Document Detail


Measuring the appropriateness of prescribing in primary care: are current measures complete?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16336285     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Appropriateness of prescribing is often assessed by standard instruments. We wished to establish whether judgements of appropriateness that included patients' perspectives and contextual factors could lead to different conclusions when compared with commonly used instruments. To explore the predictive accuracy of these instruments. METHODS: The design was interviews of patients, audio recordings of the consultation and interviews of the doctors, in varied primary care practices in England. Participants were patients who were likely to discuss a medication issue. The outcome measures were judgements of appropriateness made by the researchers and by two instruments: the Prescribing Appropriateness Index and the Medication Appropriateness Index. Implications for the predictive accuracy of the measures was also investigated. RESULTS: From 35 cases there was agreement between the judges and the instruments in 22 cases, 16 were appropriate and 6 inappropriate. Of 10 cases classified as inappropriate by the instruments the judges thought four were appropriate. Of 18 cases classified as appropriate by the instruments, two were considered inappropriate by the judges. In seven cases the prescribing decisions could not be classified by the instruments because the decision was to not prescribe. CONCLUSIONS: Current measures of appropriateness of prescribing depend predominantly on pharmacological criteria, and so do not represent cases that would be judged appropriate when including the patient's views and contextual factors. If most prescribing is appropriate then use of these measures may lead to more false negatives than real negatives. The instruments should be renamed as measures of 'pharmacological appropriateness' and are useful where the incidence of this type of inappropriate prescribing is relatively high.
Authors:
N Barber; C Bradley; C Barry; F Stevenson; N Britten; L Jenkins
Related Documents :
16091895 - Starting or changing therapy - a prospective study exploring antiretroviral decision-ma...
25325215 - Large-scale assessment of missed opportunity risks in a complex hospital setting.
18277225 - Decision-making dysregulation in first-episode schizophrenia.
16010885 - Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making.
9452155 - Mortality and risk indicators for death during five years after acute myocardial infarc...
9827895 - Long-term administration of g-csf for aplastic anaemia is closely related to the early ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics     Volume:  30     ISSN:  0269-4727     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Pharm Ther     Publication Date:  2005 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-12-12     Completed Date:  2006-03-17     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8704308     Medline TA:  J Clin Pharm Ther     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  533-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, London, UK. nick@nickbarber.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Drug Prescriptions*
Drug Utilization*
England
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Physician's Practice Patterns*
Physician-Patient Relations
Primary Health Care

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Efficacy and tolerability of frovatriptan in acute migraine treatment: systematic review of randomiz...
Next Document:  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of benidipine using a slow receptor-binding model.