Document Detail

Management of atrial fibrillation.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24765527     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increases in the risk of mortality, congestive heart failure, and stroke. Medical treatment is aimed at preventing thrombo-embolic complications and reducing symptoms and consequences related to the arrhythmia. In the first section of this review, we discuss the principles of mainstream oral anticoagulant therapy and the possible advantages of the new oral anticoagulants. In the second section, we review the catheter ablation approaches to paroxysmal and persistent/long-standing AF, their results, and the current application of new catheters.
Authors:
Pasquale Vergara; Paolo Della Bella
Related Documents :
19909877 - Survival implication of left ventricular end-systolic diameter in mitral regurgitation ...
24872657 - High dose intravenous immunoglobulin may be complicated by myocardial infarction.
17719337 - Risk factors and predictors of torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia in patients w...
24570567 - Corpus callosum hemorrhage during left ventricular-assist device support.
3092847 - Influence of glyceryl trinitrate and nifedipine on coronary sinus blood flow and global...
25491007 - Long-term outcomes in patients with ambulatory new york heart association class iii and...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review     Date:  2014-04-01
Journal Detail:
Title:  F1000prime reports     Volume:  6     ISSN:  2051-7599     ISO Abbreviation:  F1000Prime Rep     Publication Date:  2014  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-04-25     Completed Date:  2014-06-24     Revised Date:  2014-06-24    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101599397     Medline TA:  F1000Prime Rep     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  22     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): F1000Prime Rep
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): F1000Prime Rep
ISSN: 2051-7599
Publisher: Faculty of 1000 Ltd
Article Information
Download PDF
© 2014 Faculty of 1000 Ltd
open-access:
Electronic publication date: Day: 01 Month: 4 Year: 2014
collection publication date: Year: 2014
Volume: 6E-location ID: 22
PubMed Id: 24765527
ID: 3974569
DOI: 10.12703/P6-22
Publisher Id: 22

Management of atrial fibrillation
Pasquale Vergara Email: pasqualevergara@yahoo.it
Paolo Della Bella
Arrhythmia Unit and Electrophysiology Laboratories, Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ospedale S. Raffaelevia Olgettina 60, MilanoItaly

Introduction

AF is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, with an estimated risk of development during lifetime of 1 in 4 men and women with at least 40 years of age [1-3]. The clinical interest in this condition derives from the fact that it increases the risk of mortality by two-fold, of congestive heart failure by three-fold, and of stroke by five-fold. The treatment of AF has two targets: the prevention of the thrombo-embolic complications and the reduction of symptoms and consequences related to the arrhythmia by rhythm or rate control therapies.


Prevention of thrombo-embolic events

Vitamin K antagonists reduced the relative risk of stroke by 64%, corresponding to an absolute annual risk reduction in all strokes of 2.7% [4]. It is universally recognized that the oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the mainstream therapy for the reduction of thrombo-embolic complications related to AF. Several scores have been developed to identify patients with high risk of thrombo-embolic events and those who need anticoagulation. However, given the high efficacy of OAC and the enormous consequences of strokes, it would be better to change our approach from the identification of many patients who need OAC to the research of the few patients who do not need OAC. Cardiologists should therefore consider the presence of AF itself as an indication to anticoagulation therapy, unless the patient has a truly low risk. The latest European Society of Cardiology Guidelines [5] suggest that, for the correct evaluation of patients with non-valvular AF, the use of the CHA2DS2-VASc—Congestive heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction, Hypertension, Age of at least 75 (doubled), Diabetes, Stroke (doubled)-Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74, and Sex category (female)—score [6] is more sensible compared with the previously used CHADS2 score. Patients with AF who have at least one stroke risk factor are recommended to receive OAC with either well-controlled vitamin K antagonist therapy—international normalized ratio (INR) 2-3, with more than 70% of time in the therapeutic range—or one of the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) [5]. Only patients with lone AF who are less than 65 years old have very low absolute stroke rates and do not require OAC.

The OAC usually revives in the physician's mind the ghost of major bleeding; this fear is the main reason for the frequent denial of such an effective therapy to a high number of patients. The Guidelines suggest the assessment of the bleeding risk in all patients with AF with the HAS-BLED [5]—Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (e.g. age more than 65 years and frailty), Drugs/alcohol concomitantly—score [7]. The score should be used to balance the risk of stroke against potential major bleeding events; however, a high-risk score should not exclude patients from OAC, but favor the identification and correction of potentially reversible risk factors, such as uncontrolled blood pressure, concomitant use of aspirin/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and labile INRs.

In patients who are not candidates for OAC, aspirin has been widely considered a good surrogate therapy with fewer side effects. The weapon used in this battle, however, appears not to be pathophysiologically adequate to the setting; in fact, thrombi in patients with AF are predominantly fibrin-rich (the so-called “red clots”), while thrombi found in coronary artery lesions tend to be platelet-rich (“white clots”) [8]. Therefore, such an effective therapy in athero-thrombotic vascular disease becomes of limited value in patients with AF. The meta-analysis by Hart et al. [4] reviewed seven randomized control trials evaluating the antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF (3990 participants in aspirin-only trials). The result was a reduction of risk of stroke with anti-platelet therapy compared with placebo by 19% (95% confidence interval [CI] –1% to 35%) with a 95% CI that included zero; this raises the possibility of non-significant clinical effect. Aspirin has been frequently used in elderly patients, with the hope of fewer side effects. This belief was not confirmed by the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged (BAFTA) trial [9], which randomly allocated patients over 75 years of age to receive OAC with warfarin or 75 mg of aspirin daily; in the OAC group, the yearly risk of the primary endpoint (disabling stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or arterial embolism) was 1.8% and significantly lower than the 3.8% obtained with aspirin; warfarin treatment in the elderly was associated with a 52% relative risk reduction compared with aspirin. Even when a second anti-platelet agent, such as clopidogrel in the ACTIVE-W (Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events) trial [10], is added, the effect is clearly inferior to the one obtained by the OAC treatment. Following the hypothesis that double anti-platelet association was an effective replacement of OAC, the ACTIVE-A trial [11] randomized 7554 patients with AF to aspirin plus clopidogrel or to warfarin. Double anti-platelet therapy reduced the risk of stroke by 28%, but it increased the risk of major bleeding by 50%. With the advent of NOACs, which promise the efficacy of standard OAC without any increased risk of bleeding, it is not difficult to foresee that both aspirin and the double anti-platelet therapy for AF will become obsolete or restricted to rare cases.

NOACs, in contrast to warfarin (which blocks multiple active vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors), block the activity of one single step in the coagulation process. Dabigatran acts as an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, while rivaroxaban and apixaban both inhibit factor Xa. All NOACs have shown non-inferiority in stroke and systemic embolism prevention, compared with warfarin. In the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial [12], dabigatran 150 mg bis in die (twice a day – b.i.d.) was superior to warfarin, with no significant difference in the safety endpoint of major bleeding; the reduced dosage of 110 mg b.i.d. was non-inferior to warfarin, with 20% fewer major bleeds; both dosages were associated with a non-significant increase of 28% in myocardial infarction. In the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thrombotic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial [13], apixaban 5 mg b.i.d. reduced the primary endpoint of stroke or systemic embolism by 21% compared with warfarin, with a 31% reduction in major bleeding and a significant 11% reduction in all-cause mortality. Edoxaban, a new factor Xa inhibitor, has completed late-stage clinical assessment [14]. A meta-analysis pooling more than 40,000 patients from four randomized controlled trials comparing NOACs with warfarin has been recently published [15]; compared with warfarin, the NOACs, as a class, reduced all-cause mortality by about 10% in the populations enrolled in the clinical trials. Stroke and systemic embolic events were significantly reduced in patients receiving NOACs; the benefit was driven mainly by substantial protection against hemorrhagic stroke, while they had similar efficacy in the prevention of ischemic stroke. NOACs, however, were associated with an increase in gastro-intestinal bleeding.


Rhythm and rate control strategies

Several trials in recent years tried to assess whether restoration of sinus rhythm offers any advantage compared with the strategy of rate control. Although sinus rhythm restoration is theoretically supposed to be the best option, many studies such as PIAF (Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation) [16], AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management) [17], RACE (RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation) [18], and STAF (Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) [19] failed to report any survival benefit from rhythm-control strategy. Also, in the population of patients with heart failure, no clear benefit was demonstrated for this strategy [20,21]. Later “on treatment” analysis of the AFFIRM trial showed that the presence of sinus rhythm is associated with a lower risk of death [22]; this analysis suggested that the adverse effects of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) overcome the beneficial effects of sinus rhythm restoration; it is also conceivable that the efficacy of currently available AADs is so limited and transient that any positive effect of sinus rhythm does not have enough time to develop. This raised the interest in other treatments, such as catheter ablation (CA) of AF, whose effects are supposed to be more durable. Wilber et al. [23] compared the efficacy of catheter ablation with AAD treatment in treating symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF who had not responded to at least 1 AAD; the invasive treatment resulted in a longer time to treatment failure (66% of patients in the catheter ablation group remained free from protocol-defined treatment failure compared with 16% of patients treated with AAD therapy) during the 9-month follow-up period [23].

The efficacy of CA is dependent on the type of AF, the presence of cardiac structural heart disease, and co-morbidities. Presence of left atrial scar is an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence after the ablation [24]. Magnetic resonance imaging studies demonstrated that recurrence rate after CA is directly related to the amount of left atrial scar [25]: patients with minimal late gadolinium enhancement (8.0% ± 4.2%) have fewer recurrences (14.0%) compared with patients with moderate enhancement (21.3% ± 5.8%, recurrence rate = 43.3%) and patients with extensive enhancement (50.1% ± 15.4%, recurrence rate = 75%). When confirmed by large population studies, the extension of left atrial scar can be included in the pre-operative assessment of AF patients in order to reduce the number of procedures in patients with expected low efficacy.

The best results of the CA procedure are actually obtained in patients with paroxysmal AF in the absence of cardiac structural disease and co-morbidities [26-33]. In those patients, AF is related to the presence of triggers in the pulmonary veins (PVs) [34,35]; therefore, PV isolation is the cornerstone treatment for patients with paroxysmal AF [34,36-38]. In a recent meta-analysis of 19 studies, rates of single-procedure success for paroxysmal AF ablation were 68.6% (95% CI 58.9% to 77.0%) at 1 year, 61.1% (95% CI 49.8% to 71.2%) at 3 years, and 62.3% (95% CI 39.8%to 80.5%) at 5 years [39]. The pooled 12-month success rate for paroxysmal AF ablation after a single procedure was 66.6% (95% CI 58.2% to 74.2%); it increased to 79.0% (95% CI 67.6% to 87.1%) when multiple procedures were used (average number of procedures: 1.45). The most common cause of arrhythmia recurrence is reconduction across PV isolation; Nanthakumar et al. [40] found reconduction in 42 of 51 previously isolated veins in 15 patients with recurrent symptoms after a first ablation for paroxysmal AF. In the experience of Verma et al. [41], all veins were still isolated in 81% of patients undergoing a repeat procedure after the index ablation; this rate dropped to 5% and 0% in the patients maintaining sinus rhythm on AADs and in patients with arrhythmia despite AADs.

Ablation has been performed for many years with the point-by-point approach with continuous catheter dragging during radiofrequency delivery or by repeated short-time radiofrequency shots. This approach is highly dependent on the operator's skill and the contact between the tip of the catheter and the target tissue; freedom from arrhythmia recurrences is best achieved when ablation lesions are placed with an average contact force (CF) of more than 20 g, and clinical failure is frequent with an average CF of less than 10 g [42,43].

Recently developed catheters allow PV isolation with one or a few shots of radiofrequency, cryo-energy, or laser pulses. Medtronic PVAC (Medtronic Ablation Frontiers, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and nMARQ™ (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) catheters have a circular shape that fits with pulmonary veins ostia; radiofrequency can be delivered simultaneously by a variable number of electrodes [44,45]. The Arctic Front Advance™ Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter (Arctic Front; Medtronic) consists of a balloon that can be placed at each PV ostium in order to obtain PV occlusion; ablation is then performed by cryo-energy [46,47]. HeartLight™ (CardioFocus Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) is a visually guided laser ablation catheter with a variable-diameter balloon that accommodates a 2-Fr endoscope; it provides real-time visualization of the balloon contact and blood during the ablation. In a multicenter experience enrolling 200 patients with paroxysmal AF, it showed an efficacy similar to that of radiofrequency ablation [48]. Reported major complications were cardiac tamponade (2%) and phrenic nerve palsy (2.5%). These four new catheters have the potential advantage of faster and technically easier procedures [49].

PV isolation is still mandatory for the treatment of persistent and long-standing AF. However, recurrent and chronic AF induces progressive electrical and tissue structural remodeling, thus making AF a self-perpetuating disease [50]; to interrupt this looping process, the ablation procedure in non-paroxysmal AF patients usually requires some kind of substrate modification. Three approaches were developed: linear lesions, complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation, and electrical rotor elimination. Linear lesions have been applied on the left atria roof and on the mitral isthmus with the aim of preventing macro-re-entry-dependent arrhythmias; several studies reported that additional lines improve the efficacy of the procedure [51,52]. The downside of this approach becomes evident when the lines are not electrically continuous; in those cases, atrial tachycardia frequently develops [53]. In order to reduce macro-re-entry arrhythmias recurrences, the operator should validate the presence of a bidirectional conduction block across all ablation lines [54]. CFAE ablation was proposed by Nademanee et al. [55]; it can be used alone or in combination with PV isolation. Manifest controversies still exist concerning the usefulness of this approach because it frequently requires wide left atrial ablation, and it is hampered by a high post-procedural atrial tachycardia rate. In the RASTA (randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation) study [56], 1-year AF-free survival was significantly lower in patients treated with the standard approach (PV isolation + ablation of documented non-PV triggers identified by a standard stimulation protocol) plus CFAE ablation compared with the standard approach alone or the standard approach combined with the empirical ablation at common non-PV trigger sites. Recent evidence demonstrated that electrical rotors have a key role in sustaining AF in humans. Narayan et al. [57] used a 64-pole basket catheter to record monophasic action potentials in human left atria. A computational approach was used to analyze the repolarization and conduction dynamics with the aim of reconstructing spatio-temporal AF maps; ablation guided by identification of focal impulses and rotors improved the overall procedure success [58,59]. Results of catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal AF are still not satisfactory. In the meta-analysis by Ganesan et al. [39], rates of single-procedure success for non-paroxysmal AF ablation were 50.8% (95% CI 34.3% to 67.2%) at 1 year and 41.6% (95% CI 24.7% to 60.8%) at 3 years. The pooled 12-month success rate after a single procedure was 51.9% (95% CI 33.8% to 69.5%); it increased to 77.8% (95% CI 68.7% to 84.9%) when multiple procedures were used (average number of procedures: 1.67).


Notes
Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References
1. Benjamin EJ,Levy D,Vaziri SM,D'Agostino RB,Belanger AJ,Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart StudyJAMAYear: 19942718404410.1001/jama.1994.035103500500368114238
2. Kannel WB,Abbott RD,Savage DD,McNamara PM. Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham studyN Engl J MedYear: 198230610182210.1056/NEJM1982042930617037062992
3. Lloyd-Jones DM,Wang TJ,Leip EP,Larson MG,Levy D,Vasan RS,D'Agostino RB,Massaro JM,Beiser A,Wolf PA,Benjamin EJ. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart StudyCirculationYear: 200411010424610.1161/01.CIR.0000140263.20897.4215313941
4. Hart RG,Pearce LA,Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillationAnn Intern MedYear: 20071468576710.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-0000717577005

http://f1000.com/prime/718304413

5. Camm AJ,Lip GY,De Caterina R,Savelieva I,Atar D,Hohnloser SH,Hindricks G,Kirchhof P. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm AssociationEur Heart JYear: 20123327194710.1093/eurheartj/ehs25322922413

http://f1000.com/prime/718304414

6. Lip GY,Nieuwlaat R,Pisters R,Lane DA,Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillationChestYear: 20101372637210.1378/chest.09-158419762550
7. Pisters R,Lane DA,Nieuwlaat R,de Vos CB,Crijns HJ,Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart SurveyChestYear: 2010138109310010.1378/chest.10-013420299623

http://f1000.com/prime/718304415

8. Watson T,Shantsila E,Lip GY. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow's triad revisitedLancetYear: 20093731556610.1016/S0140-6736(09)60040-419135613
9. Mant J,Hobbs FD,Fletcher K,Roalfe A,Fitzmaurice D,Lip GY,Murray E,investigators B,Midland Research Practices N. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trialLancetYear: 200737049350310.1016/S0140-6736(07)61233-117693178

http://f1000.com/prime/1090997

10. Investigators AWGotA Connolly S,Pogue J,Hart R,Pfeffer M,Hohnloser S,Chrolavicius S,Yusuf S. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trialLancetYear: 200636719031210.1016/S0140-6736(06)68845-416765759

http://f1000.com/prime/14347

11. Investigators A,Connolly SJ,Pogue J,Hart RG,Hohnloser SH,Pfeffer M,Chrolavicius S,Yusuf S. Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillationN Engl J MedYear: 200936020667810.1056/NEJMoa090130119336502

http://f1000.com/prime/1159068

12. Connolly SJ,Ezekowitz MD,Yusuf S,Eikelboom J,Oldgren J,Parekh A,Pogue J,Reilly PA,Themeles E,Varrone J,Wang S,Alings M,Xavier D,Zhu J,Diaz R,Lewis BS,Darius H,Diener H,Joyner CD,Wallentin L. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillationN Engl J MedYear: 200936111395110.1056/NEJMoa090556119717844

http://f1000.com/prime/1474959

13. Granger CB,Alexander JH,McMurray JJV,Lopes RD,Hylek EM,Hanna M,Al-Khalidi HR,Ansell J,Atar D,Avezum A,Bahit MC,Diaz R,Easton JD,Ezekowitz JA,Flaker G,Garcia D,Geraldes M,Gersh BJ,Golitsyn S,Goto S,Hermosillo AG,Hohnloser SH,Horowitz J,Mohan P,Jansky P,Lewis BS,Lopez-Sendon JL,Pais P,Parkhomenko A,Verheugt FWA,et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillationN Engl J MedYear: 20113659819210.1056/NEJMoa110703921870978

http://f1000.com/prime/13199976

14. Giugliano RP,Ruff CT,Braunwald E,Murphy SA,Wiviott SD,Halperin JL,Waldo AL,Ezekowitz MD,Weitz JI,Špinar J,Ruzyllo W,Ruda M,Koretsune Y,Betcher J,Shi M,Grip LT,Patel SP,Patel I,Hanyok JJ,Mercuri M,Antman EM. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillationN Engl J MedYear: 2013369209310410.1056/NEJMoa131090724251359
15. Ruff CT,Giugliano RP,Braunwald E,Hoffman EB,Deenadayalu N,Ezekowitz MD,Camm AJ,Weitz JI,Lewis BS,Parkhomenko A,Yamashita T,Antman EM. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trialsLancetYear: 2013159556210.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-024315724

http://f1000.com/prime/718201417

16. Hohnloser SH,Kuck KH,Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation--Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trialLancetYear: 200035617899410.1016/S0140-6736(00)03230-X11117910
17. Wyse DG,Waldo AL,DiMarco JP,Domanski MJ,Rosenberg Y,Schron EB,Kellen JC,Greene HL,Mickel MC,Dalquist JE,Corley SD. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillationN Engl J MedYear: 200234718253310.1056/NEJMoa02132812466506
18. Van Gelder IC,Hagens VE,Bosker HA,Kingma JH,Kamp O,Kingma T,Said SA,Darmanata JI,Timmermans AJ,Tijssen JG,Crijns HJ. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillationN Engl J MedYear: 200234718344010.1056/NEJMoa02137512466507
19. Carlsson J,Miketic S,Windeler J,Cuneo A,Haun S,Micus S,Walter S,Tebbe U. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) studyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 20034116909610.1016/S0735-1097(03)00332-212767648
20. Caldeira D,David C,Sampaio C. Rate vs rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsEur J Intern MedYear: 2011224485510.1016/j.ejim.2011.05.00121925051
21. Roy D,Talajic M,Nattel S,Wyse DG,Dorian P,Lee KL,Bourassa MG,Arnold JMO,Buxton AE,Camm AJ,Connolly SJ,Dubuc M,Ducharme A,Guerra PG,Hohnloser SH,Lambert J,Le Heuzey J,O'Hara G,Pedersen OD,Rouleau J,Singh BN,Stevenson LW,Stevenson WG,Thibault B,Waldo AL. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failureN Engl J MedYear: 200835826677710.1056/NEJMoa070878918565859

http://f1000.com/prime/1115293

22. Corley SD,Epstein AE,DiMarco JP,Domanski MJ,Geller N,Greene HL,Josephson RA,Kellen JC,Klein RC,Krahn AD,Mickel M,Mitchell LB,Nelson JD,Rosenberg Y,Schron E,Shemanski L,Waldo AL,Wyse DG. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) StudyCirculationYear: 200410915091310.1161/01.CIR.0000121736.16643.1115007003

http://f1000.com/prime/718304428

23. Wilber DJ,Pappone C,Neuzil P,de Paola A,Marchlinski F,Natale A,Macle L,Daoud EG,Calkins H,Hall B,Reddy V,Augello G,Reynolds MR,Vinekar C,Liu CY,Berry SM,Berry DA. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trialJAMAYear: 20103033334010.1001/jama.2009.202920103757

http://f1000.com/prime/1768960

24. Chang S,Tai C,Lin Y,Wongcharoen W,Lo L,Tuan T,Udyavar AR,Chang S,Tsao H,Hsieh M,Hu Y,Chen Y,Chen S. Biatrial substrate properties in patients with atrial fibrillationJ Cardiovasc ElectrophysiolYear: 2007181134910.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00941.x17764448
25. Oakes RS,Badger TJ,Kholmovski EG,Akoum N,Burgon NS,Fish EN,Blauer JJE,Rao SN,DiBella EVR,Segerson NM,Daccarett M,Windfelder J,McGann CJ,Parker D,MacLeod RS,Marrouche NF. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillationCirculationYear: 200911917586710.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.81187719307477

http://f1000.com/prime/718304430

26. Pappone C,Rosanio S,Augello G,Gallus G,Vicedomini G,Mazzone P,Gulletta S,Gugliotta F,Pappone A,Santinelli V,Tortoriello V,Sala S,Zangrillo A,Crescenzi G,Benussi S,Alfieri O. Mortality, morbidity, and quality of life after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: outcomes from a controlled nonrandomized long-term studyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 2003421859710.1016/S0735-1097(03)00577-112875749
27. Gaita F,Caponi D,Scaglione M,Montefusco A,Corleto A,Di Monte F,Coin D,Di Donna P,Giustetto C. Long-term clinical results of 2 different ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillationCirc Arrhythm ElectrophysiolYear: 200812697510.1161/CIRCEP.108.77488519808418
28. Sawhney N,Anousheh R,Chen WC,Narayan S,Feld GK. Five-year outcomes after segmental pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillationAm J CardiolYear: 20091043667210.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.04419616669
29. Bhargava M,Di Biase L,Mohanty P,Prasad S,Martin DO,Williams-Andrews M,Wazni OM,Burkhardt JD,Cummings JE,Khaykin Y,Verma A,Hao S,Beheiry S,Hongo R,Rossillo A,Raviele A,Bonso A,Themistoclakis S,Stewart K,Saliba WI,Schweikert RA,Natale A. Impact of type of atrial fibrillation and repeat catheter ablation on long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter studyHeart RhythmYear: 2009614031210.1016/j.hrthm.2009.06.01419716348
30. Tzou WS,Marchlinski FE,Zado ES,Lin D,Dixit S,Callans DJ,Cooper JM,Bala R,Garcia F,Hutchinson MD,Riley MP,Verdino R,Gerstenfeld EP. Long-term outcome after successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillationCirc Arrhythm ElectrophysiolYear: 201032374210.1161/CIRCEP.109.92377120335557
31. Ouyang F,Tilz R,Chun J,Schmidt B,Wissner E,Zerm T,Neven K,Köktürk B,Konstantinidou M,Metzner A,Fuernkranz A,Kuck K. Long-term results of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: lessons from a 5-year follow-upCirculationYear: 201012223687710.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.94680621098450
32. Medi C,Sparks PB,Morton JB,Kistler PM,Halloran K,Rosso R,Vohra JK,Kumar S,Kalman JM. Pulmonary vein antral isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from long-term follow-upJ Cardiovasc ElectrophysiolYear: 2011221374110.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01885.x20812937
33. Weerasooriya R,Khairy P,Litalien J,Macle L,Hocini M,Sacher F,Lellouche N,Knecht S,Wright M,Nault I,Miyazaki S,Scavee C,Clementy J,Haissaguerre M,Jais P. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: are results maintained at 5 years of follow-up?J Am Coll CardiolYear: 201157160610.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.06121211687

http://f1000.com/prime/8609957

34. Haissaguerre M,Jais P,Shah DC,Takahashi A,Hocini M,Quiniou G,Garrigue S,Le Mouroux A,Le Metayer P,Clementy J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veinsN Engl J MedYear: 19983396596610.1056/NEJM1998090333910039725923
35. Chen SA,Hsieh MH,Tai CT,Tsai CF,Prakash VS,Yu WC,Hsu TL,Ding YA,Chang MS. Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins: electrophysiological characteristics, pharmacological responses, and effects of radiofrequency ablationCirculationYear: 199910018798610.1161/01.CIR.100.18.187910545432
36. Pappone C,Oreto G,Rosanio S,Vicedomini G,Tocchi M,Gugliotta F,Salvati A,Dicandia C,Calabrò MP,Mazzone P,Ficarra E,Di Gioia C,Gulletta S,Nardi S,Santinelli V,Benussi S,Alfieri O. Atrial electroanatomic remodeling after circumferential radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation: efficacy of an anatomic approach in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillationCirculationYear: 200110425394410.1161/hc4601.09851711714647
37. Oral H,Knight BP,Tada H,Ozaydin M,Chugh A,Hassan S,Scharf C,Lai SWK,Greenstein R,Pelosi F,Strickberger SA,Morady F. Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillationCirculationYear: 200210510778110.1161/hc0902.10471211877358
38. Ouyang F,Bansch D,Ernst S,Schaumann A,Hachiya H,Chen M,Chun J,Falk P,Khanedani A,Antz M,Kuck KH. Complete isolation of left atrium surrounding the pulmonary veins: new insights from the double-Lasso technique in paroxysmal atrial fibrillationCirculationYear: 200411020909610.1161/01.CIR.0000144459.37455.EE15466640
39. Ganesan AN,Shipp NJ,Brooks AG,Kuklik P,Lau DH,Lim HS,Sullivan T,Roberts-Thomson KC,Sanders P. Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysisJ Am Heart AssocYear: 20132e00454910.1161/JAHA.112.00454923537812

http://f1000.com/prime/718304431

40. Nanthakumar K,Plumb VJ,Epstein AE,Veenhuyzen GD,Link D,Kay GN. Resumption of electrical conduction in previously isolated pulmonary veins: rationale for a different strategy?CirculationYear: 200410912262910.1161/01.CIR.0000121423.78120.4914993124

http://f1000.com/prime/718304432

41. Verma A,Kilicaslan F,Pisano E,Marrouche NF,Fanelli R,Brachmann J,Geunther J,Potenza D,Martin DO,Cummings J,Burkhardt JD,Saliba W,Schweikert RA,Natale A. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conductionCirculationYear: 20051126273510.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.53319016061753

http://f1000.com/prime/718304434

42. Kuck K,Reddy VY,Schmidt B,Natale A,Neuzil P,Saoudi N,Kautzner J,Herrera C,Hindricks G,Jaïs P,Nakagawa H,Lambert H,Shah DC. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata studyHeart RhythmYear: 20129182310.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.02121872560

http://f1000.com/prime/718304435

43. Reddy VY,Shah D,Kautzner J,Schmidt B,Saoudi N,Herrera C,Jaïs P,Hindricks G,Peichl P,Yulzari A,Lambert H,Neuzil P,Natale A,Kuck K. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA studyHeart RhythmYear: 2012917899510.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.01622820056

http://f1000.com/prime/718009203

44. Boersma LV,Wijffels MC,Oral H,Wever EF,Morady F. Pulmonary vein isolation by duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency energy with a multielectrode ablation catheterHeart RhythmYear: 2008516354210.1016/j.hrthm.2008.08.03719084796

http://f1000.com/prime/1141978

45. Wieczorek M,Hoeltgen R,Akin E,Salili AR,Oral H,Morady F. Results of short-term and long-term pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency energyJ Cardiovasc ElectrophysiolYear: 20102139940510.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01640.x19909386
46. Van Belle Y,Janse P,Rivero-Ayerza MJ,Thornton AS,Jessurun ER,Theuns D,Jordaens L. Pulmonary vein isolation using an occluding cryoballoon for circumferential ablation: feasibility, complications, and short-term outcomeEur Heart JYear: 20072822313710.1093/eurheartj/ehm22717569680
47. Packer DL,Kowal RC,Wheelan KR,Irwin JM,Champagne J,Guerra PG,Dubuc M,Reddy V,Nelson L,Holcomb RG,Lehmann JW,Ruskin JN. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trialJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 20136117132310.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.06423500312
48. Dukkipati SR,Kuck K,Neuzil P,Woollett I,Kautzner J,McElderry HT,Schmidt B,Gerstenfeld EP,Doshi SK,Horton R,Metzner A,d'Avila A,Ruskin JN,Natale A,Reddy VY. Pulmonary vein isolation using a visually guided laser balloon catheter: the first 200-patient multicenter clinical experienceCirc Arrhythm ElectrophysiolYear: 201364677210.1161/CIRCEP.113.00043123559674

http://f1000.com/prime/717997428

49. Bordignon S,Chun KR,Gunawardene M,Fuernkranz A,Urban V,Schulte-Hahn B,Nowak B,Schmidt B. Comparison of balloon catheter ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation: the laser versus cryo studyJ Cardiovasc ElectrophysiolYear: 2013249879410.1111/jce.1219223800359
50. Wijffels MC,Kirchhof CJ,Dorland R,Allessie MA. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goatsCirculationYear: 19959219546810.1161/01.CIR.92.7.19547671380
51. Hocini M,Jais P,Sanders P,Takahashi Y,Rotter M,Rostock T,Hsu LF,Sacher F,Reuter S,Clementy J,Haissaguerre M. Techniques, evaluation, and consequences of linear block at the left atrial roof in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized studyCirculationYear: 200511236889610.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.54105216344401
52. Jaïs P,Hocini M,Hsu L,Sanders P,Scavee C,Weerasooriya R,Macle L,Raybaud F,Garrigue S,Shah DC,Le Metayer P,Clémenty J,Haïssaguerre M. Technique and results of linear ablation at the mitral isthmusCirculationYear: 20041102996300210.1161/01.CIR.0000146917.75041.5815520313
53. Chae S,Oral H,Good E,Dey S,Wimmer A,Crawford T,Wells D,Sarrazin J,Chalfoun N,Kuhne M,Fortino J,Huether E,Lemerand T,Pelosi F,Bogun F,Morady F,Chugh A. Atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation: mechanistic insights, results of catheter ablation, and risk factors for recurrenceJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 2007501781710.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.04417964043
54. Jais P,Hocini M,O'Neill MD,Klein GJ,Knecht S,Sheiiro M,Arentes L,Kodali S,Clementy J,Haissaguerre M. How to perform linear lesionsHeart RhythmYear: 20074803910.1016/j.hrthm.2007.01.02117556210

http://f1000.com/prime/718304437

55. Nademanee K,McKenzie J,Kosar E,Schwab M,Sunsaneewitayakul B,Vasavakul T,Khunnawat C,Ngarmukos T. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrateJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 20044320445310.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.05415172410
56. Dixit S,Marchlinski FE,Lin D,Callans DJ,Bala R,Riley MP,Garcia FC,Hutchinson MD,Ratcliffe SJ,Cooper JM,Verdino RJ,Patel VV,Zado ES,Cash NR,Killian T,Tomson TT,Gerstenfeld EP. Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: RASTA studyCirc Arrhythm ElectrophysiolYear: 201252879410.1161/CIRCEP.111.96622622139886

http://f1000.com/prime/718304436

57. Narayan SM,Krummen DE,Rappel WJ. Clinical mapping approach to diagnose electrical rotors and focal impulse sources for human atrial fibrillationJ Cardiovasc ElectrophysiolYear: 2012234475410.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02332.x22537106

http://f1000.com/prime/718304433

58. Narayan SM,Krummen DE,Clopton P,Shivkumar K,Miller JM. Direct or coincidental elimination of stable rotors or focal sources may explain successful atrial fibrillation ablation: on-treatment analysis of the CONFIRM trial (Conventional ablation for AF with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation)J Am Coll CardiolYear: 2013621384710.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.02123563126

http://f1000.com/prime/717998068

59. Narayan SM,Krummen DE,Shivkumar K,Clopton P,Rappel WJ,Miller JM. Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trialJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 2012606283610.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.02222818076

http://f1000.com/prime/718304429


Abbreviations
AAD anti-arrhythmic drug
ACTIVE-W Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events
AF atrial fibrillation
AFFIRM Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management
b.i.d. bis in die (twice a day)
CA catheter ablation
CF contact force
CFAE complex fractionated atrial electrogram
CI confidence interval
INR international normalized ratio
NOAC new oral anticoagulant
OAC oral anticoagulation
PV pulmonary vein

Article Categories:
  • Review Article


Previous Document:  Treatment advances in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Next Document:  Fanconi anemia and the cell cycle: new perspectives on aneuploidy.