Document Detail

Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20413269     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
This clinical randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the effects of distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional orthognathic surgery (CO) on velopharyngeal function and speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients. Twenty-one CLP patients who required maxillary advancement ranging from 4 to 10 mm were recruited and randomly assigned to either CO or DO. Evaluation of resonance and nasal emission, nasoendoscopic velopharyngeal assessment and nasometry were performed preoperatively and at a minimum of two postoperative times: 3-8 months (mean 4 months) and 12-29 months (mean 17 months). Results showed no significant differences in speech and velopharyngeal function changes between the two groups. No correlation was found between the amount of advancement and the outcome measures. It was concluded that DO has no advantage over CO for the purpose of preventing velopharyngeal incompetence and speech disturbance in moderate cleft maxillary advancement.
H D P Chua; T L Whitehill; N Samman; L K Cheung
Related Documents :
9633169 - The influence of operator changes on orthodontic treatment times and results in a postg...
15658579 - Velopharyngeal insufficiency and its associated pathologies in cleft patients.
12970659 - Class ii subdivision treatment success rate with symmetric and asymmetric extraction pr...
19959609 - A randomized clinical trial to compare the goshgarian and nance palatal arch.
9294359 - Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla.
19816359 - Anterior vertical osteotomy for mandibular narrowing: assessing short-term outcome.
24684769 - Elective endovascular aortic repair conversion for type ia endoleak is not associated w...
23907169 - Preoperative evaluation of pediatric kidney stone prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy...
15546579 - Regional anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia for abdominal surgery in pa...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-04-22
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery     Volume:  39     ISSN:  1399-0020     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg     Publication Date:  2010 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-07-08     Completed Date:  2010-10-29     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8605826     Medline TA:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg     Country:  Denmark    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  633-40     Citation Subset:  D; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Discipline of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Bone Plates
Cleft Lip / surgery*
Cleft Palate / surgery*
Follow-Up Studies
Internal Fixators
Maxilla / surgery*
Nose / physiology
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures / instrumentation,  methods*
Osteogenesis, Distraction / instrumentation,  methods*
Osteotomy, Le Fort / methods
Speech / physiology*
Speech Disorders / classification
Speech Intelligibility / physiology
Treatment Outcome
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency / classification
Velopharyngeal Sphincter / physiology*
Voice / physiology
Voice Quality / physiology
Young Adult

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Effective incorporating spatial information in a mutual information based 3D-2D registration of a CT...
Next Document:  Relevance of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection to carcinogenesis of oral tongue cancer.