Document Detail


Malignancies Within Rhinophyma: Report of Three New Cases and Review of the Literature.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21858597     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Rhinophyma, which represents the end stage of rosacea, is characterized by sebaceous hyperplasia, fibrosis follicular plugging, and telangiectasia. Although it is commonly labeled as an aesthetic problem, it may also determine airway obstruction and because of its nature to hide the growth of tumors. Due to the increasing number of reports of nonmelanoma skin types of cancer within rhinophyma, further concern about a higher incidence of malignancies in rhinophyma than in the skin of normal noses is reasonable. METHODS: We describe three male patients who developed malignancies (2 basal and 1 squamous cell carcinoma) associated with rhinophyma disease. The tumors developed over a mean of 23.3 years after primary diagnosis of rhinophyma. One case had a previous history of facial skin tumor. Surgical excision with clear margins allowed resolution in all three patients with a mean follow-up of 34.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: These three new cases and the review of 43 cases reported in the literature call attention to the clinical features of carcinomas arising in the context of rhinophyma, raising further concerns about the possible association between these two entities. The need for histologic examination of all surgically removed tissue in patients with rhinophyma is highlighted. Several macroscopic changes, including ulceration, drainage, and a rapid growth pattern, should alarm the physician and should be considered as suspicious of a malignant degeneration. Unexpected clinical modifications of a preexisting long-lasting silent rhinophyma could indicate the possibility of hidden malignancy rather than a rhinophyma itself. Although evidence of an association between the two entities remains inconclusive, half of the malignancies reported in our review were incidental findings associated with rhinophyma. Thus, since rhinophyma should not be considered solely a cosmetic problem, we recommend that all specimens be reviewed by a pathologist and if malignancy is diagnosed, re-excision with clear margins should be achieved when necessary with periodic follow-up.
Authors:
Davide Lazzeri; Livio Colizzi; Giovanni Licata; Daniele Pagnini; Agnese Proietti; Greta Alì; Pietro Massei; Gabriella Fontanini; Marcello Pantaloni; Tommaso Agostini
Related Documents :
21986647 - An amstar assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral health...
15808257 - Central corneal mosaic opacities in schnyder's crystalline dystrophy.
21751687 - Early postoperative takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a case report.
18476807 - A case of sterile endophthalmitis after repeated intravitreal bevacizumab injection.
15673977 - Gorham disease of the spine: a case report and treatment strategies for this enigmatic ...
15282967 - Analysis on the detection of new leprosy cases before, during and after the year of lep...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-8-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  Aesthetic plastic surgery     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1432-5241     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-8-22     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7701756     Medline TA:  Aesthetic Plast Surg     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Operative Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2 Cisanello, 56100, Pisa, Italy, davidelazzeri@gmail.com.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  DIEP Flap Donor Site Versus Elective Abdominoplasty Short-term Complication Rates: A Meta-analysis.
Next Document:  The Blue-Eyes Stereotype: Do Eye Color, Pupil Diameter, and Scleral Color Affect Attractiveness?