Document Detail


Managing multiple projects: a literature review of setting priorities and a pilot survey of healthcare researchers in an academic setting.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18066354     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To summarize and then assess with a pilot study the use of published best practice recommendations for priority setting during management of multiple healthcare research projects, in a resource-constrained environment. METHODS: Medical, economic, business, and operations literature was reviewed to summarize and develop a survey to assess best practices for managing multiple projects. Fifteen senior healthcare research project managers, directors, and faculty at an urban academic institution were surveyed to determine most commonly used priority rules, ranking of rules, characteristics of their projects, and availability of resources. Survey results were compared to literature recommendations to determine use of best practices. RESULTS: Seven priority-setting rules were identified for managing multiple projects. Recommendations on assigning priorities by project characteristics are presented. In the pilot study, a large majority of survey respondents follow best practice recommendations identified in the research literature. However, priority rules such as Most Total Successors (MTS) and Resource Scheduling Method (RSM) were used "very often" by half of the respondents when better performing priority rules were available. CONCLUSIONS: Through experience, project managers learn to manage multiple projects under resource constraints. Best practice literature can assist project managers in priority setting by recommending the most appropriate priority given resource constraints and project characteristics. There is room for improvement in managing multiple projects.
Authors:
Robert Borden Hopkins; Kaitryn Campbell; Daria O'Reilly; Jean-Eric Tarride; Jim Bowen; Gord Blackhouse; Ron Goerre
Related Documents :
17163114 - Implementing moe/mar: balancing project management with change management.
9208984 - A leadership-management training curriculum for pathology residents.
8936744 - Clinical incidents in general practice. prescription errors.
18024474 - Binom: a cytoscape plugin for manipulating and analyzing biological networks.
10703384 - Home care case management. perspectives from the home front.
21837344 - New and unusual scaffolds in medicinal chemistry.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review     Date:  2007-05-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association     Volume:  4     ISSN:  1559-4122     ISO Abbreviation:  Perspect Health Inf Manag     Publication Date:  2007  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-12-10     Completed Date:  2008-02-11     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101219871     Medline TA:  Perspect Health Inf Manag     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  4     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Program for the Assessment of Technology in Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Academies and Institutes / organization & administration*
Benchmarking / classification,  methods*
Health Priorities*
Health Services Research / organization & administration*
Humans
Pilot Projects
Program Evaluation
Research Personnel / organization & administration*,  psychology
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Coding for quality measurement: the relationship between hospital structural characteristics and cod...
Next Document:  Protective measures for private health information.