| Making the most of peer review. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20689520 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
The 'climategate' controversy exposed aspects of the peer review process that are normally kept secret, and has prompted a discussion on ways to improve peer review. |
| | |
Authors:
|
- |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Editorial |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Nature nanotechnology Volume: 5 ISSN: 1748-3395 ISO Abbreviation: Nat Nanotechnol Publication Date: 2010 Aug |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-08-06 Completed Date: 2011-01-07 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 101283273 Medline TA: Nat Nanotechnol Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 553 Citation Subset: IM |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Decision Support Techniques* Peer Review / ethics*, trends* Prejudice* |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: The counter-regulatory effects of ESE-1 during angiotensin II-mediated vascular inflammation and rem...
Next Document: A cure for cancer research.