. All domains were viewed as important with no clear demarcation to allow reduction in number. Only quality of life emerged as being most important. Medical professionals suggested 10 to 27 different outcome measures for assessing each domain. Few of these measures, including the Gross Motor Function Measure and the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire, were broadly endorsed by the medical professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Parents, youth, and medical professionals identify a wide range of arenas that they would like to see impacted by interventions for CP. These arenas can be consolidated into 8 domains. Although many outcome measures are available to evaluate these domains, few of the measures are widely preferred. Further work may determine optimal assessment strategies and provide guidance for therapeutic decisions.
Authors:
Jilda N Vargus-Adams; Lauren K Martin
Related Documents :
15141133 - Where judgement fails: pitfalls in the selection process for medical personnel.
15506253 - Efficacy of critical incident monitoring for evaluating disaster medical readiness and ...
12698043 - Update on prostaglandin analogs.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation     Volume:  90     ISSN:  1532-821X     ISO Abbreviation:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil     Publication Date:  2009 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-12-08     Completed Date:  2010-01-26     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985158R     Medline TA:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2089-95     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Departments of Pediatrics and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. jilda.vargus-adams@cchmc.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Cerebral Palsy / physiopathology,  rehabilitation*
Child
Communication
Delphi Technique
Disability Evaluation
Health Personnel
Health Status
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Motor Skills
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)*
Parents
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Self Care
Speech
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
K23 HD049552/HD/NICHD NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acut...
Next Document:  Retraining visual processing skills to improve driving ability after stroke.