Document Detail


Measurement Accuracy of a Stand-Alone Oscillometric Central Blood Pressure Monitor: A Validation Report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23382326     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND The superiority of prognostic value of blood pressure (BP) measured at central aorta (CBP) over conventional brachial BP measured by cuff-based BP monitors has reignited the development of new noninvasive techniques for estimating CBP. The present study validated the accuracy of CBP measured by a newly developed stand-alone CBP monitor. METHODS The CBP monitor provided readings of brachial systolic BP (SBP), brachial diastolic BP (DBP), central SBP, and central pulse pressure (PP). Brachial PP and central DBP were calculated from the relevant readings. The accuracy of the brachial and central SBP, PP, and DBP was validated against the simultaneously recorded invasively measured central aortic SBP, PP, and DBP, according to the invasive standard requirements for the noninvasive brachial BP monitors from the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) in 85 subjects (255 measurements; age range, 30-93 years). RESULTS The mean differences of cuff BP with reference to the invasively measured central SBP, PP, and DBP were -2.6±9.0, -8.6±11.2, and 6.1±7.0mm Hg, respectively, with the former two being obviously underestimated at high CBP and overestimated at low CBP. In contrast, the corresponding differences for the central SBP, PP, and DBP measured by the CBP monitor were -0.6±5.5, -0.4±7.0, and -0.2±6.5mm Hg, respectively, without obvious systematic bias. The distribution of measurement errors for central SBP, PP, and DBP surpassed the AAMI criteria. CONCLUSION Central SBP, PP, and DBP can be measured accurately by a stand-alone automatic BP monitor.
Authors:
Hao-Min Cheng; Shih-Hsien Sung; Yuan-Ta Shih; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Wen-Chung Yu; Chen-Huan Chen
Related Documents :
10529626 - Antihypertensive therapy in renal patients - benefits and difficulties.
23732156 - Response and non-response to renal denervation: who is the ideal candidate?
22254896 - New insight into arrhythmia onset using hrv and bpv analysis.
14763026 - Effects of antihypertensive drugs on peritoneal vessels in hypertensive dogs with mild ...
17617306 - Predictive value of associations between carotid arterial sclerosis and left ventricula...
1806676 - Equivalent heart rate during ventricular fibrillation in the dog heart: mechanoenergeti...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of hypertension     Volume:  26     ISSN:  1941-7225     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Hypertens.     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-02-05     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8803676     Medline TA:  Am J Hypertens     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  42-50     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia;
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Comparison study of central blood pressure and wave reflection obtained from tonometry-based devices...
Next Document:  Inhibition of Neuregulin-1/ErbB Signaling in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Leads to Hypertension...